Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparison
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/105929 https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040840 |
Summary: | An accurate evaluation of the thermal transmittance (U-value) of building envelope elements is fundamental for a reliable assessment of their thermal behaviour and energy e ciency. Simplified analytical methods to estimate the U-value of building elements could be very useful to designers. However, the analytical methods applied to lightweight steel framed (LSF) elements have some specific features, being more challenging to use and to obtain a reliable accurate U-value with. In this work, the main analytical methods available in the literature were identified, the calculation procedures were reviewed and their accuracy was evaluated and compared. With this goal, six analytical methods were used to estimate the U-values of 80 di erent LSF wall models. The obtained analytical U-values were compared with those provided by numerical simulations, which were used as reference U-values. The numerical simulations were performed using a 2D steady-state finite element method (FEM)-based software, THERM. The reliability of these numerical models was ensured by comparison with benchmark values and by an experimental validation. All the evaluated analytical methods showed a quite good accuracy performance, the worst accuracy being found in cold frame walls. The best and worst precisions were found in the Modified Zone Method and in the Gorgolewski Method 2, respectively. Very surprisingly, the ISO 6946 Combined Method showed a better average precision than other two methods, which were specifically developed for LSF elements. |
id |
RCAP_3ab2e8c5fb02584522d07f4cf2568fb8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/105929 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparisonlightweight steel frameLSF wallsthermal transmittanceU-valueanalytical methodscalculation proceduresaccuracyAn accurate evaluation of the thermal transmittance (U-value) of building envelope elements is fundamental for a reliable assessment of their thermal behaviour and energy e ciency. Simplified analytical methods to estimate the U-value of building elements could be very useful to designers. However, the analytical methods applied to lightweight steel framed (LSF) elements have some specific features, being more challenging to use and to obtain a reliable accurate U-value with. In this work, the main analytical methods available in the literature were identified, the calculation procedures were reviewed and their accuracy was evaluated and compared. With this goal, six analytical methods were used to estimate the U-values of 80 di erent LSF wall models. The obtained analytical U-values were compared with those provided by numerical simulations, which were used as reference U-values. The numerical simulations were performed using a 2D steady-state finite element method (FEM)-based software, THERM. The reliability of these numerical models was ensured by comparison with benchmark values and by an experimental validation. All the evaluated analytical methods showed a quite good accuracy performance, the worst accuracy being found in cold frame walls. The best and worst precisions were found in the Modified Zone Method and in the Gorgolewski Method 2, respectively. Very surprisingly, the ISO 6946 Combined Method showed a better average precision than other two methods, which were specifically developed for LSF elements.MDPI2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/105929https://hdl.handle.net/10316/105929https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040840eng1996-1073Santos, PauloLemes, GabrielaMateus, Diogoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2023-03-15T21:32:17Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/105929Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T05:56:21.305283Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparison |
title |
Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparison |
spellingShingle |
Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparison Santos, Paulo lightweight steel frame LSF walls thermal transmittance U-value analytical methods calculation procedures accuracy |
title_short |
Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparison |
title_full |
Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparison |
title_fullStr |
Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparison |
title_sort |
Analytical Methods to Estimate the Thermal Transmittance of LSF Walls: Calculation Procedures Review and Accuracy Comparison |
author |
Santos, Paulo |
author_facet |
Santos, Paulo Lemes, Gabriela Mateus, Diogo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lemes, Gabriela Mateus, Diogo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Paulo Lemes, Gabriela Mateus, Diogo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
lightweight steel frame LSF walls thermal transmittance U-value analytical methods calculation procedures accuracy |
topic |
lightweight steel frame LSF walls thermal transmittance U-value analytical methods calculation procedures accuracy |
description |
An accurate evaluation of the thermal transmittance (U-value) of building envelope elements is fundamental for a reliable assessment of their thermal behaviour and energy e ciency. Simplified analytical methods to estimate the U-value of building elements could be very useful to designers. However, the analytical methods applied to lightweight steel framed (LSF) elements have some specific features, being more challenging to use and to obtain a reliable accurate U-value with. In this work, the main analytical methods available in the literature were identified, the calculation procedures were reviewed and their accuracy was evaluated and compared. With this goal, six analytical methods were used to estimate the U-values of 80 di erent LSF wall models. The obtained analytical U-values were compared with those provided by numerical simulations, which were used as reference U-values. The numerical simulations were performed using a 2D steady-state finite element method (FEM)-based software, THERM. The reliability of these numerical models was ensured by comparison with benchmark values and by an experimental validation. All the evaluated analytical methods showed a quite good accuracy performance, the worst accuracy being found in cold frame walls. The best and worst precisions were found in the Modified Zone Method and in the Gorgolewski Method 2, respectively. Very surprisingly, the ISO 6946 Combined Method showed a better average precision than other two methods, which were specifically developed for LSF elements. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/105929 https://hdl.handle.net/10316/105929 https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040840 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/105929 https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040840 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1996-1073 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833602524445147136 |