(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simão, Licínia
Publication Date: 2013
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031
https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582
Summary: Since the 1990s, (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia has been conceptualized by International Relations scholars as being mainly connected to the permanence of regional violent conflicts and the challenges of fragile sovereignty. After 9/11, terrorism as a broad category has also been added to the lexicon. These views place state security at the centre of analysis, and focus mainly on military aspects of security. This article addresses the limitations of analyses of post-Soviet Eurasian security shaped by these two trends and puts forwards critical alternatives to analyse insecurity in this region. Building on insights from critical security studies, namely Ken Booth’s work and his central concept of emancipation, as well as the nexus between human rights and security – human security –, this paper presents a new framework of analysis for regional (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia. The main goal is to reflect on the innovative aspects of this approach in terms of understanding increasingly complex (in)security dynamics in this region, and overcome what have been mainly realist and realpolitik views of regional security.
id RCAP_3d3c223792d4c85f9b633eb8813f2013
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/36031
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling (In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security StudiesPost-Soviet EurasiaCritical security studiesHuman securityInsecurityEmancipationSince the 1990s, (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia has been conceptualized by International Relations scholars as being mainly connected to the permanence of regional violent conflicts and the challenges of fragile sovereignty. After 9/11, terrorism as a broad category has also been added to the lexicon. These views place state security at the centre of analysis, and focus mainly on military aspects of security. This article addresses the limitations of analyses of post-Soviet Eurasian security shaped by these two trends and puts forwards critical alternatives to analyse insecurity in this region. Building on insights from critical security studies, namely Ken Booth’s work and his central concept of emancipation, as well as the nexus between human rights and security – human security –, this paper presents a new framework of analysis for regional (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia. The main goal is to reflect on the innovative aspects of this approach in terms of understanding increasingly complex (in)security dynamics in this region, and overcome what have been mainly realist and realpolitik views of regional security.Centro de Estudos Sociais2013info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582eng1647-0737http://eces.revues.org/1582Simão, Licíniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2021-06-29T10:03:42Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/36031Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T05:07:02.997316Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv (In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies
title (In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies
spellingShingle (In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies
Simão, Licínia
Post-Soviet Eurasia
Critical security studies
Human security
Insecurity
Emancipation
title_short (In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies
title_full (In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies
title_fullStr (In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies
title_full_unstemmed (In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies
title_sort (In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies
author Simão, Licínia
author_facet Simão, Licínia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Simão, Licínia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Post-Soviet Eurasia
Critical security studies
Human security
Insecurity
Emancipation
topic Post-Soviet Eurasia
Critical security studies
Human security
Insecurity
Emancipation
description Since the 1990s, (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia has been conceptualized by International Relations scholars as being mainly connected to the permanence of regional violent conflicts and the challenges of fragile sovereignty. After 9/11, terrorism as a broad category has also been added to the lexicon. These views place state security at the centre of analysis, and focus mainly on military aspects of security. This article addresses the limitations of analyses of post-Soviet Eurasian security shaped by these two trends and puts forwards critical alternatives to analyse insecurity in this region. Building on insights from critical security studies, namely Ken Booth’s work and his central concept of emancipation, as well as the nexus between human rights and security – human security –, this paper presents a new framework of analysis for regional (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia. The main goal is to reflect on the innovative aspects of this approach in terms of understanding increasingly complex (in)security dynamics in this region, and overcome what have been mainly realist and realpolitik views of regional security.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031
https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582
https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582
url https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031
https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1647-0737
http://eces.revues.org/1582
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Sociais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Sociais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833602256384032768