Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sousa, Nuno
Publication Date: 2025
Other Authors: Pinto, Catarina, Peleteiro, Barbara, Fougo, José
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074
Summary: Introduction: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was designed for nodal staging in cN+ breast cancer (BC) patients submitted to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A recent study questioned the need to mark suspicious nodes pre-NAT. Methods: cT1-4 N1-2 BC patients scheduled for NAT were selected for retrospective appraisal. Patients were divided according with SLNB/TAD and ycN0/ycN+ status. Detection rate (DR), concordance rate (CR), predictive factors of successful clipped-node biopsy (CNB), sentinel node (SN) pathological complete response (pCR) and of additional non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) involvement were assessed. Oncological outcomes were evaluated. Results: The study included 85 consecutive patients. DR was 83.6%, 98.8% and 98.8% for CNB, SLNB and TAD, respectively. CNB did not drive management changes as every CN was sentinel (CR 100.0%). CNB was unsuccessful in 10 patients with 2 (20.0%) re-operated with no additional benefit. Removal of at least 3 SN was associated with successful CNB (p=0.001). Fewer (1 vs 2) suspicious nodes at diagnostic echography and triple-negative or HER2 biological subtype were predictive of SN pCR. Lymph-vascular invasion was predictive of additional NSLN involvement in pSN+ patients (p=0.008). Disease-free survival was worse in ypSN+ (p=0.029) and the only regional recurrence was in an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) patient. There was no difference in the overall survival between ALND and no-ALND patients (p=0.270). Conclusion: CNB is superfluous if 3 or more SN are retrieved using a dual mapping technique. It is safe to omit ALND if pCR of the SN is achieved. Future studies should assess the need for ALND in ypSN+ patients.
id RCAP_1bccc1e6e30c9bfe2999c9a89f0dc9a9
oai_identifier_str oai:revista.spcir.com:article/1074
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela ou Dissecção Axilar Orientada em Doentes com Cancro da Mama com Gânglios Positivos Submetidas a Terapêutica Neoadjuvante?Breast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionLymph Nodes/surgeryLymphatic MetastasisNeoadjuvant TherapySentinel Lymph Node/surgerySentinel Lymph Node BiopsyBiópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela Excisão do Gânglio LinfáticoGânglio Linfático Sentinela/cirurgiaGânglios Linfáticos/cirurgiaMetástases LinfáticasNeoplasias da MamaTratamento NeoadjuvanteIntroduction: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was designed for nodal staging in cN+ breast cancer (BC) patients submitted to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A recent study questioned the need to mark suspicious nodes pre-NAT. Methods: cT1-4 N1-2 BC patients scheduled for NAT were selected for retrospective appraisal. Patients were divided according with SLNB/TAD and ycN0/ycN+ status. Detection rate (DR), concordance rate (CR), predictive factors of successful clipped-node biopsy (CNB), sentinel node (SN) pathological complete response (pCR) and of additional non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) involvement were assessed. Oncological outcomes were evaluated. Results: The study included 85 consecutive patients. DR was 83.6%, 98.8% and 98.8% for CNB, SLNB and TAD, respectively. CNB did not drive management changes as every CN was sentinel (CR 100.0%). CNB was unsuccessful in 10 patients with 2 (20.0%) re-operated with no additional benefit. Removal of at least 3 SN was associated with successful CNB (p=0.001). Fewer (1 vs 2) suspicious nodes at diagnostic echography and triple-negative or HER2 biological subtype were predictive of SN pCR. Lymph-vascular invasion was predictive of additional NSLN involvement in pSN+ patients (p=0.008). Disease-free survival was worse in ypSN+ (p=0.029) and the only regional recurrence was in an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) patient. There was no difference in the overall survival between ALND and no-ALND patients (p=0.270). Conclusion: CNB is superfluous if 3 or more SN are retrieved using a dual mapping technique. It is safe to omit ALND if pCR of the SN is achieved. Future studies should assess the need for ALND in ypSN+ patients.Introdução: A disseção axilar orientada (DAO) foi desenvolvida para o estadiamento ganglionar de doentes com cancro de mama com gânglios positivos ao diagnóstico submetidas a terapia neoadjuvante (TNA). Um estudo recente questionou a necessidade de marcar os gânglios suspeitos pré-TNA. Métodos: Doentes com cancro de mama cT1-4 cN1-2 orientadas para TNA foram selecionadas para análise retrospetiva. As doentes foram divididas de acordo com o tipo de cirurgia axilar (biópsia de gânglio sentinela, BGS, vs DAO) e estado pós-TNA (ycN0 versus ycN+). A taxa de deteção (TD), concordância, fatores preditivos de biópsia de gânglio clipado, BGC, com sucesso, fatores preditivos de resposta patológica completa nos gânglios sentinela, GS, e fatores preditivos de metástases adicionais em gânglios não sentinela, GNS, foram pesquisados. Também avaliamos os outcomes oncológicos. Resultados: O estudo incluiu 85 doentes consecutivas. A TD foi de 83,6%, 98,8% e 98,8% para BGC, BGS e DAO, respectivamente. A BGC não motivou alterações no tratamento, uma vez que todos os gânglios clipados eram GS (concordância 100,0%). A BGC não foi bem sucedida em 10 doentes sendo que 2 (20,0%) foram re-operadas sem benefício adicional. A remoção de pelo menos 3 GS foi associada a BGC bem sucedida (p=0,001). Menos (1 vs 2) gânglios suspeitos à ecografia diagnóstica e tipo biológico triplo negativo ou enriquecido em HER2 foram preditivos de resposta patológica completa nos GS. A presença de invasão linfovascular foi preditiva de envolvimento adicional de GNS (p=0,008). A sobrevida livre de doença foi menor em doentes ypGS+ (p=0,029) e a única recorrência regional foi numa doente que realizou esvaziamento ganglionar axilar. Não houve diferença na sobrevida geral entre doentes submetidas versus doentes não submetidas a esvaziamento ganglionar axilar (p=0,270). Conclusão: A BGC é supérflua se pelo menos 3 GS forem obtidos utilizando uma técnica de mapeamento dupla. É seguro omitir o esvaziamento ganglionar axilar se for obtida uma resposta patológica completa nos GS. Estudos futuros devem avaliar a necessidade de esvaziamento ganglionar axilar em doentes ypGS+.Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia2025-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074Portuguese Journal of Surgery; Vol. 58 No. 1 (2025): Jan./Mar.; 47-62Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; Vol. 58 N.º 1 (2025): Jan./Mar.; 47-622183-11651646-6918reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/1074https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/1074/738Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Journal of Surgeryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSousa, NunoPinto, CatarinaPeleteiro, BarbaraFougo, José2025-04-10T16:45:22Zoai:revista.spcir.com:article/1074Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:46:29.592973Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?
Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela ou Dissecção Axilar Orientada em Doentes com Cancro da Mama com Gânglios Positivos Submetidas a Terapêutica Neoadjuvante?
title Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?
spellingShingle Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?
Sousa, Nuno
Breast Neoplasms
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes/surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela Excisão do Gânglio Linfático
Gânglio Linfático Sentinela/cirurgia
Gânglios Linfáticos/cirurgia
Metástases Linfáticas
Neoplasias da Mama
Tratamento Neoadjuvante
title_short Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?
title_full Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?
title_fullStr Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?
title_full_unstemmed Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?
title_sort Sentinel Lymph­‑Node Biopsy or Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node­‑Positive Breast Cancer Patients Submitted to Neoadjuvant Therapy?
author Sousa, Nuno
author_facet Sousa, Nuno
Pinto, Catarina
Peleteiro, Barbara
Fougo, José
author_role author
author2 Pinto, Catarina
Peleteiro, Barbara
Fougo, José
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa, Nuno
Pinto, Catarina
Peleteiro, Barbara
Fougo, José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Breast Neoplasms
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes/surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela Excisão do Gânglio Linfático
Gânglio Linfático Sentinela/cirurgia
Gânglios Linfáticos/cirurgia
Metástases Linfáticas
Neoplasias da Mama
Tratamento Neoadjuvante
topic Breast Neoplasms
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes/surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Biópsia do Gânglio Linfático Sentinela Excisão do Gânglio Linfático
Gânglio Linfático Sentinela/cirurgia
Gânglios Linfáticos/cirurgia
Metástases Linfáticas
Neoplasias da Mama
Tratamento Neoadjuvante
description Introduction: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was designed for nodal staging in cN+ breast cancer (BC) patients submitted to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A recent study questioned the need to mark suspicious nodes pre-NAT. Methods: cT1-4 N1-2 BC patients scheduled for NAT were selected for retrospective appraisal. Patients were divided according with SLNB/TAD and ycN0/ycN+ status. Detection rate (DR), concordance rate (CR), predictive factors of successful clipped-node biopsy (CNB), sentinel node (SN) pathological complete response (pCR) and of additional non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) involvement were assessed. Oncological outcomes were evaluated. Results: The study included 85 consecutive patients. DR was 83.6%, 98.8% and 98.8% for CNB, SLNB and TAD, respectively. CNB did not drive management changes as every CN was sentinel (CR 100.0%). CNB was unsuccessful in 10 patients with 2 (20.0%) re-operated with no additional benefit. Removal of at least 3 SN was associated with successful CNB (p=0.001). Fewer (1 vs 2) suspicious nodes at diagnostic echography and triple-negative or HER2 biological subtype were predictive of SN pCR. Lymph-vascular invasion was predictive of additional NSLN involvement in pSN+ patients (p=0.008). Disease-free survival was worse in ypSN+ (p=0.029) and the only regional recurrence was in an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) patient. There was no difference in the overall survival between ALND and no-ALND patients (p=0.270). Conclusion: CNB is superfluous if 3 or more SN are retrieved using a dual mapping technique. It is safe to omit ALND if pCR of the SN is achieved. Future studies should assess the need for ALND in ypSN+ patients.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074
https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074
url https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1074
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/1074
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/1074/738
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Journal of Surgery
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Journal of Surgery
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Surgery; Vol. 58 No. 1 (2025): Jan./Mar.; 47-62
Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; Vol. 58 N.º 1 (2025): Jan./Mar.; 47-62
2183-1165
1646-6918
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833598316981518336