The Politics of Non‐Existence

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Setälä, Maija
Publication Date: 2024
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678
Summary: This article argues that the representation of future generations is likely to remain inadequate because of the lack of accountability mechanisms characteristic of representative relations among contemporaries. Two problems pertaining to the representation of future generations and their interests are distinguished, namely misrepresentation and negligence. Misrepresentation refers to ill-informed, biased, and purposive interpretations regarding the interests of future generations, whereas negligence involves future interests not being properly considered in policymaking. While these two problems are often intertwined, misrepresentation is a problem of epistemic and normative judgments, whereas negligence is a motivational problem. The interests of future generations are especially likely to be neglected in cases of so-called intergenerational conflict, that is, situations of welfare tradeoffs between present and future generations. Inclusive democratic deliberation is a remedy for misrepresentation, but its capacity to address negligence may be more limited. Finally, the article remarks on the role of future-regarding deliberation in representative democratic systems.
id RCAP_114eddf7f5704d72fba81cc4ee7ac26e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7678
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling The Politics of Non‐Existenceaccountability; deliberation; future generations; institutional design; intergenerational conflicts; representationThis article argues that the representation of future generations is likely to remain inadequate because of the lack of accountability mechanisms characteristic of representative relations among contemporaries. Two problems pertaining to the representation of future generations and their interests are distinguished, namely misrepresentation and negligence. Misrepresentation refers to ill-informed, biased, and purposive interpretations regarding the interests of future generations, whereas negligence involves future interests not being properly considered in policymaking. While these two problems are often intertwined, misrepresentation is a problem of epistemic and normative judgments, whereas negligence is a motivational problem. The interests of future generations are especially likely to be neglected in cases of so-called intergenerational conflict, that is, situations of welfare tradeoffs between present and future generations. Inclusive democratic deliberation is a remedy for misrepresentation, but its capacity to address negligence may be more limited. Finally, the article remarks on the role of future-regarding deliberation in representative democratic systems.Cogitatio Press2024-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678Politics and Governance; Vol 12 (2024): Considering Future Generations in Democratic Governance2183-246310.17645/pag.i379reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7678https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7678/3643Copyright (c) 2024 Maija Setäläinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSetälä, Maija2024-05-02T15:16:09Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7678Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:34:01.177624Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Politics of Non‐Existence
title The Politics of Non‐Existence
spellingShingle The Politics of Non‐Existence
Setälä, Maija
accountability; deliberation; future generations; institutional design; intergenerational conflicts; representation
title_short The Politics of Non‐Existence
title_full The Politics of Non‐Existence
title_fullStr The Politics of Non‐Existence
title_full_unstemmed The Politics of Non‐Existence
title_sort The Politics of Non‐Existence
author Setälä, Maija
author_facet Setälä, Maija
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Setälä, Maija
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv accountability; deliberation; future generations; institutional design; intergenerational conflicts; representation
topic accountability; deliberation; future generations; institutional design; intergenerational conflicts; representation
description This article argues that the representation of future generations is likely to remain inadequate because of the lack of accountability mechanisms characteristic of representative relations among contemporaries. Two problems pertaining to the representation of future generations and their interests are distinguished, namely misrepresentation and negligence. Misrepresentation refers to ill-informed, biased, and purposive interpretations regarding the interests of future generations, whereas negligence involves future interests not being properly considered in policymaking. While these two problems are often intertwined, misrepresentation is a problem of epistemic and normative judgments, whereas negligence is a motivational problem. The interests of future generations are especially likely to be neglected in cases of so-called intergenerational conflict, that is, situations of welfare tradeoffs between present and future generations. Inclusive democratic deliberation is a remedy for misrepresentation, but its capacity to address negligence may be more limited. Finally, the article remarks on the role of future-regarding deliberation in representative democratic systems.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7678
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7678
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7678/3643
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Maija Setälä
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Maija Setälä
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 12 (2024): Considering Future Generations in Democratic Governance
2183-2463
10.17645/pag.i379
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593876371210240