Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Turton, P
Publication Date: 2010
Other Authors: Wright, C, White, S, Killaspy, H, Cardoso, G, DEMoBinc Group.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/351
Summary: OBJECTIVE: Service provision in psychiatric and social care is increasingly guided by recovery principles. However, little is known about the degree of consensus among stakeholders in diverse contexts on the components of care that most promote recovery. This study aimed to identify specific items of care that key stakeholders regard as most important in promoting recovery for people with longer-term mental health problems in institutional care, to measure consensus between and across stakeholder groups and countries, and to develop a conceptual framework of the most important domains of care. METHODS: Ten European countries in various stages of deinstitutionalization participated in a series of conventional three-round iterative Delphi exercises. In each country individuals in four separate expert groups (service users, mental health professionals, caregivers, and advocates) identified components of care that they considered important to recovery and then rated their group's suggestions in terms of importance. Median and consensus ratings were measured. High-ranking items were grouped into domains. RESULTS: A total of 4,098 separate items of care were proposed by the 40 participating groups. Eleven broad domains of care important for recovery were identified: social policy and human rights, social inclusion, self-management and autonomy, therapeutic interventions, governance, staffing, staff attitudes, institutional environment, postdischarge care, caregivers, and physical health care. Consensus between groups and countries was generally high, but some modest differences in priorities were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The most consistently highly rated consensus domain was therapeutic interventions. Domains and components of care related to recovery principles were also viewed as important across stakeholder groups.
id RCAP_0ba5a94a88febe1530c8e4ef42ebc8f6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.hff.min-saude.pt:10400.10/351
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi studyHospitais psiquiátricosCuidados de saúde de longa duraçãoPerturbações mentaisQuestionáriosTécnica DelphiOBJECTIVE: Service provision in psychiatric and social care is increasingly guided by recovery principles. However, little is known about the degree of consensus among stakeholders in diverse contexts on the components of care that most promote recovery. This study aimed to identify specific items of care that key stakeholders regard as most important in promoting recovery for people with longer-term mental health problems in institutional care, to measure consensus between and across stakeholder groups and countries, and to develop a conceptual framework of the most important domains of care. METHODS: Ten European countries in various stages of deinstitutionalization participated in a series of conventional three-round iterative Delphi exercises. In each country individuals in four separate expert groups (service users, mental health professionals, caregivers, and advocates) identified components of care that they considered important to recovery and then rated their group's suggestions in terms of importance. Median and consensus ratings were measured. High-ranking items were grouped into domains. RESULTS: A total of 4,098 separate items of care were proposed by the 40 participating groups. Eleven broad domains of care important for recovery were identified: social policy and human rights, social inclusion, self-management and autonomy, therapeutic interventions, governance, staffing, staff attitudes, institutional environment, postdischarge care, caregivers, and physical health care. Consensus between groups and countries was generally high, but some modest differences in priorities were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The most consistently highly rated consensus domain was therapeutic interventions. Domains and components of care related to recovery principles were also viewed as important across stakeholder groups.American Psychiatric AssociationUnidade Local de Saúde Amadora / SintraTurton, PWright, CWhite, SKillaspy, HCardoso, GDEMoBinc Group.2011-06-22T14:42:50Z20102010-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/351eng1557-9700info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-10T15:02:49Zoai:repositorio.hff.min-saude.pt:10400.10/351Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T01:15:50.538592Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study
title Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study
spellingShingle Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study
Turton, P
Hospitais psiquiátricos
Cuidados de saúde de longa duração
Perturbações mentais
Questionários
Técnica Delphi
title_short Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study
title_full Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study
title_fullStr Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study
title_sort Promoting recovery in long-term institutional mental health care: an international Delphi study
author Turton, P
author_facet Turton, P
Wright, C
White, S
Killaspy, H
Cardoso, G
DEMoBinc Group.
author_role author
author2 Wright, C
White, S
Killaspy, H
Cardoso, G
DEMoBinc Group.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Unidade Local de Saúde Amadora / Sintra
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Turton, P
Wright, C
White, S
Killaspy, H
Cardoso, G
DEMoBinc Group.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hospitais psiquiátricos
Cuidados de saúde de longa duração
Perturbações mentais
Questionários
Técnica Delphi
topic Hospitais psiquiátricos
Cuidados de saúde de longa duração
Perturbações mentais
Questionários
Técnica Delphi
description OBJECTIVE: Service provision in psychiatric and social care is increasingly guided by recovery principles. However, little is known about the degree of consensus among stakeholders in diverse contexts on the components of care that most promote recovery. This study aimed to identify specific items of care that key stakeholders regard as most important in promoting recovery for people with longer-term mental health problems in institutional care, to measure consensus between and across stakeholder groups and countries, and to develop a conceptual framework of the most important domains of care. METHODS: Ten European countries in various stages of deinstitutionalization participated in a series of conventional three-round iterative Delphi exercises. In each country individuals in four separate expert groups (service users, mental health professionals, caregivers, and advocates) identified components of care that they considered important to recovery and then rated their group's suggestions in terms of importance. Median and consensus ratings were measured. High-ranking items were grouped into domains. RESULTS: A total of 4,098 separate items of care were proposed by the 40 participating groups. Eleven broad domains of care important for recovery were identified: social policy and human rights, social inclusion, self-management and autonomy, therapeutic interventions, governance, staffing, staff attitudes, institutional environment, postdischarge care, caregivers, and physical health care. Consensus between groups and countries was generally high, but some modest differences in priorities were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The most consistently highly rated consensus domain was therapeutic interventions. Domains and components of care related to recovery principles were also viewed as important across stakeholder groups.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z
2011-06-22T14:42:50Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/351
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/351
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1557-9700
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Psychiatric Association
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Psychiatric Association
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600898804219904