Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468 |
Resumo: | While European elections are often seen as remote from EU issues, considerations specifically linked to the EU came to the forefront in the wake of the 2014 European elections: the economic and financial crisis, the new process of designation of the European Commission President, and the alleged increase of Eurosceptic votes. This increased salience of political debates about the EU asks for a reconsideration of the ‘second-order nature’ of European elections. In this context, as in 2009, the Belgian electorate voted for the regional and European levels on the very same day. Belgian voters were thus offered the opportunity to split their ticket between both levels. This allows comparing the occurrence and determinants of these ‘immediate switching’ behaviours in 2014 with those of the presumably less politicized EP elections in 2009. We do that by employing the 2009 and 2014 PartiRep Election Study data. On the one hand, the article shows that split-ticket voting cannot be explained by economic voting, European identity, and attitudes towards integration in 2014. On the other hand, the unique configuration of the Belgian elections enables us to observe that the introduction of Spitzenkandidaten did enhance split-ticket voting for voters who could directly vote for this candidate (in Flanders), while this did not increase split-ticket voting among voters who could only indirectly support the candidate (in Wallonia). |
id |
RCAP_1144f32ed48109f5be0da7eec7f5bbe5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014economic voting; European elections; politicization; split-ticket votingWhile European elections are often seen as remote from EU issues, considerations specifically linked to the EU came to the forefront in the wake of the 2014 European elections: the economic and financial crisis, the new process of designation of the European Commission President, and the alleged increase of Eurosceptic votes. This increased salience of political debates about the EU asks for a reconsideration of the ‘second-order nature’ of European elections. In this context, as in 2009, the Belgian electorate voted for the regional and European levels on the very same day. Belgian voters were thus offered the opportunity to split their ticket between both levels. This allows comparing the occurrence and determinants of these ‘immediate switching’ behaviours in 2014 with those of the presumably less politicized EP elections in 2009. We do that by employing the 2009 and 2014 PartiRep Election Study data. On the one hand, the article shows that split-ticket voting cannot be explained by economic voting, European identity, and attitudes towards integration in 2014. On the other hand, the unique configuration of the Belgian elections enables us to observe that the introduction of Spitzenkandidaten did enhance split-ticket voting for voters who could directly vote for this candidate (in Flanders), while this did not increase split-ticket voting among voters who could only indirectly support the candidate (in Wallonia).Cogitatio2016-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 116-1292183-2463reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/468https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/468/468Copyright (c) 2016 Camille Kelbel, Virginie Van Ingelgom, Soetkin Verhaegeninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKelbel, CamilleVan Ingelgom, VirginieVerhaegen, Soetkin2022-10-21T16:03:50Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:34:02.410104Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014 |
title |
Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014 |
spellingShingle |
Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014 Kelbel, Camille economic voting; European elections; politicization; split-ticket voting |
title_short |
Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014 |
title_full |
Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014 |
title_fullStr |
Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014 |
title_sort |
Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014 |
author |
Kelbel, Camille |
author_facet |
Kelbel, Camille Van Ingelgom, Virginie Verhaegen, Soetkin |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Van Ingelgom, Virginie Verhaegen, Soetkin |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kelbel, Camille Van Ingelgom, Virginie Verhaegen, Soetkin |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
economic voting; European elections; politicization; split-ticket voting |
topic |
economic voting; European elections; politicization; split-ticket voting |
description |
While European elections are often seen as remote from EU issues, considerations specifically linked to the EU came to the forefront in the wake of the 2014 European elections: the economic and financial crisis, the new process of designation of the European Commission President, and the alleged increase of Eurosceptic votes. This increased salience of political debates about the EU asks for a reconsideration of the ‘second-order nature’ of European elections. In this context, as in 2009, the Belgian electorate voted for the regional and European levels on the very same day. Belgian voters were thus offered the opportunity to split their ticket between both levels. This allows comparing the occurrence and determinants of these ‘immediate switching’ behaviours in 2014 with those of the presumably less politicized EP elections in 2009. We do that by employing the 2009 and 2014 PartiRep Election Study data. On the one hand, the article shows that split-ticket voting cannot be explained by economic voting, European identity, and attitudes towards integration in 2014. On the other hand, the unique configuration of the Belgian elections enables us to observe that the introduction of Spitzenkandidaten did enhance split-ticket voting for voters who could directly vote for this candidate (in Flanders), while this did not increase split-ticket voting among voters who could only indirectly support the candidate (in Wallonia). |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/468 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/468/468 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Camille Kelbel, Virginie Van Ingelgom, Soetkin Verhaegen info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Camille Kelbel, Virginie Van Ingelgom, Soetkin Verhaegen |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 116-129 2183-2463 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833590994286673920 |