Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2025 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074 |
Summary: | Introduction: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was designed for nodal staging in cN+ breast cancer (BC) patients submitted to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A recent study questioned the need to mark suspicious nodes pre-NAT. Methods: cT1-4 N1-2 BC patients scheduled for NAT were selected for retrospective appraisal. Patients were divided according with SLNB/TAD and ycN0/ycN+ status. Detection rate (DR), concordance rate (CR), predictive factors of successful clipped-node biopsy (CNB), sentinel node (SN) pathological complete response (pCR) and of additional non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) involvement were assessed. Oncological outcomes were evaluated. Results: The study included 85 consecutive patients. DR was 83.6%, 98.8% and 98.8% for CNB, SLNB and TAD, respectively. CNB did not drive management changes as every CN was sentinel (CR 100.0%). CNB was unsuccessful in 10 patients with 2 (20.0%) re-operated with no additional benefit. Removal of at least 3 SN was associated with successful CNB (p=0.001). Fewer (1 vs 2) suspicious nodes at diagnostic echography and triple-negative or HER2 biological subtype were predictive of SN pCR. Lymph-vascular invasion was predictive of additional NSLN involvement in pSN+ patients (p=0.008). Disease-free survival was worse in ypSN+ (p=0.029) and the only regional recurrence was in an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) patient. There was no difference in the overall survival between ALND and no-ALND patients (p=0.270). Conclusion: CNB is superfluous if 3 or more SN are retrieved using a dual mapping technique. It is safe to omit ALND if pCR of the SN is achieved. Future studies should assess the need for ALND in ypSN+ patients. |
id |
RCAP_1bccc1e6e30c9bfe2999c9a89f0dc9a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revista.spcir.com:article/1074 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela ou Dissecção Axilar Orientada em Doentes com Cancro da Mama com Gânglios Positivos Submetidas a Terapêutica Neoadjuvante?Breast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionLymph Nodes/surgeryLymphatic MetastasisNeoadjuvant TherapySentinel Lymph Node/surgerySentinel Lymph Node BiopsyBiópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela Excisão do Gânglio LinfáticoGânglio Linfático Sentinela/cirurgiaGânglios Linfáticos/cirurgiaMetástases LinfáticasNeoplasias da MamaTratamento NeoadjuvanteIntroduction: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was designed for nodal staging in cN+ breast cancer (BC) patients submitted to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A recent study questioned the need to mark suspicious nodes pre-NAT. Methods: cT1-4 N1-2 BC patients scheduled for NAT were selected for retrospective appraisal. Patients were divided according with SLNB/TAD and ycN0/ycN+ status. Detection rate (DR), concordance rate (CR), predictive factors of successful clipped-node biopsy (CNB), sentinel node (SN) pathological complete response (pCR) and of additional non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) involvement were assessed. Oncological outcomes were evaluated. Results: The study included 85 consecutive patients. DR was 83.6%, 98.8% and 98.8% for CNB, SLNB and TAD, respectively. CNB did not drive management changes as every CN was sentinel (CR 100.0%). CNB was unsuccessful in 10 patients with 2 (20.0%) re-operated with no additional benefit. Removal of at least 3 SN was associated with successful CNB (p=0.001). Fewer (1 vs 2) suspicious nodes at diagnostic echography and triple-negative or HER2 biological subtype were predictive of SN pCR. Lymph-vascular invasion was predictive of additional NSLN involvement in pSN+ patients (p=0.008). Disease-free survival was worse in ypSN+ (p=0.029) and the only regional recurrence was in an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) patient. There was no difference in the overall survival between ALND and no-ALND patients (p=0.270). Conclusion: CNB is superfluous if 3 or more SN are retrieved using a dual mapping technique. It is safe to omit ALND if pCR of the SN is achieved. Future studies should assess the need for ALND in ypSN+ patients.Introdução: A disseção axilar orientada (DAO) foi desenvolvida para o estadiamento ganglionar de doentes com cancro de mama com gânglios positivos ao diagnóstico submetidas a terapia neoadjuvante (TNA). Um estudo recente questionou a necessidade de marcar os gânglios suspeitos pré-TNA. Métodos: Doentes com cancro de mama cT1-4 cN1-2 orientadas para TNA foram selecionadas para análise retrospetiva. As doentes foram divididas de acordo com o tipo de cirurgia axilar (biópsia de gânglio sentinela, BGS, vs DAO) e estado pós-TNA (ycN0 versus ycN+). A taxa de deteção (TD), concordância, fatores preditivos de biópsia de gânglio clipado, BGC, com sucesso, fatores preditivos de resposta patológica completa nos gânglios sentinela, GS, e fatores preditivos de metástases adicionais em gânglios não sentinela, GNS, foram pesquisados. Também avaliamos os outcomes oncológicos. Resultados: O estudo incluiu 85 doentes consecutivas. A TD foi de 83,6%, 98,8% e 98,8% para BGC, BGS e DAO, respectivamente. A BGC não motivou alterações no tratamento, uma vez que todos os gânglios clipados eram GS (concordância 100,0%). A BGC não foi bem sucedida em 10 doentes sendo que 2 (20,0%) foram re-operadas sem benefício adicional. A remoção de pelo menos 3 GS foi associada a BGC bem sucedida (p=0,001). Menos (1 vs 2) gânglios suspeitos à ecografia diagnóstica e tipo biológico triplo negativo ou enriquecido em HER2 foram preditivos de resposta patológica completa nos GS. A presença de invasão linfovascular foi preditiva de envolvimento adicional de GNS (p=0,008). A sobrevida livre de doença foi menor em doentes ypGS+ (p=0,029) e a única recorrência regional foi numa doente que realizou esvaziamento ganglionar axilar. Não houve diferença na sobrevida geral entre doentes submetidas versus doentes não submetidas a esvaziamento ganglionar axilar (p=0,270). Conclusão: A BGC é supérflua se pelo menos 3 GS forem obtidos utilizando uma técnica de mapeamento dupla. É seguro omitir o esvaziamento ganglionar axilar se for obtida uma resposta patológica completa nos GS. Estudos futuros devem avaliar a necessidade de esvaziamento ganglionar axilar em doentes ypGS+.Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia2025-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074Portuguese Journal of Surgery; Vol. 58 No. 1 (2025): Jan./Mar.; 47-62Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; Vol. 58 N.º 1 (2025): Jan./Mar.; 47-622183-11651646-6918reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/1074https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/1074/738Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Journal of Surgeryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSousa, NunoPinto, CatarinaPeleteiro, BarbaraFougo, José2025-04-10T16:45:22Zoai:revista.spcir.com:article/1074Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:46:29.592973Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy? Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela ou Dissecção Axilar Orientada em Doentes com Cancro da Mama com Gânglios Positivos Submetidas a Terapêutica Neoadjuvante? |
title |
Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy? |
spellingShingle |
Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy? Sousa, Nuno Breast Neoplasms Lymph Node Excision Lymph Nodes/surgery Lymphatic Metastasis Neoadjuvant Therapy Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela Excisão do Gânglio Linfático Gânglio Linfático Sentinela/cirurgia Gânglios Linfáticos/cirurgia Metástases Linfáticas Neoplasias da Mama Tratamento Neoadjuvante |
title_short |
Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy? |
title_full |
Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy? |
title_fullStr |
Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy? |
title_sort |
Sentinel Lymph‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy? |
author |
Sousa, Nuno |
author_facet |
Sousa, Nuno Pinto, Catarina Peleteiro, Barbara Fougo, José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinto, Catarina Peleteiro, Barbara Fougo, José |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sousa, Nuno Pinto, Catarina Peleteiro, Barbara Fougo, José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Breast Neoplasms Lymph Node Excision Lymph Nodes/surgery Lymphatic Metastasis Neoadjuvant Therapy Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela Excisão do Gânglio Linfático Gânglio Linfático Sentinela/cirurgia Gânglios Linfáticos/cirurgia Metástases Linfáticas Neoplasias da Mama Tratamento Neoadjuvante |
topic |
Breast Neoplasms Lymph Node Excision Lymph Nodes/surgery Lymphatic Metastasis Neoadjuvant Therapy Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela Excisão do Gânglio Linfático Gânglio Linfático Sentinela/cirurgia Gânglios Linfáticos/cirurgia Metástases Linfáticas Neoplasias da Mama Tratamento Neoadjuvante |
description |
Introduction: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was designed for nodal staging in cN+ breast cancer (BC) patients submitted to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A recent study questioned the need to mark suspicious nodes pre-NAT. Methods: cT1-4 N1-2 BC patients scheduled for NAT were selected for retrospective appraisal. Patients were divided according with SLNB/TAD and ycN0/ycN+ status. Detection rate (DR), concordance rate (CR), predictive factors of successful clipped-node biopsy (CNB), sentinel node (SN) pathological complete response (pCR) and of additional non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) involvement were assessed. Oncological outcomes were evaluated. Results: The study included 85 consecutive patients. DR was 83.6%, 98.8% and 98.8% for CNB, SLNB and TAD, respectively. CNB did not drive management changes as every CN was sentinel (CR 100.0%). CNB was unsuccessful in 10 patients with 2 (20.0%) re-operated with no additional benefit. Removal of at least 3 SN was associated with successful CNB (p=0.001). Fewer (1 vs 2) suspicious nodes at diagnostic echography and triple-negative or HER2 biological subtype were predictive of SN pCR. Lymph-vascular invasion was predictive of additional NSLN involvement in pSN+ patients (p=0.008). Disease-free survival was worse in ypSN+ (p=0.029) and the only regional recurrence was in an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) patient. There was no difference in the overall survival between ALND and no-ALND patients (p=0.270). Conclusion: CNB is superfluous if 3 or more SN are retrieved using a dual mapping technique. It is safe to omit ALND if pCR of the SN is achieved. Future studies should assess the need for ALND in ypSN+ patients. |
publishDate |
2025 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-01-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074 https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/1074 https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/1074/738 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Journal of Surgery info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Journal of Surgery |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Surgery; Vol. 58 No. 1 (2025): Jan./Mar.; 47-62 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; Vol. 58 N.º 1 (2025): Jan./Mar.; 47-62 2183-1165 1646-6918 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833598316981518336 |