How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International Survey

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Araújo-Martins,Miguel
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Pimentel-Nunes,Pedro, Libânio,Diogo, Borges-Canha,Marta, Dinis-Ribeiro,Mário
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452020000100001
Summary: Background and Study Aim: Superficial gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms can be treated with endoscopic mucosal resec-tion (EMR) and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). These techniques are widely used in Eastern countries; how-ever, its use in the West is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current implementation of ESD in Western countries. Methods: Western endoscopists (n = 279) who published papers related to EMR/ESD between 2005 and 2017 were asked to complete an online survey from Decem-ber 2017 to February 2018. Results: A total of 58 endosco-pists (21%) completed the survey. Thirty performed ESD in the esophagus (52%), 45 in the stomach (78%), 36 in the co­ lorectum (62%), and 6 in the duodenum (10%). The median total number of lesions ever treated per endoscopist was 190, with a median number per endoscopist in 2016 of 41 (7 [IQR 1-21], 6 [IQR 4-16], and 28 [5-63] in the esophagus, in the stomach, and in the colon and rectum, respectively). En bloc resection rates were 97% in the esophagus, 95% in the stomach, and 84% in the colorectum. Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 88, 91, and 81%, respectively. Curative rates were 69, 70, and 67%, respectively. Major complica-tions (perforation or delayed bleeding) occurred more often in colorectal ESD (12 vs. 6% in the esophagus and 7% in the stomach). In the upper GI tract, the majority of resected le-sions were intramucosal adenocarcinoma (59% in the esoph-agus; 47% in the stomach), while in the colorectum the ma-jority were adenomas (59%). Conclusion: ESD seems to be performed by a large number of centers and endoscopists. Our results suggest that ESD is being successfully imple-mented in Western countries, achieving a good rate of effi-cacy and safety according to European guidelines.
id RCAP_1ff1f1c1f883efad6d31d11489300fe4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2341-45452020000100001
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International SurveyEndoscopic submucosal dissectionSurveyGastrointestinal superficial lesionsBackground and Study Aim: Superficial gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms can be treated with endoscopic mucosal resec-tion (EMR) and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). These techniques are widely used in Eastern countries; how-ever, its use in the West is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current implementation of ESD in Western countries. Methods: Western endoscopists (n = 279) who published papers related to EMR/ESD between 2005 and 2017 were asked to complete an online survey from Decem-ber 2017 to February 2018. Results: A total of 58 endosco-pists (21%) completed the survey. Thirty performed ESD in the esophagus (52%), 45 in the stomach (78%), 36 in the co­ lorectum (62%), and 6 in the duodenum (10%). The median total number of lesions ever treated per endoscopist was 190, with a median number per endoscopist in 2016 of 41 (7 [IQR 1-21], 6 [IQR 4-16], and 28 [5-63] in the esophagus, in the stomach, and in the colon and rectum, respectively). En bloc resection rates were 97% in the esophagus, 95% in the stomach, and 84% in the colorectum. Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 88, 91, and 81%, respectively. Curative rates were 69, 70, and 67%, respectively. Major complica-tions (perforation or delayed bleeding) occurred more often in colorectal ESD (12 vs. 6% in the esophagus and 7% in the stomach). In the upper GI tract, the majority of resected le-sions were intramucosal adenocarcinoma (59% in the esoph-agus; 47% in the stomach), while in the colorectum the ma-jority were adenomas (59%). Conclusion: ESD seems to be performed by a large number of centers and endoscopists. Our results suggest that ESD is being successfully imple-mented in Western countries, achieving a good rate of effi-cacy and safety according to European guidelines.Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia2020-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452020000100001GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology v.27 n.1 2020reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452020000100001Araújo-Martins,MiguelPimentel-Nunes,PedroLibânio,DiogoBorges-Canha,MartaDinis-Ribeiro,Márioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:34:01Zoai:scielo:S2341-45452020000100001Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:20:59.879118Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International Survey
title How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International Survey
spellingShingle How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International Survey
Araújo-Martins,Miguel
Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Survey
Gastrointestinal superficial lesions
title_short How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International Survey
title_full How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International Survey
title_fullStr How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International Survey
title_full_unstemmed How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International Survey
title_sort How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented?: Results from an International Survey
author Araújo-Martins,Miguel
author_facet Araújo-Martins,Miguel
Pimentel-Nunes,Pedro
Libânio,Diogo
Borges-Canha,Marta
Dinis-Ribeiro,Mário
author_role author
author2 Pimentel-Nunes,Pedro
Libânio,Diogo
Borges-Canha,Marta
Dinis-Ribeiro,Mário
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araújo-Martins,Miguel
Pimentel-Nunes,Pedro
Libânio,Diogo
Borges-Canha,Marta
Dinis-Ribeiro,Mário
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Survey
Gastrointestinal superficial lesions
topic Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Survey
Gastrointestinal superficial lesions
description Background and Study Aim: Superficial gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms can be treated with endoscopic mucosal resec-tion (EMR) and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). These techniques are widely used in Eastern countries; how-ever, its use in the West is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current implementation of ESD in Western countries. Methods: Western endoscopists (n = 279) who published papers related to EMR/ESD between 2005 and 2017 were asked to complete an online survey from Decem-ber 2017 to February 2018. Results: A total of 58 endosco-pists (21%) completed the survey. Thirty performed ESD in the esophagus (52%), 45 in the stomach (78%), 36 in the co­ lorectum (62%), and 6 in the duodenum (10%). The median total number of lesions ever treated per endoscopist was 190, with a median number per endoscopist in 2016 of 41 (7 [IQR 1-21], 6 [IQR 4-16], and 28 [5-63] in the esophagus, in the stomach, and in the colon and rectum, respectively). En bloc resection rates were 97% in the esophagus, 95% in the stomach, and 84% in the colorectum. Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 88, 91, and 81%, respectively. Curative rates were 69, 70, and 67%, respectively. Major complica-tions (perforation or delayed bleeding) occurred more often in colorectal ESD (12 vs. 6% in the esophagus and 7% in the stomach). In the upper GI tract, the majority of resected le-sions were intramucosal adenocarcinoma (59% in the esoph-agus; 47% in the stomach), while in the colorectum the ma-jority were adenomas (59%). Conclusion: ESD seems to be performed by a large number of centers and endoscopists. Our results suggest that ESD is being successfully imple-mented in Western countries, achieving a good rate of effi-cacy and safety according to European guidelines.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452020000100001
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452020000100001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452020000100001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology v.27 n.1 2020
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593685473755136