Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Telo Ramos, Nuno
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Relvas, Miguel, Almeida, Joana, Duarte Silva, João, Veludo, Vitorino, Nogueira de Sousa, António, Vidinha, Vitor
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1
Summary: Introduction: In order to manage the high number of patients with upper limb fractures that require surgical treat‐ ment, it is essential to have a well‐defined structure, in order to promote an adequate response to each type of orthope‐ dic pathology and to fit the reality of all other pathologies. In order to reduce hospital stays and promote better treat‐ ment of patients, our service promoted the deferred treatment of numerous pathologies in the area of traumatology. The aim of the study was to assess the type of pathologies, patient characteristics, degree of satisfaction and pain con‐ trol of patients with upper limb fractures, treated in a deferred manner in our hospital, in 2020, a severely marked year by the global pandemic context by COVID‐19. Methods: We developed a retrospective observational study with the evaluation of 71 patients treated in a deferred manner and who waited at their home for a call for surgical treatment. Results: We recorded an average age of 49 years (14‐71), with 40 males (56.3%). The most frequent diagnoses were distal radius fracture (36.6%; n=26), metacarpal fracture (19.7%, n=14) and phalangeal fractures (11.3%, n=8). The average time from coming to the emergency department until definitive surgical treatment was 7 days and the most frequent anesthetic risk was ASA 2 (in 64.6%). After a telephone call made in May 2021, it was possible to assess 36 of the 65 patients operated, with 89% reporting satisfaction with the possibility of waiting for surgical treatment at home and 92% reporting recommending this type of strategy. About pain control at home, while waiting for surgery, applying the VAS score: the mean was 1.94 (0 – 9). We applied the score (QuickDASH) to all patients with distal radius fractures included in the group, with a mean of 18.2 points (0 – 65.9; SD 18.65). Conclusion: Deferred treatment of upper limb traumatic pathology was satisfactory for patients, who recommended the treatment and allowed pain control throughout the clinical course.
id RCAP_384185ffcef2b3de935f09b9d0d84b63
oai_identifier_str oai:orthopaedicspot.com:article/1
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic ContextTratamento Cirúrgico Diferido de Trauma do Membro Superior em Contexto PandémicoArm Injuries/surgeryArm Injuries/therapyCOVID‐19Fracture Fixation/methodsOrthopedic ProceduresPain ManagementPandemicsRadius FracturesTime FactorsTime‐to‐TreatmentCOVID‐19Fatores de TempoFraturas do RadioFixação de Fratura/métodosGestão da DorLesões do Braço/cirurgiaLesões do Braço/tratamentoPandemiaProcedimentos OrtopédicosTempo para o TratamentoIntroduction: In order to manage the high number of patients with upper limb fractures that require surgical treat‐ ment, it is essential to have a well‐defined structure, in order to promote an adequate response to each type of orthope‐ dic pathology and to fit the reality of all other pathologies. In order to reduce hospital stays and promote better treat‐ ment of patients, our service promoted the deferred treatment of numerous pathologies in the area of traumatology. The aim of the study was to assess the type of pathologies, patient characteristics, degree of satisfaction and pain con‐ trol of patients with upper limb fractures, treated in a deferred manner in our hospital, in 2020, a severely marked year by the global pandemic context by COVID‐19. Methods: We developed a retrospective observational study with the evaluation of 71 patients treated in a deferred manner and who waited at their home for a call for surgical treatment. Results: We recorded an average age of 49 years (14‐71), with 40 males (56.3%). The most frequent diagnoses were distal radius fracture (36.6%; n=26), metacarpal fracture (19.7%, n=14) and phalangeal fractures (11.3%, n=8). The average time from coming to the emergency department until definitive surgical treatment was 7 days and the most frequent anesthetic risk was ASA 2 (in 64.6%). After a telephone call made in May 2021, it was possible to assess 36 of the 65 patients operated, with 89% reporting satisfaction with the possibility of waiting for surgical treatment at home and 92% reporting recommending this type of strategy. About pain control at home, while waiting for surgery, applying the VAS score: the mean was 1.94 (0 – 9). We applied the score (QuickDASH) to all patients with distal radius fractures included in the group, with a mean of 18.2 points (0 – 65.9; SD 18.65). Conclusion: Deferred treatment of upper limb traumatic pathology was satisfactory for patients, who recommended the treatment and allowed pain control throughout the clinical course.Introdução: Com o objetivo de gerir o elevado número de doentes com fraturas do membro superior que requerem tratamento cirúrgico, é essencial a existência de uma estrutura bem definida, com o intuito de promover uma resposta adequada a cada tipo de patologia ortopédica e enquadrar na realidade de todas as outras patologias. Com um intuito de promover uma diminuição dos tempos de internamento e promover um melhor tratamento dos doentes, o nosso serviço promoveu o tratamento diferido de inúmeras patologias na área da traumatologia. O objetivo do estudo foi o de avaliar o tipo de patologias, características dos doentes, grau de satisfação e controlo da dor dos doentes com fraturas do membro superior, tratados de modo diferido no nosso centro hospitalar, no ano de 2020, um ano severamente marcado pelo contexto pandémico mundial pelo COVID‐19. Métodos: Desenvolvemos um estudo observacional retrospetivo com a avaliação de 71 doentes tratados de modo diferido e que aguardaram na sua residência a chamada para tratamento cirúrgico. Resultados: Registamos uma média de idades de 49 anos (14‐71), sendo 40 do género masculino (56,3%). Os diagnósticos mais frequentes foram fratura do radio distal (36,6%; n=26), fratura de metacarpianos (19,7%, n=14) e fraturas de falanges (11,3%, n=8). O tempo médio deste a vinda ao serviço de urgência até ao tratamento cirúrgico definitivo foi de 7 dias e o risco anestésico mais frequente foi ASA 2 (em 64,6%). Após contacto telefónico realizado em Maio de 2021, foi possível avaliar 36 dos 65 doentes operados, sendo que 89% referiram satisfação com a possibilidade de aguardar o tratamento cirúrgico no domicílio e 92% referiu recomendar este tipo de estratégia. Relativamente ao controlo da dor no domicílio, enquanto aguardavam pela cirurgia, aplicando o score VAS: a média foi de 1,94 (0 – 9). Aplicamos o score (QuickDASH) a todos os doentes com fraturas do rádio distal incluídas no grupo, com uma média de 18,2 pontos (0 – 65,9; DP 18,65). Conclusão: O tratamento diferido de patologia traumática do membro superior foi satisfatório para os doentes, que recomendam o tratamento e permitiram um controlo da dor em todo o curso clínico.  Orthopaedic SPOTOrthopaedic SPOT2024-01-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1Orthopaedic SPOT; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January - April; 12-16Orthopaedic SPOT; Vol. 1 N.º 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril; 12-162976-0216reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1/1Copyright (c) 2023 Orthopaedic SPOTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTelo Ramos, NunoRelvas, MiguelAlmeida, JoanaDuarte Silva, JoãoVeludo, VitorinoNogueira de Sousa, AntónioVidinha, Vitor2024-06-08T11:00:19Zoai:orthopaedicspot.com:article/1Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:24:58.609568Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context
Tratamento Cirúrgico Diferido de Trauma do Membro Superior em Contexto Pandémico
title Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context
spellingShingle Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context
Telo Ramos, Nuno
Arm Injuries/surgery
Arm Injuries/therapy
COVID‐19
Fracture Fixation/methods
Orthopedic Procedures
Pain Management
Pandemics
Radius Fractures
Time Factors
Time‐to‐Treatment
COVID‐19
Fatores de Tempo
Fraturas do Radio
Fixação de Fratura/métodos
Gestão da Dor
Lesões do Braço/cirurgia
Lesões do Braço/tratamento
Pandemia
Procedimentos Ortopédicos
Tempo para o Tratamento
title_short Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context
title_full Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context
title_fullStr Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context
title_full_unstemmed Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context
title_sort Deferred Surgical Treatment of Upper Limb Trauma in a Pandemic Context
author Telo Ramos, Nuno
author_facet Telo Ramos, Nuno
Relvas, Miguel
Almeida, Joana
Duarte Silva, João
Veludo, Vitorino
Nogueira de Sousa, António
Vidinha, Vitor
author_role author
author2 Relvas, Miguel
Almeida, Joana
Duarte Silva, João
Veludo, Vitorino
Nogueira de Sousa, António
Vidinha, Vitor
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Telo Ramos, Nuno
Relvas, Miguel
Almeida, Joana
Duarte Silva, João
Veludo, Vitorino
Nogueira de Sousa, António
Vidinha, Vitor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arm Injuries/surgery
Arm Injuries/therapy
COVID‐19
Fracture Fixation/methods
Orthopedic Procedures
Pain Management
Pandemics
Radius Fractures
Time Factors
Time‐to‐Treatment
COVID‐19
Fatores de Tempo
Fraturas do Radio
Fixação de Fratura/métodos
Gestão da Dor
Lesões do Braço/cirurgia
Lesões do Braço/tratamento
Pandemia
Procedimentos Ortopédicos
Tempo para o Tratamento
topic Arm Injuries/surgery
Arm Injuries/therapy
COVID‐19
Fracture Fixation/methods
Orthopedic Procedures
Pain Management
Pandemics
Radius Fractures
Time Factors
Time‐to‐Treatment
COVID‐19
Fatores de Tempo
Fraturas do Radio
Fixação de Fratura/métodos
Gestão da Dor
Lesões do Braço/cirurgia
Lesões do Braço/tratamento
Pandemia
Procedimentos Ortopédicos
Tempo para o Tratamento
description Introduction: In order to manage the high number of patients with upper limb fractures that require surgical treat‐ ment, it is essential to have a well‐defined structure, in order to promote an adequate response to each type of orthope‐ dic pathology and to fit the reality of all other pathologies. In order to reduce hospital stays and promote better treat‐ ment of patients, our service promoted the deferred treatment of numerous pathologies in the area of traumatology. The aim of the study was to assess the type of pathologies, patient characteristics, degree of satisfaction and pain con‐ trol of patients with upper limb fractures, treated in a deferred manner in our hospital, in 2020, a severely marked year by the global pandemic context by COVID‐19. Methods: We developed a retrospective observational study with the evaluation of 71 patients treated in a deferred manner and who waited at their home for a call for surgical treatment. Results: We recorded an average age of 49 years (14‐71), with 40 males (56.3%). The most frequent diagnoses were distal radius fracture (36.6%; n=26), metacarpal fracture (19.7%, n=14) and phalangeal fractures (11.3%, n=8). The average time from coming to the emergency department until definitive surgical treatment was 7 days and the most frequent anesthetic risk was ASA 2 (in 64.6%). After a telephone call made in May 2021, it was possible to assess 36 of the 65 patients operated, with 89% reporting satisfaction with the possibility of waiting for surgical treatment at home and 92% reporting recommending this type of strategy. About pain control at home, while waiting for surgery, applying the VAS score: the mean was 1.94 (0 – 9). We applied the score (QuickDASH) to all patients with distal radius fractures included in the group, with a mean of 18.2 points (0 – 65.9; SD 18.65). Conclusion: Deferred treatment of upper limb traumatic pathology was satisfactory for patients, who recommended the treatment and allowed pain control throughout the clinical course.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1
url https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1
https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1/1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Orthopaedic SPOT
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Orthopaedic SPOT
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Orthopaedic SPOT
Orthopaedic SPOT
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Orthopaedic SPOT
Orthopaedic SPOT
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Orthopaedic SPOT; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January - April; 12-16
Orthopaedic SPOT; Vol. 1 N.º 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril; 12-16
2976-0216
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593733728174080