A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machines

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Khosravani, Hamid Reza
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Ruano, Antonio, Ferreira, P. M.
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/13292
Summary: The performance of data-driven models such as Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines relies to a good extent on selecting proper data throughout the design phase. This paper addresses a comparison of four unsupervised data selection methods including random, convex hull based, entropy based and a hybrid data selection method. These methods were evaluated on eight benchmarks in classification and regression problems. For classification, Support Vector Machines were used, while for the regression problems, Multi-Layer Perceptrons were employed. Additionally, for each problem type, a non-dominated set of Radial Basis Functions Neural Networks were designed, benefiting from a Multi Objective Genetic Algorithm. The simulation results showed that the convex hull based method and the hybrid method involving convex hull and entropy, obtain better performance than the other methods, and that MOGA designed RBFNNs always perform better than the other models. (C) 2017, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
id RCAP_441f0cbb4ee6e8afc7a51f27fe7fb976
oai_identifier_str oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/13292
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machinesEvolutionary algorithmsMultiobjective optimizationThe performance of data-driven models such as Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines relies to a good extent on selecting proper data throughout the design phase. This paper addresses a comparison of four unsupervised data selection methods including random, convex hull based, entropy based and a hybrid data selection method. These methods were evaluated on eight benchmarks in classification and regression problems. For classification, Support Vector Machines were used, while for the regression problems, Multi-Layer Perceptrons were employed. Additionally, for each problem type, a non-dominated set of Radial Basis Functions Neural Networks were designed, benefiting from a Multi Objective Genetic Algorithm. The simulation results showed that the convex hull based method and the hybrid method involving convex hull and entropy, obtain better performance than the other methods, and that MOGA designed RBFNNs always perform better than the other models. (C) 2017, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Elsevier ScienceSapientiaKhosravani, Hamid RezaRuano, AntonioFerreira, P. M.2019-11-20T15:07:58Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/13292eng2405-896310.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1577info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-18T17:22:53Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/13292Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T20:20:20.289505Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machines
title A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machines
spellingShingle A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machines
Khosravani, Hamid Reza
Evolutionary algorithms
Multiobjective optimization
title_short A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machines
title_full A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machines
title_fullStr A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machines
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machines
title_sort A comparison of four data selection methods for artificial neural networks and support vector machines
author Khosravani, Hamid Reza
author_facet Khosravani, Hamid Reza
Ruano, Antonio
Ferreira, P. M.
author_role author
author2 Ruano, Antonio
Ferreira, P. M.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Khosravani, Hamid Reza
Ruano, Antonio
Ferreira, P. M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Evolutionary algorithms
Multiobjective optimization
topic Evolutionary algorithms
Multiobjective optimization
description The performance of data-driven models such as Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines relies to a good extent on selecting proper data throughout the design phase. This paper addresses a comparison of four unsupervised data selection methods including random, convex hull based, entropy based and a hybrid data selection method. These methods were evaluated on eight benchmarks in classification and regression problems. For classification, Support Vector Machines were used, while for the regression problems, Multi-Layer Perceptrons were employed. Additionally, for each problem type, a non-dominated set of Radial Basis Functions Neural Networks were designed, benefiting from a Multi Objective Genetic Algorithm. The simulation results showed that the convex hull based method and the hybrid method involving convex hull and entropy, obtain better performance than the other methods, and that MOGA designed RBFNNs always perform better than the other models. (C) 2017, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-11-20T15:07:58Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv conference object
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/13292
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/13292
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2405-8963
10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1577
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833598608883056640