Export Ready — 

Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodrigues, A. C.
Publication Date: 2001
Other Authors: Brito, A. G., Melo, L. F.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/1658
Summary: This study concerns the application of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for the posttreatment of an effluent rejected by an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor operating in a brewery. The goal was to achieve the required wastewater quality for discharge to surface water. The primary target was the removal of nitrogen compounds, but chemical oxygen demand and suspended solids were also concerns. Phosphorus concentration and protozoan population were also monitored during SBR operation. Two different strategies were tested: an operation based on an aerobic-anoxic sequence and another based on applying a predenitrification step, that is, an anoxic-aerobic-anoxic sequence. Ammonium (NH4-N) removal was achieved in all assays. Nitrification efficiency reached 97%, and the maximum observed rate was 0.175 kg NH4-N/kg volatile suspended solids.d. A denitrification process was detected during the aerated periods, despite a dissolved oxygen concentration in the bulk liquid of 2.8 to 3.7 mg O-2/L. However, denitrification was suppressed when the bulk liquid oxygen concentration was increased to 7 mg O-2/L. The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of the UASB effluent was too low and hindered the postdenitrification phase. This fact was confirmed by complete nitrate removal when an acetate supplement was added. On the other hand, the insertion of a primary anoxic phase in the reaction cycle was the best treatment strategy, leading to nitrogen values within the legal framework. The protozoan population showed significant changes in response to the aerobic-anoxic conditions. However, periodic nonaerated conditions were not detrimental to aerobic protozoa, which recovered as soon as oxygen was again available.
id RCAP_19199eafc5985282fef473eff8fcbcea
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/1658
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactorSequencing batch reactorBrewery wastewaterAnaerobic pretreatmentNitrificationDenitrificationProtozoaScience & TechnologyThis study concerns the application of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for the posttreatment of an effluent rejected by an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor operating in a brewery. The goal was to achieve the required wastewater quality for discharge to surface water. The primary target was the removal of nitrogen compounds, but chemical oxygen demand and suspended solids were also concerns. Phosphorus concentration and protozoan population were also monitored during SBR operation. Two different strategies were tested: an operation based on an aerobic-anoxic sequence and another based on applying a predenitrification step, that is, an anoxic-aerobic-anoxic sequence. Ammonium (NH4-N) removal was achieved in all assays. Nitrification efficiency reached 97%, and the maximum observed rate was 0.175 kg NH4-N/kg volatile suspended solids.d. A denitrification process was detected during the aerated periods, despite a dissolved oxygen concentration in the bulk liquid of 2.8 to 3.7 mg O-2/L. However, denitrification was suppressed when the bulk liquid oxygen concentration was increased to 7 mg O-2/L. The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of the UASB effluent was too low and hindered the postdenitrification phase. This fact was confirmed by complete nitrate removal when an acetate supplement was added. On the other hand, the insertion of a primary anoxic phase in the reaction cycle was the best treatment strategy, leading to nitrogen values within the legal framework. The protozoan population showed significant changes in response to the aerobic-anoxic conditions. However, periodic nonaerated conditions were not detrimental to aerobic protozoa, which recovered as soon as oxygen was again available.Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) - PRAXIS XXI.The Water Environment Federation (WEF)Universidade do MinhoRodrigues, A. C.Brito, A. G.Melo, L. F.2001-012001-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/1658eng"Water environmental research" ISSN 1061-4303. 73:1 (2001) 45-51.1061-430311558301info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-11T05:20:20Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/1658Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T15:15:20.512444Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor
title Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor
spellingShingle Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor
Rodrigues, A. C.
Sequencing batch reactor
Brewery wastewater
Anaerobic pretreatment
Nitrification
Denitrification
Protozoa
Science & Technology
title_short Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor
title_full Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor
title_fullStr Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor
title_full_unstemmed Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor
title_sort Post-treatment of a brewery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor
author Rodrigues, A. C.
author_facet Rodrigues, A. C.
Brito, A. G.
Melo, L. F.
author_role author
author2 Brito, A. G.
Melo, L. F.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, A. C.
Brito, A. G.
Melo, L. F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sequencing batch reactor
Brewery wastewater
Anaerobic pretreatment
Nitrification
Denitrification
Protozoa
Science & Technology
topic Sequencing batch reactor
Brewery wastewater
Anaerobic pretreatment
Nitrification
Denitrification
Protozoa
Science & Technology
description This study concerns the application of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for the posttreatment of an effluent rejected by an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor operating in a brewery. The goal was to achieve the required wastewater quality for discharge to surface water. The primary target was the removal of nitrogen compounds, but chemical oxygen demand and suspended solids were also concerns. Phosphorus concentration and protozoan population were also monitored during SBR operation. Two different strategies were tested: an operation based on an aerobic-anoxic sequence and another based on applying a predenitrification step, that is, an anoxic-aerobic-anoxic sequence. Ammonium (NH4-N) removal was achieved in all assays. Nitrification efficiency reached 97%, and the maximum observed rate was 0.175 kg NH4-N/kg volatile suspended solids.d. A denitrification process was detected during the aerated periods, despite a dissolved oxygen concentration in the bulk liquid of 2.8 to 3.7 mg O-2/L. However, denitrification was suppressed when the bulk liquid oxygen concentration was increased to 7 mg O-2/L. The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of the UASB effluent was too low and hindered the postdenitrification phase. This fact was confirmed by complete nitrate removal when an acetate supplement was added. On the other hand, the insertion of a primary anoxic phase in the reaction cycle was the best treatment strategy, leading to nitrogen values within the legal framework. The protozoan population showed significant changes in response to the aerobic-anoxic conditions. However, periodic nonaerated conditions were not detrimental to aerobic protozoa, which recovered as soon as oxygen was again available.
publishDate 2001
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2001-01
2001-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/1658
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/1658
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv "Water environmental research" ISSN 1061-4303. 73:1 (2001) 45-51.
1061-4303
11558301
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv The Water Environment Federation (WEF)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv The Water Environment Federation (WEF)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833595197202628608