Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2019 |
| Other Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37522 |
Summary: | Despite the huge efforts to develop efficient technologies for the treatment of recalcitrant biowastes and other emerging pollutants, selecting the most sustainable method among the possible alternatives is still a formidable task. This is mainly because of the integration of technical, economic, environmental, and social criteria in decision-making process. Traditionally, various multi-criteria decision-making approaches have been adopted to integrate innumerable criteria for environmental applications. In this study, we have examined the fuzzy-Delphi approach to evaluate seventeen parameters for integrating technical, economic, environmental and social criteria in order to rank the nine treatment technologies divided in two categories (physico-chemical and biological processes). The results of this study indicated that although efficiency of treatment methods is the most important criterion, but contribution of other sustainability criteria should also be considered because they are of high importance for the selection of sustainable wastewater treatment methods. As per our proposed framework on membrane technologies (among the many other physico-chemical methods) and anaerobic sludge blanket technology (among the biological treatment methods) are the most promising approaches for the treatment of highly polluted emerging industrial pollutants. The findings of this study are fully supported by the consensus achieved by a group of fifty experts from nineteen different countries. Opportunities for the improvement of the methods as per data generated are discussed. |
| id |
RCAP_3eed37f25f5c6997b7ee882c4bedbc5e |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/37522 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluentsSustainabilityFuzzy-Delphi methodologyBiowastesPhysico-chemical methodsMembrane technologiesBiological methodsDespite the huge efforts to develop efficient technologies for the treatment of recalcitrant biowastes and other emerging pollutants, selecting the most sustainable method among the possible alternatives is still a formidable task. This is mainly because of the integration of technical, economic, environmental, and social criteria in decision-making process. Traditionally, various multi-criteria decision-making approaches have been adopted to integrate innumerable criteria for environmental applications. In this study, we have examined the fuzzy-Delphi approach to evaluate seventeen parameters for integrating technical, economic, environmental and social criteria in order to rank the nine treatment technologies divided in two categories (physico-chemical and biological processes). The results of this study indicated that although efficiency of treatment methods is the most important criterion, but contribution of other sustainability criteria should also be considered because they are of high importance for the selection of sustainable wastewater treatment methods. As per our proposed framework on membrane technologies (among the many other physico-chemical methods) and anaerobic sludge blanket technology (among the biological treatment methods) are the most promising approaches for the treatment of highly polluted emerging industrial pollutants. The findings of this study are fully supported by the consensus achieved by a group of fifty experts from nineteen different countries. Opportunities for the improvement of the methods as per data generated are discussed.Elsevier2023-05-05T09:27:32Z2019-08-15T00:00:00Z2019-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/37522eng1385-894710.1016/j.cej.2019.04.010Kamali, MohammadrezaCosta, Maria ElisabeteAminabhavi, Tejraj M.Capela, Isabelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T04:45:40Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/37522Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T14:19:19.855615Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents |
| title |
Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents |
| spellingShingle |
Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents Kamali, Mohammadreza Sustainability Fuzzy-Delphi methodology Biowastes Physico-chemical methods Membrane technologies Biological methods |
| title_short |
Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents |
| title_full |
Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents |
| title_fullStr |
Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents |
| title_sort |
Sustainability of treatment technologies for industrial biowastes effluents |
| author |
Kamali, Mohammadreza |
| author_facet |
Kamali, Mohammadreza Costa, Maria Elisabete Aminabhavi, Tejraj M. Capela, Isabel |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Costa, Maria Elisabete Aminabhavi, Tejraj M. Capela, Isabel |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kamali, Mohammadreza Costa, Maria Elisabete Aminabhavi, Tejraj M. Capela, Isabel |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability Fuzzy-Delphi methodology Biowastes Physico-chemical methods Membrane technologies Biological methods |
| topic |
Sustainability Fuzzy-Delphi methodology Biowastes Physico-chemical methods Membrane technologies Biological methods |
| description |
Despite the huge efforts to develop efficient technologies for the treatment of recalcitrant biowastes and other emerging pollutants, selecting the most sustainable method among the possible alternatives is still a formidable task. This is mainly because of the integration of technical, economic, environmental, and social criteria in decision-making process. Traditionally, various multi-criteria decision-making approaches have been adopted to integrate innumerable criteria for environmental applications. In this study, we have examined the fuzzy-Delphi approach to evaluate seventeen parameters for integrating technical, economic, environmental and social criteria in order to rank the nine treatment technologies divided in two categories (physico-chemical and biological processes). The results of this study indicated that although efficiency of treatment methods is the most important criterion, but contribution of other sustainability criteria should also be considered because they are of high importance for the selection of sustainable wastewater treatment methods. As per our proposed framework on membrane technologies (among the many other physico-chemical methods) and anaerobic sludge blanket technology (among the biological treatment methods) are the most promising approaches for the treatment of highly polluted emerging industrial pollutants. The findings of this study are fully supported by the consensus achieved by a group of fifty experts from nineteen different countries. Opportunities for the improvement of the methods as per data generated are discussed. |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-15T00:00:00Z 2019-08-15 2023-05-05T09:27:32Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37522 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/37522 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1385-8947 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.010 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833594497677656064 |