Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2007 |
| Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4979 |
Summary: | Remote labs offer many unique advantages to students as they provide opportunities to access experiments and learning scenarios that would be otherwise unavailable. At the same time, however, these opportunities introduce real challenges to the institutions hosting the remote labs. This paper draws on the experiences of the REXNET project consortium to expose a number of these issues as a means of furthering the debate on the value of remote labs and the best practices in deploying them. The paper presents a brief outline of the various types of remote lab scenarios that might be deployed. It then describes the key human and technological actors that have an interest in or are intrinsic to a remote lab instance, with a description of the role of each actor and their interest. Some relationships between these various actors are then discussed with some factors that might influence those relationships. Finally some general issues are briefly described. |
| id |
RCAP_05e5ef8eb216dd6341b48c60b528cf2f |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/4979 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet projectRemote labsRemote experimentationStakeholdersRemote monitoring and controllingRemote labs offer many unique advantages to students as they provide opportunities to access experiments and learning scenarios that would be otherwise unavailable. At the same time, however, these opportunities introduce real challenges to the institutions hosting the remote labs. This paper draws on the experiences of the REXNET project consortium to expose a number of these issues as a means of furthering the debate on the value of remote labs and the best practices in deploying them. The paper presents a brief outline of the various types of remote lab scenarios that might be deployed. It then describes the key human and technological actors that have an interest in or are intrinsic to a remote lab instance, with a description of the role of each actor and their interest. Some relationships between these various actors are then discussed with some factors that might influence those relationships. Finally some general issues are briefly described.REPOSITÓRIO P.PORTOHine, NickAlves, Gustavo R.Erbe, Heinz-HMuller, DieterAlves, J. B. M.Pereira, C.Ferreira, José M.Sucar, EnriqueHerrera, OrielChiang, LucianoGarcia-Zúbia, Javier2014-09-23T08:48:29Z20072007-01-01T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4979enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-07T09:59:38Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/4979Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T00:24:41.912298Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project |
| title |
Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project |
| spellingShingle |
Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project Hine, Nick Remote labs Remote experimentation Stakeholders Remote monitoring and controlling |
| title_short |
Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project |
| title_full |
Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project |
| title_fullStr |
Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project |
| title_sort |
Institutional factors governing the deployment of remote experiments: lessons from the rexnet project |
| author |
Hine, Nick |
| author_facet |
Hine, Nick Alves, Gustavo R. Erbe, Heinz-H Muller, Dieter Alves, J. B. M. Pereira, C. Ferreira, José M. Sucar, Enrique Herrera, Oriel Chiang, Luciano Garcia-Zúbia, Javier |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Alves, Gustavo R. Erbe, Heinz-H Muller, Dieter Alves, J. B. M. Pereira, C. Ferreira, José M. Sucar, Enrique Herrera, Oriel Chiang, Luciano Garcia-Zúbia, Javier |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
REPOSITÓRIO P.PORTO |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hine, Nick Alves, Gustavo R. Erbe, Heinz-H Muller, Dieter Alves, J. B. M. Pereira, C. Ferreira, José M. Sucar, Enrique Herrera, Oriel Chiang, Luciano Garcia-Zúbia, Javier |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Remote labs Remote experimentation Stakeholders Remote monitoring and controlling |
| topic |
Remote labs Remote experimentation Stakeholders Remote monitoring and controlling |
| description |
Remote labs offer many unique advantages to students as they provide opportunities to access experiments and learning scenarios that would be otherwise unavailable. At the same time, however, these opportunities introduce real challenges to the institutions hosting the remote labs. This paper draws on the experiences of the REXNET project consortium to expose a number of these issues as a means of furthering the debate on the value of remote labs and the best practices in deploying them. The paper presents a brief outline of the various types of remote lab scenarios that might be deployed. It then describes the key human and technological actors that have an interest in or are intrinsic to a remote lab instance, with a description of the role of each actor and their interest. Some relationships between these various actors are then discussed with some factors that might influence those relationships. Finally some general issues are briefly described. |
| publishDate |
2007 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z 2014-09-23T08:48:29Z |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference object |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4979 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4979 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833600525432520704 |