Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repair

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Melo,Ryan Gouveia e
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Campos,Jorge, Garrido,Pedro, Lopes,Alice, Fernandes,Ruy Fernandes e, Silvestre,Luís, Sobrinho,Gonçalo, Ministro,Augusto, Amorim,Pedro, Moutinho,Mariana, Martins,Carlos, Nobre,Ângelo, Fernandes,José Fernandes e, Pedro,Luís Mendes
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2020000400275
Summary: Abstract Introduction/Objectives: Repair of post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAA) is a complex challenge. Choosing the correct approach to manage these aneurysms is not straightforward as both open and endovascular strategies are valid. Our aim was to analyze and compare the results of PD-TAAA treated by endovascular or open surgery. Methods: A seven-year (January-2013 and May-2020) single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with PD-TAAA treated by endovascular (group-1) or open (group-2) surgery was conducted. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were organ lesion, in-hospital infections, length of stay (LOS), endoleaks, branch occlusions, re-interventions and mortality during follow-up. Results: Twenty-one patients (15-men) were treated: 8 in group-1 and 13 in group-2. The mean age was lower in group-2 [68 (SD:11) versus 48 (SD:12), p=0.004]. Three patients had connective tissue disease (CTD). Group-1 patients had a higher ASA score (p<0.001). In group-1, debranching and TEVAR were performed in 2 patients and custom-made fenestrated/branched-endografts were used in 6. In group-2, there was one thoracic aorta interposition graft and reconstruction involving the visceral arteries ocurred in 12 patients. Seven cases were operated using the Crawford technique with visceral patch, and branched grafts were used in 3 patients with CTD. Intercostal arteries were revascularized in 5 patients. In-hospital mortality was 12% (1 patient) in group-1 and 15% (2 patients) in group-2, LogRank=0.9. The LOS was longer in group-2 (p=0.033), and there was a tendency for a longer stay in intensive care unit in this group. No difference was observed in spinal cord ischemia, acute kidney injury or re-interventions. There were more post-operative infections in group-2 (12% versus 69%, p = 0.017). During follow-up [median 15 months (IQR:55)], there was no mortality after discharge. In group-1, 14% had type-II-endoleaks, without aneurysmal sac dilation. Branch permeability during follow-up was 100% in group-1 and 95% in group-2, LogRank=0.3. Conclusion: Endovascular and open surgery of PD-TAAA allowed treatment of a wide variety of patients in this cohort. Patients treated by the endovascular surgery were older and had higher surgical risk but without repercussions on the outcomes. Open surgery was associated with longer hospital stay and more postoperative complications.
id RCAP_1ce806b706ad582d16c6e21e5052b947
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1646-706X2020000400275
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repairPost-dissection aneurysmsaortic dissectionThoraco-abdominal aneurysmsAbstract Introduction/Objectives: Repair of post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAA) is a complex challenge. Choosing the correct approach to manage these aneurysms is not straightforward as both open and endovascular strategies are valid. Our aim was to analyze and compare the results of PD-TAAA treated by endovascular or open surgery. Methods: A seven-year (January-2013 and May-2020) single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with PD-TAAA treated by endovascular (group-1) or open (group-2) surgery was conducted. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were organ lesion, in-hospital infections, length of stay (LOS), endoleaks, branch occlusions, re-interventions and mortality during follow-up. Results: Twenty-one patients (15-men) were treated: 8 in group-1 and 13 in group-2. The mean age was lower in group-2 [68 (SD:11) versus 48 (SD:12), p=0.004]. Three patients had connective tissue disease (CTD). Group-1 patients had a higher ASA score (p<0.001). In group-1, debranching and TEVAR were performed in 2 patients and custom-made fenestrated/branched-endografts were used in 6. In group-2, there was one thoracic aorta interposition graft and reconstruction involving the visceral arteries ocurred in 12 patients. Seven cases were operated using the Crawford technique with visceral patch, and branched grafts were used in 3 patients with CTD. Intercostal arteries were revascularized in 5 patients. In-hospital mortality was 12% (1 patient) in group-1 and 15% (2 patients) in group-2, LogRank=0.9. The LOS was longer in group-2 (p=0.033), and there was a tendency for a longer stay in intensive care unit in this group. No difference was observed in spinal cord ischemia, acute kidney injury or re-interventions. There were more post-operative infections in group-2 (12% versus 69%, p = 0.017). During follow-up [median 15 months (IQR:55)], there was no mortality after discharge. In group-1, 14% had type-II-endoleaks, without aneurysmal sac dilation. Branch permeability during follow-up was 100% in group-1 and 95% in group-2, LogRank=0.3. Conclusion: Endovascular and open surgery of PD-TAAA allowed treatment of a wide variety of patients in this cohort. Patients treated by the endovascular surgery were older and had higher surgical risk but without repercussions on the outcomes. Open surgery was associated with longer hospital stay and more postoperative complications.Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2020000400275Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.16 n.4 2020reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2020000400275Melo,Ryan Gouveia eCampos,JorgeGarrido,PedroLopes,AliceFernandes,Ruy Fernandes eSilvestre,LuísSobrinho,GonçaloMinistro,AugustoAmorim,PedroMoutinho,MarianaMartins,CarlosNobre,ÂngeloFernandes,José Fernandes ePedro,Luís Mendesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:22:59Zoai:scielo:S1646-706X2020000400275Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:10:22.284468Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repair
title Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repair
spellingShingle Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repair
Melo,Ryan Gouveia e
Post-dissection aneurysms
aortic dissection
Thoraco-abdominal aneurysms
title_short Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repair
title_full Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repair
title_fullStr Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repair
title_full_unstemmed Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repair
title_sort Post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms: Results of open and endovascular repair
author Melo,Ryan Gouveia e
author_facet Melo,Ryan Gouveia e
Campos,Jorge
Garrido,Pedro
Lopes,Alice
Fernandes,Ruy Fernandes e
Silvestre,Luís
Sobrinho,Gonçalo
Ministro,Augusto
Amorim,Pedro
Moutinho,Mariana
Martins,Carlos
Nobre,Ângelo
Fernandes,José Fernandes e
Pedro,Luís Mendes
author_role author
author2 Campos,Jorge
Garrido,Pedro
Lopes,Alice
Fernandes,Ruy Fernandes e
Silvestre,Luís
Sobrinho,Gonçalo
Ministro,Augusto
Amorim,Pedro
Moutinho,Mariana
Martins,Carlos
Nobre,Ângelo
Fernandes,José Fernandes e
Pedro,Luís Mendes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo,Ryan Gouveia e
Campos,Jorge
Garrido,Pedro
Lopes,Alice
Fernandes,Ruy Fernandes e
Silvestre,Luís
Sobrinho,Gonçalo
Ministro,Augusto
Amorim,Pedro
Moutinho,Mariana
Martins,Carlos
Nobre,Ângelo
Fernandes,José Fernandes e
Pedro,Luís Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Post-dissection aneurysms
aortic dissection
Thoraco-abdominal aneurysms
topic Post-dissection aneurysms
aortic dissection
Thoraco-abdominal aneurysms
description Abstract Introduction/Objectives: Repair of post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAA) is a complex challenge. Choosing the correct approach to manage these aneurysms is not straightforward as both open and endovascular strategies are valid. Our aim was to analyze and compare the results of PD-TAAA treated by endovascular or open surgery. Methods: A seven-year (January-2013 and May-2020) single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with PD-TAAA treated by endovascular (group-1) or open (group-2) surgery was conducted. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were organ lesion, in-hospital infections, length of stay (LOS), endoleaks, branch occlusions, re-interventions and mortality during follow-up. Results: Twenty-one patients (15-men) were treated: 8 in group-1 and 13 in group-2. The mean age was lower in group-2 [68 (SD:11) versus 48 (SD:12), p=0.004]. Three patients had connective tissue disease (CTD). Group-1 patients had a higher ASA score (p<0.001). In group-1, debranching and TEVAR were performed in 2 patients and custom-made fenestrated/branched-endografts were used in 6. In group-2, there was one thoracic aorta interposition graft and reconstruction involving the visceral arteries ocurred in 12 patients. Seven cases were operated using the Crawford technique with visceral patch, and branched grafts were used in 3 patients with CTD. Intercostal arteries were revascularized in 5 patients. In-hospital mortality was 12% (1 patient) in group-1 and 15% (2 patients) in group-2, LogRank=0.9. The LOS was longer in group-2 (p=0.033), and there was a tendency for a longer stay in intensive care unit in this group. No difference was observed in spinal cord ischemia, acute kidney injury or re-interventions. There were more post-operative infections in group-2 (12% versus 69%, p = 0.017). During follow-up [median 15 months (IQR:55)], there was no mortality after discharge. In group-1, 14% had type-II-endoleaks, without aneurysmal sac dilation. Branch permeability during follow-up was 100% in group-1 and 95% in group-2, LogRank=0.3. Conclusion: Endovascular and open surgery of PD-TAAA allowed treatment of a wide variety of patients in this cohort. Patients treated by the endovascular surgery were older and had higher surgical risk but without repercussions on the outcomes. Open surgery was associated with longer hospital stay and more postoperative complications.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2020000400275
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2020000400275
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-706X2020000400275
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular v.16 n.4 2020
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593502900944896