Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2021 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/51057 |
Summary: | Biological invasions continue to threaten the stability of ecosystems and societies that are dependent on their services. Whilst the ecological impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) have been widely reported in recent decades, there remains a paucity of information concerning their economic impacts. Europe has strong trade and transport links with the rest of the world, facilitating hundreds of IAS incursions, and largely centralised decision-making frameworks. The present study is the first comprehensive and detailed effort that quantifies the costs of IAS collectively across European countries and examines temporal trends in these data. In addition, the distributions of costs across countries, socioeconomic sectors and taxonomic groups are examined, as are socio-economic correlates of management and damage costs. Total costs of IAS in Europe summed to US$140.20 billion (or €116.61 billion) between 1960 and 2020, with the majority (60%) being damage-related and impacting multiple sectors. Costs were also geographically widespread but dominated by impacts in large western and central European countries, i.e. the UK, Spain, France, and Germany. Human population size, land area, GDP, and tourism were significant predictors of invasion costs, with management costs additionally predicted by numbers of introduced species, research effort and trade. Temporally, invasion costs have increased exponentially through time, with up to US$23.58 billion (€19.64 billion) in 2013, and US$139.56 billion (€116.24 billion) in impacts extrapolated in 2020. Importantly, although these costs are substantial, there remain knowledge gaps on several geographic and taxonomic scales, indicating that these costs are severely underestimated. We, thus, urge increased and improved cost reporting for economic impacts of IAS and coordinated international action to prevent further spread and mitigate impacts of IAS populations |
id |
RCAP_17c264e185ff3d4e64c61e60bfce65a2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ulisboa.pt:10451/51057 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Economic costs of invasive alien species across EuropeBiodiversityEuropean UnionInvaCostMonetary impactsNon-native biotaSocio-economic correlatesSocioeconomic sectorsBiological invasions continue to threaten the stability of ecosystems and societies that are dependent on their services. Whilst the ecological impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) have been widely reported in recent decades, there remains a paucity of information concerning their economic impacts. Europe has strong trade and transport links with the rest of the world, facilitating hundreds of IAS incursions, and largely centralised decision-making frameworks. The present study is the first comprehensive and detailed effort that quantifies the costs of IAS collectively across European countries and examines temporal trends in these data. In addition, the distributions of costs across countries, socioeconomic sectors and taxonomic groups are examined, as are socio-economic correlates of management and damage costs. Total costs of IAS in Europe summed to US$140.20 billion (or €116.61 billion) between 1960 and 2020, with the majority (60%) being damage-related and impacting multiple sectors. Costs were also geographically widespread but dominated by impacts in large western and central European countries, i.e. the UK, Spain, France, and Germany. Human population size, land area, GDP, and tourism were significant predictors of invasion costs, with management costs additionally predicted by numbers of introduced species, research effort and trade. Temporally, invasion costs have increased exponentially through time, with up to US$23.58 billion (€19.64 billion) in 2013, and US$139.56 billion (€116.24 billion) in impacts extrapolated in 2020. Importantly, although these costs are substantial, there remain knowledge gaps on several geographic and taxonomic scales, indicating that these costs are severely underestimated. We, thus, urge increased and improved cost reporting for economic impacts of IAS and coordinated international action to prevent further spread and mitigate impacts of IAS populationsPensoftRepositório da Universidade de LisboaHaubrock, Phillip J.Turbelin, Anna J.Cuthbert, Ross N.Novoa, AnaTaylor, Nigel G.Angulo, ElenaBallesteros-Mejia, LilianaBodey, Thomas W.Capinha, CésarDiagne, ChristopheEssl, FranzGolivets, MarinaKirichenko, NataliaKourantidou, MelinaLeroy, BorisRenault, DavidVerbrugge, LauraCourchamp, Franck2022-01-31T15:23:37Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/51057engHaubrock, P. J., Turbelin, A. J., Cuthbert, R. N., Novoa, A., Taylor, N. G., Angulo, E., Ballesteros-Mejia, L., Bodey, T. W., Capinha, C., Diagne, C., Essl, F., Golivets, M., Kirichenko, N., Kourantidou, M., Leroy, B., Renault, D., Verbrugge, L. & Courchamp, F. (2021). Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe. NeoBiota, 67, 153–190. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.581961619-003310.3897/neobiota.67.581961314-2488info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-17T14:40:47Zoai:repositorio.ulisboa.pt:10451/51057Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T03:21:26.857190Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe |
title |
Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe |
spellingShingle |
Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe Haubrock, Phillip J. Biodiversity European Union InvaCost Monetary impacts Non-native biota Socio-economic correlates Socioeconomic sectors |
title_short |
Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe |
title_full |
Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe |
title_fullStr |
Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe |
title_sort |
Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe |
author |
Haubrock, Phillip J. |
author_facet |
Haubrock, Phillip J. Turbelin, Anna J. Cuthbert, Ross N. Novoa, Ana Taylor, Nigel G. Angulo, Elena Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana Bodey, Thomas W. Capinha, César Diagne, Christophe Essl, Franz Golivets, Marina Kirichenko, Natalia Kourantidou, Melina Leroy, Boris Renault, David Verbrugge, Laura Courchamp, Franck |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Turbelin, Anna J. Cuthbert, Ross N. Novoa, Ana Taylor, Nigel G. Angulo, Elena Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana Bodey, Thomas W. Capinha, César Diagne, Christophe Essl, Franz Golivets, Marina Kirichenko, Natalia Kourantidou, Melina Leroy, Boris Renault, David Verbrugge, Laura Courchamp, Franck |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Haubrock, Phillip J. Turbelin, Anna J. Cuthbert, Ross N. Novoa, Ana Taylor, Nigel G. Angulo, Elena Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana Bodey, Thomas W. Capinha, César Diagne, Christophe Essl, Franz Golivets, Marina Kirichenko, Natalia Kourantidou, Melina Leroy, Boris Renault, David Verbrugge, Laura Courchamp, Franck |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biodiversity European Union InvaCost Monetary impacts Non-native biota Socio-economic correlates Socioeconomic sectors |
topic |
Biodiversity European Union InvaCost Monetary impacts Non-native biota Socio-economic correlates Socioeconomic sectors |
description |
Biological invasions continue to threaten the stability of ecosystems and societies that are dependent on their services. Whilst the ecological impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) have been widely reported in recent decades, there remains a paucity of information concerning their economic impacts. Europe has strong trade and transport links with the rest of the world, facilitating hundreds of IAS incursions, and largely centralised decision-making frameworks. The present study is the first comprehensive and detailed effort that quantifies the costs of IAS collectively across European countries and examines temporal trends in these data. In addition, the distributions of costs across countries, socioeconomic sectors and taxonomic groups are examined, as are socio-economic correlates of management and damage costs. Total costs of IAS in Europe summed to US$140.20 billion (or €116.61 billion) between 1960 and 2020, with the majority (60%) being damage-related and impacting multiple sectors. Costs were also geographically widespread but dominated by impacts in large western and central European countries, i.e. the UK, Spain, France, and Germany. Human population size, land area, GDP, and tourism were significant predictors of invasion costs, with management costs additionally predicted by numbers of introduced species, research effort and trade. Temporally, invasion costs have increased exponentially through time, with up to US$23.58 billion (€19.64 billion) in 2013, and US$139.56 billion (€116.24 billion) in impacts extrapolated in 2020. Importantly, although these costs are substantial, there remain knowledge gaps on several geographic and taxonomic scales, indicating that these costs are severely underestimated. We, thus, urge increased and improved cost reporting for economic impacts of IAS and coordinated international action to prevent further spread and mitigate impacts of IAS populations |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2022-01-31T15:23:37Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/51057 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/51057 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Haubrock, P. J., Turbelin, A. J., Cuthbert, R. N., Novoa, A., Taylor, N. G., Angulo, E., Ballesteros-Mejia, L., Bodey, T. W., Capinha, C., Diagne, C., Essl, F., Golivets, M., Kirichenko, N., Kourantidou, M., Leroy, B., Renault, D., Verbrugge, L. & Courchamp, F. (2021). Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe. NeoBiota, 67, 153–190. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.58196 1619-0033 10.3897/neobiota.67.58196 1314-2488 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pensoft |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pensoft |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833601673904259072 |