(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2013 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031 https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582 |
Summary: | Since the 1990s, (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia has been conceptualized by International Relations scholars as being mainly connected to the permanence of regional violent conflicts and the challenges of fragile sovereignty. After 9/11, terrorism as a broad category has also been added to the lexicon. These views place state security at the centre of analysis, and focus mainly on military aspects of security. This article addresses the limitations of analyses of post-Soviet Eurasian security shaped by these two trends and puts forwards critical alternatives to analyse insecurity in this region. Building on insights from critical security studies, namely Ken Booth’s work and his central concept of emancipation, as well as the nexus between human rights and security – human security –, this paper presents a new framework of analysis for regional (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia. The main goal is to reflect on the innovative aspects of this approach in terms of understanding increasingly complex (in)security dynamics in this region, and overcome what have been mainly realist and realpolitik views of regional security. |
id |
RCAP_3d3c223792d4c85f9b633eb8813f2013 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/36031 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security StudiesPost-Soviet EurasiaCritical security studiesHuman securityInsecurityEmancipationSince the 1990s, (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia has been conceptualized by International Relations scholars as being mainly connected to the permanence of regional violent conflicts and the challenges of fragile sovereignty. After 9/11, terrorism as a broad category has also been added to the lexicon. These views place state security at the centre of analysis, and focus mainly on military aspects of security. This article addresses the limitations of analyses of post-Soviet Eurasian security shaped by these two trends and puts forwards critical alternatives to analyse insecurity in this region. Building on insights from critical security studies, namely Ken Booth’s work and his central concept of emancipation, as well as the nexus between human rights and security – human security –, this paper presents a new framework of analysis for regional (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia. The main goal is to reflect on the innovative aspects of this approach in terms of understanding increasingly complex (in)security dynamics in this region, and overcome what have been mainly realist and realpolitik views of regional security.Centro de Estudos Sociais2013info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582eng1647-0737http://eces.revues.org/1582Simão, Licíniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2021-06-29T10:03:42Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/36031Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T05:07:02.997316Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies |
title |
(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies |
spellingShingle |
(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies Simão, Licínia Post-Soviet Eurasia Critical security studies Human security Insecurity Emancipation |
title_short |
(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies |
title_full |
(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies |
title_fullStr |
(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies |
title_sort |
(In)security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies |
author |
Simão, Licínia |
author_facet |
Simão, Licínia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Simão, Licínia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Post-Soviet Eurasia Critical security studies Human security Insecurity Emancipation |
topic |
Post-Soviet Eurasia Critical security studies Human security Insecurity Emancipation |
description |
Since the 1990s, (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia has been conceptualized by International Relations scholars as being mainly connected to the permanence of regional violent conflicts and the challenges of fragile sovereignty. After 9/11, terrorism as a broad category has also been added to the lexicon. These views place state security at the centre of analysis, and focus mainly on military aspects of security. This article addresses the limitations of analyses of post-Soviet Eurasian security shaped by these two trends and puts forwards critical alternatives to analyse insecurity in this region. Building on insights from critical security studies, namely Ken Booth’s work and his central concept of emancipation, as well as the nexus between human rights and security – human security –, this paper presents a new framework of analysis for regional (in)security in post-Soviet Eurasia. The main goal is to reflect on the innovative aspects of this approach in terms of understanding increasingly complex (in)security dynamics in this region, and overcome what have been mainly realist and realpolitik views of regional security. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031 https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031 https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582 https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/36031 https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1582 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1647-0737 http://eces.revues.org/1582 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Sociais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Sociais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833602256384032768 |