Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1 |
Summary: | Introduction: In order to manage the high number of patients with upper limb fractures that require surgical treat‐ ment, it is essential to have a well‐defined structure, in order to promote an adequate response to each type of orthope‐ dic pathology and to fit the reality of all other pathologies. In order to reduce hospital stays and promote better treat‐ ment of patients, our service promoted the deferred treatment of numerous pathologies in the area of traumatology. The aim of the study was to assess the type of pathologies, patient characteristics, degree of satisfaction and pain con‐ trol of patients with upper limb fractures, treated in a deferred manner in our hospital, in 2020, a severely marked year by the global pandemic context by COVID‐19. Methods: We developed a retrospective observational study with the evaluation of 71 patients treated in a deferred manner and who waited at their home for a call for surgical treatment. Results: We recorded an average age of 49 years (14‐71), with 40 males (56.3%). The most frequent diagnoses were distal radius fracture (36.6%; n=26), metacarpal fracture (19.7%, n=14) and phalangeal fractures (11.3%, n=8). The average time from coming to the emergency department until definitive surgical treatment was 7 days and the most frequent anesthetic risk was ASA 2 (in 64.6%). After a telephone call made in May 2021, it was possible to assess 36 of the 65 patients operated, with 89% reporting satisfaction with the possibility of waiting for surgical treatment at home and 92% reporting recommending this type of strategy. About pain control at home, while waiting for surgery, applying the VAS score: the mean was 1.94 (0 – 9). We applied the score (QuickDASH) to all patients with distal radius fractures included in the group, with a mean of 18.2 points (0 – 65.9; SD 18.65). Conclusion: Deferred treatment of upper limb traumatic pathology was satisfactory for patients, who recommended the treatment and allowed pain control throughout the clinical course. |
id |
RCAP_384185ffcef2b3de935f09b9d0d84b63 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:orthopaedicspot.com:article/1 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic ContextTratamento Cirúrgico Diferido de Trauma do Membro Superior em Contexto PandémicoArm Injuries/surgeryArm Injuries/therapyCOVID‐19Fracture Fixation/methodsOrthopedic ProceduresPain ManagementPandemicsRadius FracturesTime FactorsTime‐to‐TreatmentCOVID‐19Fatores de TempoFraturas do RadioFixação de Fratura/métodosGestão da DorLesões do Braço/cirurgiaLesões do Braço/tratamentoPandemiaProcedimentos OrtopédicosTempo para o TratamentoIntroduction: In order to manage the high number of patients with upper limb fractures that require surgical treat‐ ment, it is essential to have a well‐defined structure, in order to promote an adequate response to each type of orthope‐ dic pathology and to fit the reality of all other pathologies. In order to reduce hospital stays and promote better treat‐ ment of patients, our service promoted the deferred treatment of numerous pathologies in the area of traumatology. The aim of the study was to assess the type of pathologies, patient characteristics, degree of satisfaction and pain con‐ trol of patients with upper limb fractures, treated in a deferred manner in our hospital, in 2020, a severely marked year by the global pandemic context by COVID‐19. Methods: We developed a retrospective observational study with the evaluation of 71 patients treated in a deferred manner and who waited at their home for a call for surgical treatment. Results: We recorded an average age of 49 years (14‐71), with 40 males (56.3%). The most frequent diagnoses were distal radius fracture (36.6%; n=26), metacarpal fracture (19.7%, n=14) and phalangeal fractures (11.3%, n=8). The average time from coming to the emergency department until definitive surgical treatment was 7 days and the most frequent anesthetic risk was ASA 2 (in 64.6%). After a telephone call made in May 2021, it was possible to assess 36 of the 65 patients operated, with 89% reporting satisfaction with the possibility of waiting for surgical treatment at home and 92% reporting recommending this type of strategy. About pain control at home, while waiting for surgery, applying the VAS score: the mean was 1.94 (0 – 9). We applied the score (QuickDASH) to all patients with distal radius fractures included in the group, with a mean of 18.2 points (0 – 65.9; SD 18.65). Conclusion: Deferred treatment of upper limb traumatic pathology was satisfactory for patients, who recommended the treatment and allowed pain control throughout the clinical course.Introdução: Com o objetivo de gerir o elevado número de doentes com fraturas do membro superior que requerem tratamento cirúrgico, é essencial a existência de uma estrutura bem definida, com o intuito de promover uma resposta adequada a cada tipo de patologia ortopédica e enquadrar na realidade de todas as outras patologias. Com um intuito de promover uma diminuição dos tempos de internamento e promover um melhor tratamento dos doentes, o nosso serviço promoveu o tratamento diferido de inúmeras patologias na área da traumatologia. O objetivo do estudo foi o de avaliar o tipo de patologias, características dos doentes, grau de satisfação e controlo da dor dos doentes com fraturas do membro superior, tratados de modo diferido no nosso centro hospitalar, no ano de 2020, um ano severamente marcado pelo contexto pandémico mundial pelo COVID‐19. Métodos: Desenvolvemos um estudo observacional retrospetivo com a avaliação de 71 doentes tratados de modo diferido e que aguardaram na sua residência a chamada para tratamento cirúrgico. Resultados: Registamos uma média de idades de 49 anos (14‐71), sendo 40 do género masculino (56,3%). Os diagnósticos mais frequentes foram fratura do radio distal (36,6%; n=26), fratura de metacarpianos (19,7%, n=14) e fraturas de falanges (11,3%, n=8). O tempo médio deste a vinda ao serviço de urgência até ao tratamento cirúrgico definitivo foi de 7 dias e o risco anestésico mais frequente foi ASA 2 (em 64,6%). Após contacto telefónico realizado em Maio de 2021, foi possível avaliar 36 dos 65 doentes operados, sendo que 89% referiram satisfação com a possibilidade de aguardar o tratamento cirúrgico no domicílio e 92% referiu recomendar este tipo de estratégia. Relativamente ao controlo da dor no domicílio, enquanto aguardavam pela cirurgia, aplicando o score VAS: a média foi de 1,94 (0 – 9). Aplicamos o score (QuickDASH) a todos os doentes com fraturas do rádio distal incluídas no grupo, com uma média de 18,2 pontos (0 – 65,9; DP 18,65). Conclusão: O tratamento diferido de patologia traumática do membro superior foi satisfatório para os doentes, que recomendam o tratamento e permitiram um controlo da dor em todo o curso clínico. Orthopaedic SPOTOrthopaedic SPOT2024-01-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1Orthopaedic SPOT; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January - April; 12-16Orthopaedic SPOT; Vol. 1 N.º 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril; 12-162976-0216reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1/1Copyright (c) 2023 Orthopaedic SPOTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTelo Ramos, NunoRelvas, MiguelAlmeida, JoanaDuarte Silva, JoãoVeludo, VitorinoNogueira de Sousa, AntónioVidinha, Vitor2024-06-08T11:00:19Zoai:orthopaedicspot.com:article/1Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:24:58.609568Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context Tratamento Cirúrgico Diferido de Trauma do Membro Superior em Contexto Pandémico |
title |
Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context |
spellingShingle |
Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context Telo Ramos, Nuno Arm Injuries/surgery Arm Injuries/therapy COVID‐19 Fracture Fixation/methods Orthopedic Procedures Pain Management Pandemics Radius Fractures Time Factors Time‐to‐Treatment COVID‐19 Fatores de Tempo Fraturas do Radio Fixação de Fratura/métodos Gestão da Dor Lesões do Braço/cirurgia Lesões do Braço/tratamento Pandemia Procedimentos Ortopédicos Tempo para o Tratamento |
title_short |
Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context |
title_full |
Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context |
title_fullStr |
Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context |
title_sort |
Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context |
author |
Telo Ramos, Nuno |
author_facet |
Telo Ramos, Nuno Relvas, Miguel Almeida, Joana Duarte Silva, João Veludo, Vitorino Nogueira de Sousa, António Vidinha, Vitor |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Relvas, Miguel Almeida, Joana Duarte Silva, João Veludo, Vitorino Nogueira de Sousa, António Vidinha, Vitor |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Telo Ramos, Nuno Relvas, Miguel Almeida, Joana Duarte Silva, João Veludo, Vitorino Nogueira de Sousa, António Vidinha, Vitor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arm Injuries/surgery Arm Injuries/therapy COVID‐19 Fracture Fixation/methods Orthopedic Procedures Pain Management Pandemics Radius Fractures Time Factors Time‐to‐Treatment COVID‐19 Fatores de Tempo Fraturas do Radio Fixação de Fratura/métodos Gestão da Dor Lesões do Braço/cirurgia Lesões do Braço/tratamento Pandemia Procedimentos Ortopédicos Tempo para o Tratamento |
topic |
Arm Injuries/surgery Arm Injuries/therapy COVID‐19 Fracture Fixation/methods Orthopedic Procedures Pain Management Pandemics Radius Fractures Time Factors Time‐to‐Treatment COVID‐19 Fatores de Tempo Fraturas do Radio Fixação de Fratura/métodos Gestão da Dor Lesões do Braço/cirurgia Lesões do Braço/tratamento Pandemia Procedimentos Ortopédicos Tempo para o Tratamento |
description |
Introduction: In order to manage the high number of patients with upper limb fractures that require surgical treat‐ ment, it is essential to have a well‐defined structure, in order to promote an adequate response to each type of orthope‐ dic pathology and to fit the reality of all other pathologies. In order to reduce hospital stays and promote better treat‐ ment of patients, our service promoted the deferred treatment of numerous pathologies in the area of traumatology. The aim of the study was to assess the type of pathologies, patient characteristics, degree of satisfaction and pain con‐ trol of patients with upper limb fractures, treated in a deferred manner in our hospital, in 2020, a severely marked year by the global pandemic context by COVID‐19. Methods: We developed a retrospective observational study with the evaluation of 71 patients treated in a deferred manner and who waited at their home for a call for surgical treatment. Results: We recorded an average age of 49 years (14‐71), with 40 males (56.3%). The most frequent diagnoses were distal radius fracture (36.6%; n=26), metacarpal fracture (19.7%, n=14) and phalangeal fractures (11.3%, n=8). The average time from coming to the emergency department until definitive surgical treatment was 7 days and the most frequent anesthetic risk was ASA 2 (in 64.6%). After a telephone call made in May 2021, it was possible to assess 36 of the 65 patients operated, with 89% reporting satisfaction with the possibility of waiting for surgical treatment at home and 92% reporting recommending this type of strategy. About pain control at home, while waiting for surgery, applying the VAS score: the mean was 1.94 (0 – 9). We applied the score (QuickDASH) to all patients with distal radius fractures included in the group, with a mean of 18.2 points (0 – 65.9; SD 18.65). Conclusion: Deferred treatment of upper limb traumatic pathology was satisfactory for patients, who recommended the treatment and allowed pain control throughout the clinical course. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-21 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1 |
url |
https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1 https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1/1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Orthopaedic SPOT info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Orthopaedic SPOT |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Orthopaedic SPOT Orthopaedic SPOT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Orthopaedic SPOT Orthopaedic SPOT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Orthopaedic SPOT; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January - April; 12-16 Orthopaedic SPOT; Vol. 1 N.º 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril; 12-16 2976-0216 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833593733728174080 |