William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2011 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i13.10143 |
Summary: | The German humanist Jodocus Willich (1502‐1552) published in Wittenberg 1538 a Latin translation of Physiognomonia by Pseudo Aristotle (3rd Century BC), which is preceded by a Oratio in laudem physiognomoniae that, in fact, had been the praelectio to a course about that classical work he had imparted at the University Viadrina of Frankfurt an der Oder in the summer of 1536. This text is the only known speech devoted to a systematic praise of discipline, with special emphasis on its various practical utilities: individual, social, academic, artistic, literary. Hereby, the Latin text duly corrected is presented, together with its translation into Spanish and a detailed set of notes to clarify the speech and its context as much as possible. |
id |
RCAP_25df8ff34971b0e641f9d7832ca409da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/10143 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and RomeWilliam A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and RomeThe German humanist Jodocus Willich (1502‐1552) published in Wittenberg 1538 a Latin translation of Physiognomonia by Pseudo Aristotle (3rd Century BC), which is preceded by a Oratio in laudem physiognomoniae that, in fact, had been the praelectio to a course about that classical work he had imparted at the University Viadrina of Frankfurt an der Oder in the summer of 1536. This text is the only known speech devoted to a systematic praise of discipline, with special emphasis on its various practical utilities: individual, social, academic, artistic, literary. Hereby, the Latin text duly corrected is presented, together with its translation into Spanish and a detailed set of notes to clarify the speech and its context as much as possible.El humanista alemán Jodocus Willich (1502‐1552) publicó en Wittenberg 1538 una traducción latina de los Physiognomonia de Pseudo Aristóteles (siglo III a.C.), a la que antepuso una Oratio in laudem physiognomoniae que, en realidad, había sido la praelectio a un curso que sobre tal obra clásica había impartido en la Universidad Viadrina de Frankfurt an der Oder en el verano de 1536. El texto viene a ser el único discurso conocido que se dedica a un encomio sistemático de la disciplina, con especial insistencia en sus diversas utilidades prácticas: individual, social, académica, artística, literaria.Presentamos aquí el texto latino debidamente corregido, su traducción al castellano y una detallada anotación que aclare al máximo el discurso y su contexto.L’humaniste allemand Jodocus Willich (1502‐1552) publia à Wittenberg 1538 une traduction latine de Physiognomonica du Pseudo‐Aristote (IIIe siècle av. J.C.), à laquelle il antéposa une Oratio in laudem physiognomoniae qui, en fait, avait été la praelectio à un cours qu’il avait fait sur cette oeuvre classique à l’Université de Viadrina à Frankfort‐sur‐lʹOder, l’été 1936. Ce texte est donc le seul discours connu qui fait un panégyrique systématique de la discipline, en insistant sur ses multiples utilités pratiques: individuelle, sociale, académique, artistique, littéraire. Dans la mesure où nous voulons expliquer, le plus possible, le discours et son contexte, nous présentons le texte latin avec les corrections respectives, la traduction en castillan et les notes détaillées.Este livro é o resultado de um colóquio realizado em 2006 na Universidade de Cincinnati, intitulado “Constructing ‘Literacy’ among the Greeks and Romans”, cujo objectivo principal se centra na defesa de uma nova linha de interpretação dos fenómenos relacionados com as diferentes formas de ‘letramento’ na Antiguidade clássica.Trata-se de um marco definitivo no estudo da escrita e da oralidade que iguala e ultrapassa nas suas ambições o eminente estudo de William V. Harris ‘Ancient Literacy’ (1989) que se baseia numa abordagem quantitativa do (an)alfabetismo grecoromano.Por seu turno, os catorze ensaios coligidos neste renovado contributo completam o estudo de Harris nomeadamente no que diz respeito às práticas sociais, culturais e políticas estritamente enraizadas nos fenómenos de leitura e escrita. A palavra ‘Literacy’ no plural reflecte claramente a vontade de expor a complexidade sub-jacente a estas práticas que os autores tentam estudar através de uma análise dos vários contextos de produção, percepção e recepção textuais.(...)Universidade de Aveiro2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i13.10143https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i13.10143Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; No 13 (2011); 267-270Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; Núm. 13 (2011); 267-270Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; No 13 (2011); 267-270Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; n.º 13 (2011); 267-2702183-43340874-5498reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/agora/article/view/10143https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/agora/article/view/10143/6609Machado, Eduardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-01-27T10:43:39Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/10143Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:42:04.009062Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome |
title |
William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome |
spellingShingle |
William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome Machado, Eduardo |
title_short |
William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome |
title_full |
William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome |
title_fullStr |
William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome |
title_full_unstemmed |
William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome |
title_sort |
William A. Johnson, Holt N. Parker (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome |
author |
Machado, Eduardo |
author_facet |
Machado, Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Machado, Eduardo |
description |
The German humanist Jodocus Willich (1502‐1552) published in Wittenberg 1538 a Latin translation of Physiognomonia by Pseudo Aristotle (3rd Century BC), which is preceded by a Oratio in laudem physiognomoniae that, in fact, had been the praelectio to a course about that classical work he had imparted at the University Viadrina of Frankfurt an der Oder in the summer of 1536. This text is the only known speech devoted to a systematic praise of discipline, with special emphasis on its various practical utilities: individual, social, academic, artistic, literary. Hereby, the Latin text duly corrected is presented, together with its translation into Spanish and a detailed set of notes to clarify the speech and its context as much as possible. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i13.10143 https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i13.10143 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i13.10143 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/agora/article/view/10143 https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/agora/article/view/10143/6609 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Aveiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Aveiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; No 13 (2011); 267-270 Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; Núm. 13 (2011); 267-270 Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; No 13 (2011); 267-270 Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; n.º 13 (2011); 267-270 2183-4334 0874-5498 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833598268070690816 |