The Politics of Non‐Existence
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678 |
Summary: | This article argues that the representation of future generations is likely to remain inadequate because of the lack of accountability mechanisms characteristic of representative relations among contemporaries. Two problems pertaining to the representation of future generations and their interests are distinguished, namely misrepresentation and negligence. Misrepresentation refers to ill-informed, biased, and purposive interpretations regarding the interests of future generations, whereas negligence involves future interests not being properly considered in policymaking. While these two problems are often intertwined, misrepresentation is a problem of epistemic and normative judgments, whereas negligence is a motivational problem. The interests of future generations are especially likely to be neglected in cases of so-called intergenerational conflict, that is, situations of welfare tradeoffs between present and future generations. Inclusive democratic deliberation is a remedy for misrepresentation, but its capacity to address negligence may be more limited. Finally, the article remarks on the role of future-regarding deliberation in representative democratic systems. |
id |
RCAP_114eddf7f5704d72fba81cc4ee7ac26e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7678 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
The Politics of Non‐Existenceaccountability; deliberation; future generations; institutional design; intergenerational conflicts; representationThis article argues that the representation of future generations is likely to remain inadequate because of the lack of accountability mechanisms characteristic of representative relations among contemporaries. Two problems pertaining to the representation of future generations and their interests are distinguished, namely misrepresentation and negligence. Misrepresentation refers to ill-informed, biased, and purposive interpretations regarding the interests of future generations, whereas negligence involves future interests not being properly considered in policymaking. While these two problems are often intertwined, misrepresentation is a problem of epistemic and normative judgments, whereas negligence is a motivational problem. The interests of future generations are especially likely to be neglected in cases of so-called intergenerational conflict, that is, situations of welfare tradeoffs between present and future generations. Inclusive democratic deliberation is a remedy for misrepresentation, but its capacity to address negligence may be more limited. Finally, the article remarks on the role of future-regarding deliberation in representative democratic systems.Cogitatio Press2024-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678Politics and Governance; Vol 12 (2024): Considering Future Generations in Democratic Governance2183-246310.17645/pag.i379reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7678https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7678/3643Copyright (c) 2024 Maija Setäläinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSetälä, Maija2024-05-02T15:16:09Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7678Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:34:01.177624Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Politics of Non‐Existence |
title |
The Politics of Non‐Existence |
spellingShingle |
The Politics of Non‐Existence Setälä, Maija accountability; deliberation; future generations; institutional design; intergenerational conflicts; representation |
title_short |
The Politics of Non‐Existence |
title_full |
The Politics of Non‐Existence |
title_fullStr |
The Politics of Non‐Existence |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Politics of Non‐Existence |
title_sort |
The Politics of Non‐Existence |
author |
Setälä, Maija |
author_facet |
Setälä, Maija |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Setälä, Maija |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
accountability; deliberation; future generations; institutional design; intergenerational conflicts; representation |
topic |
accountability; deliberation; future generations; institutional design; intergenerational conflicts; representation |
description |
This article argues that the representation of future generations is likely to remain inadequate because of the lack of accountability mechanisms characteristic of representative relations among contemporaries. Two problems pertaining to the representation of future generations and their interests are distinguished, namely misrepresentation and negligence. Misrepresentation refers to ill-informed, biased, and purposive interpretations regarding the interests of future generations, whereas negligence involves future interests not being properly considered in policymaking. While these two problems are often intertwined, misrepresentation is a problem of epistemic and normative judgments, whereas negligence is a motivational problem. The interests of future generations are especially likely to be neglected in cases of so-called intergenerational conflict, that is, situations of welfare tradeoffs between present and future generations. Inclusive democratic deliberation is a remedy for misrepresentation, but its capacity to address negligence may be more limited. Finally, the article remarks on the role of future-regarding deliberation in representative democratic systems. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-28 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7678 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7678/3643 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Maija Setälä info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Maija Setälä |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 12 (2024): Considering Future Generations in Democratic Governance 2183-2463 10.17645/pag.i379 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833593876371210240 |