Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Bruno
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Fontainhas, Vasco, Caetano, Ana Célia, Ferreira, Aníbal, Gonçalves, Raquel, Bastos, Pedro, Rolanda, Carla
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/28432
Resumo: Objective: malignant colorectal polyp, defined by submucosally invasive adenocarcinoma, is the earliest form of clinically relevant colorectal cancer (CRC). After endoscopic resection additional surgery may be necessary, although decision criteria remain debatable. The objective of this study was to assess oncologic outcomes in terms of locoregional disease and to identify areas of improvement that may facilitate patients´ management.Methods: retrospective study of 40 patients with T1 CRC endoscopically resected between 2007 and 2012. Clinicopathological features were assessed and correlated with residual disease (RD), defined as presence of adenocarcinoma in intestinal wall and/ or lymph nodes.Results: thirty-one patients underwent surgery while 9 were followed-up. After surgery, RD was confirmed in 15 (48.4 %) patients: 8 (53.3 %) wall disease, 5 (33 %) nodal metastasis, and 2 (13.3 %) with both. No recurrence was detected in the follow-up group. The characteristics of the lesions that were associated with DR were sessile configuration (p = 0.03), the degree of differentiation G3 (p = 0.01) and intercepted/indeterminate margins (p = 0.01). Twenty-two patients were operated because of inadequate evaluation, mainly due to piecemeal resection, and half of them were disease free. Postoperative complications were found in 9 (30 %) patients, mainly anastomotic leakage that was associated with rectum anterior resection (p = 0.03).Conclusions: surgery should be considered in the presence of any risk factor for residual disease, while follow-up can be offered in low risk settings. Was also demonstrated a clear need for technical improvement in endoscopic resection and pathology evaluation in order to prevent unnecessary surgeries.
id RCAP_414bab22d05ab0680cdb3e191319b6c6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/28432
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polypsMalignant polypPostoperative complicationsResidualRisk factorsSubmucosal invasionResidual diseaseScience & TechnologyObjective: malignant colorectal polyp, defined by submucosally invasive adenocarcinoma, is the earliest form of clinically relevant colorectal cancer (CRC). After endoscopic resection additional surgery may be necessary, although decision criteria remain debatable. The objective of this study was to assess oncologic outcomes in terms of locoregional disease and to identify areas of improvement that may facilitate patients´ management.Methods: retrospective study of 40 patients with T1 CRC endoscopically resected between 2007 and 2012. Clinicopathological features were assessed and correlated with residual disease (RD), defined as presence of adenocarcinoma in intestinal wall and/ or lymph nodes.Results: thirty-one patients underwent surgery while 9 were followed-up. After surgery, RD was confirmed in 15 (48.4 %) patients: 8 (53.3 %) wall disease, 5 (33 %) nodal metastasis, and 2 (13.3 %) with both. No recurrence was detected in the follow-up group. The characteristics of the lesions that were associated with DR were sessile configuration (p = 0.03), the degree of differentiation G3 (p = 0.01) and intercepted/indeterminate margins (p = 0.01). Twenty-two patients were operated because of inadequate evaluation, mainly due to piecemeal resection, and half of them were disease free. Postoperative complications were found in 9 (30 %) patients, mainly anastomotic leakage that was associated with rectum anterior resection (p = 0.03).Conclusions: surgery should be considered in the presence of any risk factor for residual disease, while follow-up can be offered in low risk settings. Was also demonstrated a clear need for technical improvement in endoscopic resection and pathology evaluation in order to prevent unnecessary surgeries.Arán Ediciones, S.L.Universidade do MinhoGonçalves, BrunoFontainhas, VascoCaetano, Ana CéliaFerreira, AníbalGonçalves, RaquelBastos, PedroRolanda, Carla20132013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/28432eng1130-010810.4321/S1130-0108201300080000324274442http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php/script_sci_serial/pid_1130-0108/lng_es/nr/lng_eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-11T06:02:10Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/28432Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T15:38:57.664935Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps
title Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps
spellingShingle Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps
Gonçalves, Bruno
Malignant polyp
Postoperative complications
Residual
Risk factors
Submucosal invasion
Residual disease
Science & Technology
title_short Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps
title_full Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps
title_fullStr Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps
title_full_unstemmed Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps
title_sort Oncological outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps
author Gonçalves, Bruno
author_facet Gonçalves, Bruno
Fontainhas, Vasco
Caetano, Ana Célia
Ferreira, Aníbal
Gonçalves, Raquel
Bastos, Pedro
Rolanda, Carla
author_role author
author2 Fontainhas, Vasco
Caetano, Ana Célia
Ferreira, Aníbal
Gonçalves, Raquel
Bastos, Pedro
Rolanda, Carla
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Bruno
Fontainhas, Vasco
Caetano, Ana Célia
Ferreira, Aníbal
Gonçalves, Raquel
Bastos, Pedro
Rolanda, Carla
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Malignant polyp
Postoperative complications
Residual
Risk factors
Submucosal invasion
Residual disease
Science & Technology
topic Malignant polyp
Postoperative complications
Residual
Risk factors
Submucosal invasion
Residual disease
Science & Technology
description Objective: malignant colorectal polyp, defined by submucosally invasive adenocarcinoma, is the earliest form of clinically relevant colorectal cancer (CRC). After endoscopic resection additional surgery may be necessary, although decision criteria remain debatable. The objective of this study was to assess oncologic outcomes in terms of locoregional disease and to identify areas of improvement that may facilitate patients´ management.Methods: retrospective study of 40 patients with T1 CRC endoscopically resected between 2007 and 2012. Clinicopathological features were assessed and correlated with residual disease (RD), defined as presence of adenocarcinoma in intestinal wall and/ or lymph nodes.Results: thirty-one patients underwent surgery while 9 were followed-up. After surgery, RD was confirmed in 15 (48.4 %) patients: 8 (53.3 %) wall disease, 5 (33 %) nodal metastasis, and 2 (13.3 %) with both. No recurrence was detected in the follow-up group. The characteristics of the lesions that were associated with DR were sessile configuration (p = 0.03), the degree of differentiation G3 (p = 0.01) and intercepted/indeterminate margins (p = 0.01). Twenty-two patients were operated because of inadequate evaluation, mainly due to piecemeal resection, and half of them were disease free. Postoperative complications were found in 9 (30 %) patients, mainly anastomotic leakage that was associated with rectum anterior resection (p = 0.03).Conclusions: surgery should be considered in the presence of any risk factor for residual disease, while follow-up can be offered in low risk settings. Was also demonstrated a clear need for technical improvement in endoscopic resection and pathology evaluation in order to prevent unnecessary surgeries.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/28432
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/28432
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1130-0108
10.4321/S1130-01082013000800003
24274442
http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php/script_sci_serial/pid_1130-0108/lng_es/nr/lng_en
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Arán Ediciones, S.L.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Arán Ediciones, S.L.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833595446225797120