Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo, Ana Sofia
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Nobre, Ana Rita, Portugal, Edite, Branquinho, Francisco, Guimarães, Arnaldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.320
Resumo: Introduction: Larynx cancer represent about 30% of head and neck tumors, and 90% are squamous cell carcinomas. Discrepancies have been reported in clinical and pathological TNM staging in larynx cancer in several studies.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 179 patients undergoing laryngectomy between January 2009 and December 2014 in IPOFG of Coimbra. Results: With regard to the extent of the tumor (T), the restaging rate was 43.7%. The sensitivity in the detection of thyroid cartilage invasion or pre-epiglottic space was 55.6% and specificity of 83.4%. With regard to the cervical lymph nodes metastasis the re-staging rate was 36.7%. The sensitivity in the detection of cervical metastases was 85.1% and specificity of 78.5%.Conclusion: Similar to values from other consulted studies, we consider that the reclassification rate is high. The combination of CT data with those from MRI in cases of doubt may improve results. In cases of doubt we consider prudent to opt for surgical treatment so we have a more accurate staging. We emphasize the importance of follow-up taking into account the existence of significant false negatives.
id RCAP_2e12736ae5f9e91c5185f85d179b77ea
oai_identifier_str oai:journalsporl.com:article/2790
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumorsEstadiamento clínico vs. Patológico em tumores da LaringeClinical stagingPathological stagingsquamous cell carcinomaLarynx cancerIntroduction: Larynx cancer represent about 30% of head and neck tumors, and 90% are squamous cell carcinomas. Discrepancies have been reported in clinical and pathological TNM staging in larynx cancer in several studies.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 179 patients undergoing laryngectomy between January 2009 and December 2014 in IPOFG of Coimbra. Results: With regard to the extent of the tumor (T), the restaging rate was 43.7%. The sensitivity in the detection of thyroid cartilage invasion or pre-epiglottic space was 55.6% and specificity of 83.4%. With regard to the cervical lymph nodes metastasis the re-staging rate was 36.7%. The sensitivity in the detection of cervical metastases was 85.1% and specificity of 78.5%.Conclusion: Similar to values from other consulted studies, we consider that the reclassification rate is high. The combination of CT data with those from MRI in cases of doubt may improve results. In cases of doubt we consider prudent to opt for surgical treatment so we have a more accurate staging. We emphasize the importance of follow-up taking into account the existence of significant false negatives.Introdução: Os tumores da laringe representam cerca de 30% das neoplasias de cabeça e pescoço, sendo que 90% destes são carcinomas de células escamosas. Têm sido reportadas discrepâncias no estadiamento TNM clínico e patológico nos tumores da laringe em vários estudos.Material e Métodos: Análise retrospetiva de 179 doentes submetidos a laringectomia entre Janeiro de 2009 e Dezembro de 2014 no IPOFG de Coimbra.Resultados: Relativamente à extensão do tumor, a taxa de re-estadiamento foi 43,7%. A sensibilidade na deteção de invasão da cartilagem tiroideia ou espaço pré-epiglótico foi de 55,6% e a especificidade de 83,4%. Relativamente à metastização ganglionar cervical a taxa de re-estadiamento foi de 36,7%. A sensibilidade na deteção de metástases cervicais foi de 85,1% e a especificidade de 78,5%.Conclusão: A taxa de reclassificação é elevada. Salienta-se a importância do follow-up tendo em consideração a existência significativa de falsos negativos.Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço2016-04-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.320https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.320Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery; Vol. 54 No. 1 (2016): Março; 33-37Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 54 Núm. 1 (2016): Março; 33-37Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia-Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 54 N.º 1 (2016): Março; 33-372184-6499reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2790https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2790/793Melo, Ana SofiaNobre, Ana RitaPortugal, EditeBranquinho, FranciscoGuimarães, Arnaldoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T13:00:17Zoai:journalsporl.com:article/2790Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:54:25.282713Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumors
Estadiamento clínico vs. Patológico em tumores da Laringe
title Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumors
spellingShingle Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumors
Melo, Ana Sofia
Clinical staging
Pathological staging
squamous cell carcinoma
Larynx cancer
title_short Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumors
title_full Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumors
title_fullStr Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumors
title_full_unstemmed Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumors
title_sort Clinical vs. pathological staging in larynx tumors
author Melo, Ana Sofia
author_facet Melo, Ana Sofia
Nobre, Ana Rita
Portugal, Edite
Branquinho, Francisco
Guimarães, Arnaldo
author_role author
author2 Nobre, Ana Rita
Portugal, Edite
Branquinho, Francisco
Guimarães, Arnaldo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo, Ana Sofia
Nobre, Ana Rita
Portugal, Edite
Branquinho, Francisco
Guimarães, Arnaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clinical staging
Pathological staging
squamous cell carcinoma
Larynx cancer
topic Clinical staging
Pathological staging
squamous cell carcinoma
Larynx cancer
description Introduction: Larynx cancer represent about 30% of head and neck tumors, and 90% are squamous cell carcinomas. Discrepancies have been reported in clinical and pathological TNM staging in larynx cancer in several studies.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 179 patients undergoing laryngectomy between January 2009 and December 2014 in IPOFG of Coimbra. Results: With regard to the extent of the tumor (T), the restaging rate was 43.7%. The sensitivity in the detection of thyroid cartilage invasion or pre-epiglottic space was 55.6% and specificity of 83.4%. With regard to the cervical lymph nodes metastasis the re-staging rate was 36.7%. The sensitivity in the detection of cervical metastases was 85.1% and specificity of 78.5%.Conclusion: Similar to values from other consulted studies, we consider that the reclassification rate is high. The combination of CT data with those from MRI in cases of doubt may improve results. In cases of doubt we consider prudent to opt for surgical treatment so we have a more accurate staging. We emphasize the importance of follow-up taking into account the existence of significant false negatives.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.320
https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.320
url https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.320
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2790
https://journalsporl.com/index.php/sporl/article/view/2790/793
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery; Vol. 54 No. 1 (2016): Março; 33-37
Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 54 Núm. 1 (2016): Março; 33-37
Revista Portuguesa de Otorrinolaringologia-Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço; Vol. 54 N.º 1 (2016): Março; 33-37
2184-6499
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597047206313984