Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factors

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dionísio, Joana Magalhães
Publication Date: 2019
Format: Master thesis
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/93002
Summary: The use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation, is a common practice in several countries as it has several benefits, such as decreasing pressure on freshwater sources and reduced nutrient loads to receiving waters. However, wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are not always able to remove all the contaminants present, thus representing a significant risk for environmental contamination. Soil contamination by wastewater may potentially promote contaminants uptake and accumulation by plants and derived products which consequently can affect human health. Pathogens and heavy metals are traditionally the main concern, however contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), and particularly pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs), are gaining scientific and public attention. In the present dissertation, the electrokinetic (EK) process was applied as a remediation technology to an agricultural soil contaminated with a mixture of PPCPs. To better understand the remediation mechanisms involved, different assays were developed to discriminate biotic, abiotic and EK contributions, alone and coupled, to the degradation of the PPCPs. As environmental factors may affect the remediation processes, trials with and without irrigation and at different temperatures were also conducted (18 and 24 ºC). As contaminants, 10 commonly environmentally occurring PPCPs were selected for the study: 17β-estradiol (E2), sulfamethoxazole (SMX), bisphenol A (BPA), ibuprofen (IBU), 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), oxybenzone (OXY), triclosan (TCS), diclofenac (DCF), caffeine (CAF) and carbamazepine (CBZ). These compounds represent the major PPCPs classes and attain diverse physicochemical properties. All experiments were carried out in a lab scale microcosm using a 12h ON/OFF current mode at 20 mA for 4 days (in duplicates). The best remediation results were attained when EK process was applied in biotic conditions at 24ºC and combined with a daily irrigation (EK-Biotic-24-W); these conditions allowed to remove approximately 37% of the total mass on PPCPs in the soil. By eliminating the microbiological contribution to the degradation processes (sterilized soil; abiotic setting) in the same EK conditions (EK-Abiotic-24-W) a decrease in the removal by 7% was observed. The abiotic removal mechanisms only contributed to a total mass decay of 6%, whereas the biotic mechanism removed 20% (at 24ºC). The PPCPs more recalcitrant to degradation were CBZ, OXY and TCS. Oppositely E2, SMX e BPA displayed to be more biodegradable. Such results are compatible with previous tests, which suggest that usage of EK in combination with bioremediation vastly improves the efficiency over that of EK remediation alone in removing pollutants from soil. The EK process showed to be an effective option for the remediation of PPCPs in clay soils, which may enhance the degradation of contaminants by two main remediation mechanisms: (i) electrochemical induced degradation and (ii) bioremediation.
id RCAP_4f6ad0a060f77eb4ca6d1ef74abfa68f
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/93002
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factorsElectrokinetic processbioremediationabiotic removalagricultural soilcontaminants of emergent concernDomínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia do AmbienteThe use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation, is a common practice in several countries as it has several benefits, such as decreasing pressure on freshwater sources and reduced nutrient loads to receiving waters. However, wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are not always able to remove all the contaminants present, thus representing a significant risk for environmental contamination. Soil contamination by wastewater may potentially promote contaminants uptake and accumulation by plants and derived products which consequently can affect human health. Pathogens and heavy metals are traditionally the main concern, however contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), and particularly pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs), are gaining scientific and public attention. In the present dissertation, the electrokinetic (EK) process was applied as a remediation technology to an agricultural soil contaminated with a mixture of PPCPs. To better understand the remediation mechanisms involved, different assays were developed to discriminate biotic, abiotic and EK contributions, alone and coupled, to the degradation of the PPCPs. As environmental factors may affect the remediation processes, trials with and without irrigation and at different temperatures were also conducted (18 and 24 ºC). As contaminants, 10 commonly environmentally occurring PPCPs were selected for the study: 17β-estradiol (E2), sulfamethoxazole (SMX), bisphenol A (BPA), ibuprofen (IBU), 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), oxybenzone (OXY), triclosan (TCS), diclofenac (DCF), caffeine (CAF) and carbamazepine (CBZ). These compounds represent the major PPCPs classes and attain diverse physicochemical properties. All experiments were carried out in a lab scale microcosm using a 12h ON/OFF current mode at 20 mA for 4 days (in duplicates). The best remediation results were attained when EK process was applied in biotic conditions at 24ºC and combined with a daily irrigation (EK-Biotic-24-W); these conditions allowed to remove approximately 37% of the total mass on PPCPs in the soil. By eliminating the microbiological contribution to the degradation processes (sterilized soil; abiotic setting) in the same EK conditions (EK-Abiotic-24-W) a decrease in the removal by 7% was observed. The abiotic removal mechanisms only contributed to a total mass decay of 6%, whereas the biotic mechanism removed 20% (at 24ºC). The PPCPs more recalcitrant to degradation were CBZ, OXY and TCS. Oppositely E2, SMX e BPA displayed to be more biodegradable. Such results are compatible with previous tests, which suggest that usage of EK in combination with bioremediation vastly improves the efficiency over that of EK remediation alone in removing pollutants from soil. The EK process showed to be an effective option for the remediation of PPCPs in clay soils, which may enhance the degradation of contaminants by two main remediation mechanisms: (i) electrochemical induced degradation and (ii) bioremediation.Guedes, PaulaRibeiro, AlexandraRUNDionísio, Joana Magalhães2020-02-19T15:13:25Z2019-0520192019-05-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/93002enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-22T17:43:35Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/93002Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:14:52.662250Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factors
title Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factors
spellingShingle Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factors
Dionísio, Joana Magalhães
Electrokinetic process
bioremediation
abiotic removal
agricultural soil
contaminants of emergent concern
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia do Ambiente
title_short Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factors
title_full Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factors
title_fullStr Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factors
title_full_unstemmed Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factors
title_sort Electrokinetic remediation of PPCPs in soil: influence of soil biota and environmental factors
author Dionísio, Joana Magalhães
author_facet Dionísio, Joana Magalhães
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Guedes, Paula
Ribeiro, Alexandra
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dionísio, Joana Magalhães
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Electrokinetic process
bioremediation
abiotic removal
agricultural soil
contaminants of emergent concern
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia do Ambiente
topic Electrokinetic process
bioremediation
abiotic removal
agricultural soil
contaminants of emergent concern
Domínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia do Ambiente
description The use of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation, is a common practice in several countries as it has several benefits, such as decreasing pressure on freshwater sources and reduced nutrient loads to receiving waters. However, wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are not always able to remove all the contaminants present, thus representing a significant risk for environmental contamination. Soil contamination by wastewater may potentially promote contaminants uptake and accumulation by plants and derived products which consequently can affect human health. Pathogens and heavy metals are traditionally the main concern, however contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), and particularly pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs), are gaining scientific and public attention. In the present dissertation, the electrokinetic (EK) process was applied as a remediation technology to an agricultural soil contaminated with a mixture of PPCPs. To better understand the remediation mechanisms involved, different assays were developed to discriminate biotic, abiotic and EK contributions, alone and coupled, to the degradation of the PPCPs. As environmental factors may affect the remediation processes, trials with and without irrigation and at different temperatures were also conducted (18 and 24 ºC). As contaminants, 10 commonly environmentally occurring PPCPs were selected for the study: 17β-estradiol (E2), sulfamethoxazole (SMX), bisphenol A (BPA), ibuprofen (IBU), 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), oxybenzone (OXY), triclosan (TCS), diclofenac (DCF), caffeine (CAF) and carbamazepine (CBZ). These compounds represent the major PPCPs classes and attain diverse physicochemical properties. All experiments were carried out in a lab scale microcosm using a 12h ON/OFF current mode at 20 mA for 4 days (in duplicates). The best remediation results were attained when EK process was applied in biotic conditions at 24ºC and combined with a daily irrigation (EK-Biotic-24-W); these conditions allowed to remove approximately 37% of the total mass on PPCPs in the soil. By eliminating the microbiological contribution to the degradation processes (sterilized soil; abiotic setting) in the same EK conditions (EK-Abiotic-24-W) a decrease in the removal by 7% was observed. The abiotic removal mechanisms only contributed to a total mass decay of 6%, whereas the biotic mechanism removed 20% (at 24ºC). The PPCPs more recalcitrant to degradation were CBZ, OXY and TCS. Oppositely E2, SMX e BPA displayed to be more biodegradable. Such results are compatible with previous tests, which suggest that usage of EK in combination with bioremediation vastly improves the efficiency over that of EK remediation alone in removing pollutants from soil. The EK process showed to be an effective option for the remediation of PPCPs in clay soils, which may enhance the degradation of contaminants by two main remediation mechanisms: (i) electrochemical induced degradation and (ii) bioremediation.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05
2019
2019-05-01T00:00:00Z
2020-02-19T15:13:25Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/93002
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/93002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833596549815336960