Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Costa, L.
Publication Date: 2015
Other Authors: Mantha, V R, Silva, António, Fernandes, Ricardo J., Marinho, Daniel, Vilas Boas, J. Paulo, Machado, Leandro, Rouboa, A
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9274
Summary: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) plays an important role to quantify, understand and "observe" the water movements around the human body and its effects on drag (D). We aimed to investigate the flow effects around the swimmer and to compare the drag and drag coefficient (CD) values obtained from experiments (using cable velocimetry in a swimming pool) with those of CFD simulations for the two ventral gliding positions assumed during the breaststroke underwater cycle (with shoulders flexed and upper limbs extended above the head-GP1; with shoulders in neutral position and upper limbs extended along the trunk-GP2). Six well-trained breaststroke male swimmers (with reasonable homogeneity of body characteristics) participated in the experimental tests; afterwards a 3D swimmer model was created to fit within the limits of the sample body size profile. The standard k-ε turbulent model was used to simulate the fluid flow around the swimmer model. Velocity ranged from 1.30 to 1.70 m/s for GP1 and 1.10 to 1.50 m/s for GP2. Values found for GP1 and GP2 were lower for CFD than experimental ones. Nevertheless, both CFD and experimental drag/drag coefficient values displayed a tendency to jointly increase/decrease with velocity, except for GP2 CD where CFD and experimental values display opposite tendencies. Results suggest that CFD values obtained by single model approaches should be considered with caution due to small body shape and dimension differences to real swimmers. For better accuracy of CFD studies, realistic individual 3D models of swimmers are required, and specific kinematics respected.
id RCAP_0c7298f211b3d149eb88a0596d5b99a4
oai_identifier_str oai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/9274
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positionsAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaChildHumansHydrodynamicsImaging Three-DimensionalMalePostureRheologyYoung AdultSwimmingComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) plays an important role to quantify, understand and "observe" the water movements around the human body and its effects on drag (D). We aimed to investigate the flow effects around the swimmer and to compare the drag and drag coefficient (CD) values obtained from experiments (using cable velocimetry in a swimming pool) with those of CFD simulations for the two ventral gliding positions assumed during the breaststroke underwater cycle (with shoulders flexed and upper limbs extended above the head-GP1; with shoulders in neutral position and upper limbs extended along the trunk-GP2). Six well-trained breaststroke male swimmers (with reasonable homogeneity of body characteristics) participated in the experimental tests; afterwards a 3D swimmer model was created to fit within the limits of the sample body size profile. The standard k-ε turbulent model was used to simulate the fluid flow around the swimmer model. Velocity ranged from 1.30 to 1.70 m/s for GP1 and 1.10 to 1.50 m/s for GP2. Values found for GP1 and GP2 were lower for CFD than experimental ones. Nevertheless, both CFD and experimental drag/drag coefficient values displayed a tendency to jointly increase/decrease with velocity, except for GP2 CD where CFD and experimental values display opposite tendencies. Results suggest that CFD values obtained by single model approaches should be considered with caution due to small body shape and dimension differences to real swimmers. For better accuracy of CFD studies, realistic individual 3D models of swimmers are required, and specific kinematics respected.uBibliorumCosta, L.Mantha, V RSilva, AntónioFernandes, Ricardo J.Marinho, DanielVilas Boas, J. PauloMachado, LeandroRouboa, A2020-02-14T16:46:20Z2015-07-162015-07-16T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9274eng10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-11T14:32:57Zoai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/9274Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T01:19:00.120195Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions
title Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions
spellingShingle Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions
Costa, L.
Adolescent
Biomechanical Phenomena
Child
Humans
Hydrodynamics
Imaging Three-Dimensional
Male
Posture
Rheology
Young Adult
Swimming
title_short Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions
title_full Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions
title_fullStr Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions
title_full_unstemmed Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions
title_sort Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions
author Costa, L.
author_facet Costa, L.
Mantha, V R
Silva, António
Fernandes, Ricardo J.
Marinho, Daniel
Vilas Boas, J. Paulo
Machado, Leandro
Rouboa, A
author_role author
author2 Mantha, V R
Silva, António
Fernandes, Ricardo J.
Marinho, Daniel
Vilas Boas, J. Paulo
Machado, Leandro
Rouboa, A
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv uBibliorum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, L.
Mantha, V R
Silva, António
Fernandes, Ricardo J.
Marinho, Daniel
Vilas Boas, J. Paulo
Machado, Leandro
Rouboa, A
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adolescent
Biomechanical Phenomena
Child
Humans
Hydrodynamics
Imaging Three-Dimensional
Male
Posture
Rheology
Young Adult
Swimming
topic Adolescent
Biomechanical Phenomena
Child
Humans
Hydrodynamics
Imaging Three-Dimensional
Male
Posture
Rheology
Young Adult
Swimming
description Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) plays an important role to quantify, understand and "observe" the water movements around the human body and its effects on drag (D). We aimed to investigate the flow effects around the swimmer and to compare the drag and drag coefficient (CD) values obtained from experiments (using cable velocimetry in a swimming pool) with those of CFD simulations for the two ventral gliding positions assumed during the breaststroke underwater cycle (with shoulders flexed and upper limbs extended above the head-GP1; with shoulders in neutral position and upper limbs extended along the trunk-GP2). Six well-trained breaststroke male swimmers (with reasonable homogeneity of body characteristics) participated in the experimental tests; afterwards a 3D swimmer model was created to fit within the limits of the sample body size profile. The standard k-ε turbulent model was used to simulate the fluid flow around the swimmer model. Velocity ranged from 1.30 to 1.70 m/s for GP1 and 1.10 to 1.50 m/s for GP2. Values found for GP1 and GP2 were lower for CFD than experimental ones. Nevertheless, both CFD and experimental drag/drag coefficient values displayed a tendency to jointly increase/decrease with velocity, except for GP2 CD where CFD and experimental values display opposite tendencies. Results suggest that CFD values obtained by single model approaches should be considered with caution due to small body shape and dimension differences to real swimmers. For better accuracy of CFD studies, realistic individual 3D models of swimmers are required, and specific kinematics respected.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-16
2015-07-16T00:00:00Z
2020-02-14T16:46:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9274
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/9274
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600922743209984