Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Figueiredo, Isabel V., et al.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/107805
https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236
Summary: The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?
id RCAP_29cd3d8fda56a10e976e3e44ffcb19f8
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/107805
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewersPeer ReviewPeer Review, ResearchOpen Access PublishingPeriodicals as TopicThe peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/107805https://hdl.handle.net/10316/107805https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236eng1885-642XFernandez-Llimos, FernandoFigueiredo, Isabel V.et al.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2023-08-02T11:52:31Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/107805Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T05:58:50.558948Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
spellingShingle Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Peer Review
Peer Review, Research
Open Access Publishing
Periodicals as Topic
title_short Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title_full Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title_fullStr Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title_full_unstemmed Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title_sort Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
author Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
author_facet Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Figueiredo, Isabel V.
et al.
author_role author
author2 Figueiredo, Isabel V.
et al.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Figueiredo, Isabel V.
et al.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peer Review
Peer Review, Research
Open Access Publishing
Periodicals as Topic
topic Peer Review
Peer Review, Research
Open Access Publishing
Periodicals as Topic
description The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10316/107805
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/107805
https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236
url https://hdl.handle.net/10316/107805
https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1885-642X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833602537190588416