Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kelbel, Camille
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Van Ingelgom, Virginie, Verhaegen, Soetkin
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468
Summary: While European elections are often seen as remote from EU issues, considerations specifically linked to the EU came to the forefront in the wake of the 2014 European elections: the economic and financial crisis, the new process of designation of the European Commission President, and the alleged increase of Eurosceptic votes. This increased salience of political debates about the EU asks for a reconsideration of the ‘second-order nature’ of European elections. In this context, as in 2009, the Belgian electorate voted for the regional and European levels on the very same day. Belgian voters were thus offered the opportunity to split their ticket between both levels. This allows comparing the occurrence and determinants of these ‘immediate switching’ behaviours in 2014 with those of the presumably less politicized EP elections in 2009. We do that by employing the 2009 and 2014 PartiRep Election Study data. On the one hand, the article shows that split-ticket voting cannot be explained by economic voting, European identity, and attitudes towards integration in 2014. On the other hand, the unique configuration of the Belgian elections enables us to observe that the introduction of Spitzenkandidaten did enhance split-ticket voting for voters who could directly vote for this candidate (in Flanders), while this did not increase split-ticket voting among voters who could only indirectly support the candidate (in Wallonia).
id RCAP_1144f32ed48109f5be0da7eec7f5bbe5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014economic voting; European elections; politicization; split-ticket votingWhile European elections are often seen as remote from EU issues, considerations specifically linked to the EU came to the forefront in the wake of the 2014 European elections: the economic and financial crisis, the new process of designation of the European Commission President, and the alleged increase of Eurosceptic votes. This increased salience of political debates about the EU asks for a reconsideration of the ‘second-order nature’ of European elections. In this context, as in 2009, the Belgian electorate voted for the regional and European levels on the very same day. Belgian voters were thus offered the opportunity to split their ticket between both levels. This allows comparing the occurrence and determinants of these ‘immediate switching’ behaviours in 2014 with those of the presumably less politicized EP elections in 2009. We do that by employing the 2009 and 2014 PartiRep Election Study data. On the one hand, the article shows that split-ticket voting cannot be explained by economic voting, European identity, and attitudes towards integration in 2014. On the other hand, the unique configuration of the Belgian elections enables us to observe that the introduction of Spitzenkandidaten did enhance split-ticket voting for voters who could directly vote for this candidate (in Flanders), while this did not increase split-ticket voting among voters who could only indirectly support the candidate (in Wallonia).Cogitatio2016-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 116-1292183-2463reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/468https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/468/468Copyright (c) 2016 Camille Kelbel, Virginie Van Ingelgom, Soetkin Verhaegeninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKelbel, CamilleVan Ingelgom, VirginieVerhaegen, Soetkin2022-10-21T16:03:50Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:34:02.410104Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014
title Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014
spellingShingle Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014
Kelbel, Camille
economic voting; European elections; politicization; split-ticket voting
title_short Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014
title_full Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014
title_fullStr Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014
title_full_unstemmed Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014
title_sort Looking for the European Voter: Split-Ticket Voting in the Belgian Regional and European Elections of 2009 and 2014
author Kelbel, Camille
author_facet Kelbel, Camille
Van Ingelgom, Virginie
Verhaegen, Soetkin
author_role author
author2 Van Ingelgom, Virginie
Verhaegen, Soetkin
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kelbel, Camille
Van Ingelgom, Virginie
Verhaegen, Soetkin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv economic voting; European elections; politicization; split-ticket voting
topic economic voting; European elections; politicization; split-ticket voting
description While European elections are often seen as remote from EU issues, considerations specifically linked to the EU came to the forefront in the wake of the 2014 European elections: the economic and financial crisis, the new process of designation of the European Commission President, and the alleged increase of Eurosceptic votes. This increased salience of political debates about the EU asks for a reconsideration of the ‘second-order nature’ of European elections. In this context, as in 2009, the Belgian electorate voted for the regional and European levels on the very same day. Belgian voters were thus offered the opportunity to split their ticket between both levels. This allows comparing the occurrence and determinants of these ‘immediate switching’ behaviours in 2014 with those of the presumably less politicized EP elections in 2009. We do that by employing the 2009 and 2014 PartiRep Election Study data. On the one hand, the article shows that split-ticket voting cannot be explained by economic voting, European identity, and attitudes towards integration in 2014. On the other hand, the unique configuration of the Belgian elections enables us to observe that the introduction of Spitzenkandidaten did enhance split-ticket voting for voters who could directly vote for this candidate (in Flanders), while this did not increase split-ticket voting among voters who could only indirectly support the candidate (in Wallonia).
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/468
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/468
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i1.468
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/468/468
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Camille Kelbel, Virginie Van Ingelgom, Soetkin Verhaegen
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Camille Kelbel, Virginie Van Ingelgom, Soetkin Verhaegen
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 1 (2016): How Different Were the European Elections of 2014?; 116-129
2183-2463
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833590994286673920