Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hine, Nick
Publication Date: 2007
Other Authors: Alves, Gustavo R., Erbe, Heinz-H, Muller, Dieter, Alves, J. B. M., Pereira, C., Ferreira, José M., Sucar, Enrique, Herrera, Oriel, Chiang, Luciano, Garcia-Zúbia, Javier
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4979
Summary: Remote labs offer many unique advantages to students as they provide opportunities to access experiments and learning scenarios that would be otherwise unavailable. At the same time, however, these opportunities introduce real challenges to the institutions hosting the remote labs. This paper draws on the experiences of the REXNET project consortium to expose a number of these issues as a means of furthering the debate on the value of remote labs and the best practices in deploying them. The paper presents a brief outline of the various types of remote lab scenarios that might be deployed. It then describes the key human and technological actors that have an interest in or are intrinsic to a remote lab instance, with a description of the role of each actor and their interest. Some relationships between these various actors are then discussed with some factors that might influence those relationships. Finally some general issues are briefly described.
id RCAP_05e5ef8eb216dd6341b48c60b528cf2f
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/4979
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet projectRemote labsRemote experimentationStakeholdersRemote monitoring and controllingRemote labs offer many unique advantages to students as they provide opportunities to access experiments and learning scenarios that would be otherwise unavailable. At the same time, however, these opportunities introduce real challenges to the institutions hosting the remote labs. This paper draws on the experiences of the REXNET project consortium to expose a number of these issues as a means of furthering the debate on the value of remote labs and the best practices in deploying them. The paper presents a brief outline of the various types of remote lab scenarios that might be deployed. It then describes the key human and technological actors that have an interest in or are intrinsic to a remote lab instance, with a description of the role of each actor and their interest. Some relationships between these various actors are then discussed with some factors that might influence those relationships. Finally some general issues are briefly described.REPOSITÓRIO P.PORTOHine, NickAlves, Gustavo R.Erbe, Heinz-HMuller, DieterAlves, J. B. M.Pereira, C.Ferreira, José M.Sucar, EnriqueHerrera, OrielChiang, LucianoGarcia-Zúbia, Javier2014-09-23T08:48:29Z20072007-01-01T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4979enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-07T09:59:38Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/4979Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T00:24:41.912298Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project
title Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project
spellingShingle Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project
Hine, Nick
Remote labs
Remote experimentation
Stakeholders
Remote monitoring and controlling
title_short Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project
title_full Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project
title_fullStr Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project
title_full_unstemmed Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project
title_sort Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project
author Hine, Nick
author_facet Hine, Nick
Alves, Gustavo R.
Erbe, Heinz-H
Muller, Dieter
Alves, J. B. M.
Pereira, C.
Ferreira, José M.
Sucar, Enrique
Herrera, Oriel
Chiang, Luciano
Garcia-Zúbia, Javier
author_role author
author2 Alves, Gustavo R.
Erbe, Heinz-H
Muller, Dieter
Alves, J. B. M.
Pereira, C.
Ferreira, José M.
Sucar, Enrique
Herrera, Oriel
Chiang, Luciano
Garcia-Zúbia, Javier
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv REPOSITÓRIO P.PORTO
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hine, Nick
Alves, Gustavo R.
Erbe, Heinz-H
Muller, Dieter
Alves, J. B. M.
Pereira, C.
Ferreira, José M.
Sucar, Enrique
Herrera, Oriel
Chiang, Luciano
Garcia-Zúbia, Javier
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Remote labs
Remote experimentation
Stakeholders
Remote monitoring and controlling
topic Remote labs
Remote experimentation
Stakeholders
Remote monitoring and controlling
description Remote labs offer many unique advantages to students as they provide opportunities to access experiments and learning scenarios that would be otherwise unavailable. At the same time, however, these opportunities introduce real challenges to the institutions hosting the remote labs. This paper draws on the experiences of the REXNET project consortium to expose a number of these issues as a means of furthering the debate on the value of remote labs and the best practices in deploying them. The paper presents a brief outline of the various types of remote lab scenarios that might be deployed. It then describes the key human and technological actors that have an interest in or are intrinsic to a remote lab instance, with a description of the role of each actor and their interest. Some relationships between these various actors are then discussed with some factors that might influence those relationships. Finally some general issues are briefly described.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z
2014-09-23T08:48:29Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv conference object
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4979
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4979
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600525432520704