Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2017 |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12952 |
Summary: | With data for Portugal we propose an index of housing comfort based on the Household Budget Survey. This index covers housing and durable goods grouped in two dimensions: basic comfort and complementary comfort. Taking this index as starting point we make two contributions. First we quantify the phenomena of poverty, richness, and inequality in housing comfort. Second, using an ordered probit model, we evaluate the determinants of housing comfort in Portugal. The results show significant rates of poverty (12.41%) and richness (22.03%). The evidence sustains that the differences between households derive mainly from complementary comfort and to a lesser extent from basic comfort items. Inequality in housing comfort, measured by the Gini coefficient, stands at 0.1263. The econometric study reveals that the region of residence of the household and the educational level and labor market state of the household reference person are among the most critical determinant factors of housing comfort. |
id |
RCAP_09b14ee4d7a0ebbecbbf13ddadc628cc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12952 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort indexHousing comfortInequalityPortugalPovertyRichnessWealthWith data for Portugal we propose an index of housing comfort based on the Household Budget Survey. This index covers housing and durable goods grouped in two dimensions: basic comfort and complementary comfort. Taking this index as starting point we make two contributions. First we quantify the phenomena of poverty, richness, and inequality in housing comfort. Second, using an ordered probit model, we evaluate the determinants of housing comfort in Portugal. The results show significant rates of poverty (12.41%) and richness (22.03%). The evidence sustains that the differences between households derive mainly from complementary comfort and to a lesser extent from basic comfort items. Inequality in housing comfort, measured by the Gini coefficient, stands at 0.1263. The econometric study reveals that the region of residence of the household and the educational level and labor market state of the household reference person are among the most critical determinant factors of housing comfort.IOS Press2017-04-17T13:50:19Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Z20172019-03-28T13:25:40Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/12952eng0747-966210.3233/JEM-170437Fernandes, C.Crespo, N.Simões, N.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T02:47:05Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12952Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:06:53.710706Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index |
title |
Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index |
spellingShingle |
Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index Fernandes, C. Housing comfort Inequality Portugal Poverty Richness Wealth |
title_short |
Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index |
title_full |
Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index |
title_fullStr |
Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index |
title_full_unstemmed |
Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index |
title_sort |
Poverty, richness, and inequality: evidence for Portugal using a housing comfort index |
author |
Fernandes, C. |
author_facet |
Fernandes, C. Crespo, N. Simões, N. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Crespo, N. Simões, N. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, C. Crespo, N. Simões, N. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Housing comfort Inequality Portugal Poverty Richness Wealth |
topic |
Housing comfort Inequality Portugal Poverty Richness Wealth |
description |
With data for Portugal we propose an index of housing comfort based on the Household Budget Survey. This index covers housing and durable goods grouped in two dimensions: basic comfort and complementary comfort. Taking this index as starting point we make two contributions. First we quantify the phenomena of poverty, richness, and inequality in housing comfort. Second, using an ordered probit model, we evaluate the determinants of housing comfort in Portugal. The results show significant rates of poverty (12.41%) and richness (22.03%). The evidence sustains that the differences between households derive mainly from complementary comfort and to a lesser extent from basic comfort items. Inequality in housing comfort, measured by the Gini coefficient, stands at 0.1263. The econometric study reveals that the region of residence of the household and the educational level and labor market state of the household reference person are among the most critical determinant factors of housing comfort. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-04-17T13:50:19Z 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z 2017 2019-03-28T13:25:40Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12952 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12952 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0747-9662 10.3233/JEM-170437 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IOS Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IOS Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597196157583360 |