Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-Inside

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Orlando Jose de Almeida Branco Simões
Publication Date: 2021
Format: Master thesis
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/134447
Summary: Purpose To study pain and sensory alterations of 75 (three cohorts of 25 patients) athletic patients that underwent different anatomic arthroscopic ACLr surgery techniques. The cohorts were divided in the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft cohort, the quadruple strand semitendinosus and gracilis autograft cohort and the quadruple strand semitendinosus autograft all-inside cohort. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pain and sensory alterations. All these patients followed a similar rehabilitation protocol, being 2 years the minimal follow-up time. Pain was characterized by duration and anatomical location and sensory deficits were evaluated concerning duration and affected area. Patients also scored on 3 different subjective tests: KWT; LKSS and IKDC-SKF and were divided according to its TALS. Results The mean AKP duration amongst the 3 cohorts was 1.8 ± 4.5 months and was significantly smaller in the 4ST/G cohort. The majority of patients of the BTB cohort located pain on the patellar tendon while patients in the 4ST/G and All-Inside cohorts referred that it was diffuse. At 15 days' post-surgery, hypoesthesia was reported by 42 patients and was significantly higher on the BTB cohort and less in the All-Inside cohort. At 2-year followup, the All-Inside cohort had no patients with hypoesthesia. In the BTB cohort, the sensitive alterations were only located on the area innervated by the IPBSN. The 4ST/G cohort located the hypoesthesia in the area innervated by the IPBSN and in the area of the LSCN. The All-Inside group located the sensitive alterations mostly in the LSCN. The KWT was painful in BTB and 4ST/G patients and reported 0% for the All-Inside cohort. No statistic relevance was found for the IKDC-SKF and LKSS tests. Conclusions All cohorts referred pain and sensitive alterations. The arthroscopic ACLr using BTB autograft seems to condition a higher number of anterior knee pain and hypoesthesia on medium post-operative outcomes and KWT was more often reported. The 4ST/G group had the smallest duration of AKP. The All-Inside cohort showed, globally, a lower number of complaints and a shorter time of symptom persistence, namely in terms of sensory deficit in the postoperative period.
id RCAP_040e61a44aee78432e984ef0f197f9ca
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/134447
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-InsideMedicina clínicaClinical medicinePurpose To study pain and sensory alterations of 75 (three cohorts of 25 patients) athletic patients that underwent different anatomic arthroscopic ACLr surgery techniques. The cohorts were divided in the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft cohort, the quadruple strand semitendinosus and gracilis autograft cohort and the quadruple strand semitendinosus autograft all-inside cohort. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pain and sensory alterations. All these patients followed a similar rehabilitation protocol, being 2 years the minimal follow-up time. Pain was characterized by duration and anatomical location and sensory deficits were evaluated concerning duration and affected area. Patients also scored on 3 different subjective tests: KWT; LKSS and IKDC-SKF and were divided according to its TALS. Results The mean AKP duration amongst the 3 cohorts was 1.8 ± 4.5 months and was significantly smaller in the 4ST/G cohort. The majority of patients of the BTB cohort located pain on the patellar tendon while patients in the 4ST/G and All-Inside cohorts referred that it was diffuse. At 15 days' post-surgery, hypoesthesia was reported by 42 patients and was significantly higher on the BTB cohort and less in the All-Inside cohort. At 2-year followup, the All-Inside cohort had no patients with hypoesthesia. In the BTB cohort, the sensitive alterations were only located on the area innervated by the IPBSN. The 4ST/G cohort located the hypoesthesia in the area innervated by the IPBSN and in the area of the LSCN. The All-Inside group located the sensitive alterations mostly in the LSCN. The KWT was painful in BTB and 4ST/G patients and reported 0% for the All-Inside cohort. No statistic relevance was found for the IKDC-SKF and LKSS tests. Conclusions All cohorts referred pain and sensitive alterations. The arthroscopic ACLr using BTB autograft seems to condition a higher number of anterior knee pain and hypoesthesia on medium post-operative outcomes and KWT was more often reported. The 4ST/G group had the smallest duration of AKP. The All-Inside cohort showed, globally, a lower number of complaints and a shorter time of symptom persistence, namely in terms of sensory deficit in the postoperative period.2021-05-282021-05-28T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/134447engOrlando Jose de Almeida Branco Simõesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-27T19:51:41Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/134447Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T23:35:24.300557Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-Inside
title Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-Inside
spellingShingle Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-Inside
Orlando Jose de Almeida Branco Simões
Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
title_short Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-Inside
title_full Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-Inside
title_fullStr Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-Inside
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-Inside
title_sort Anterior Knee Pain and Sensitivity Deficits after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: BTB vs 4 ST/G vs All-Inside
author Orlando Jose de Almeida Branco Simões
author_facet Orlando Jose de Almeida Branco Simões
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Orlando Jose de Almeida Branco Simões
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
topic Medicina clínica
Clinical medicine
description Purpose To study pain and sensory alterations of 75 (three cohorts of 25 patients) athletic patients that underwent different anatomic arthroscopic ACLr surgery techniques. The cohorts were divided in the bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft cohort, the quadruple strand semitendinosus and gracilis autograft cohort and the quadruple strand semitendinosus autograft all-inside cohort. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pain and sensory alterations. All these patients followed a similar rehabilitation protocol, being 2 years the minimal follow-up time. Pain was characterized by duration and anatomical location and sensory deficits were evaluated concerning duration and affected area. Patients also scored on 3 different subjective tests: KWT; LKSS and IKDC-SKF and were divided according to its TALS. Results The mean AKP duration amongst the 3 cohorts was 1.8 ± 4.5 months and was significantly smaller in the 4ST/G cohort. The majority of patients of the BTB cohort located pain on the patellar tendon while patients in the 4ST/G and All-Inside cohorts referred that it was diffuse. At 15 days' post-surgery, hypoesthesia was reported by 42 patients and was significantly higher on the BTB cohort and less in the All-Inside cohort. At 2-year followup, the All-Inside cohort had no patients with hypoesthesia. In the BTB cohort, the sensitive alterations were only located on the area innervated by the IPBSN. The 4ST/G cohort located the hypoesthesia in the area innervated by the IPBSN and in the area of the LSCN. The All-Inside group located the sensitive alterations mostly in the LSCN. The KWT was painful in BTB and 4ST/G patients and reported 0% for the All-Inside cohort. No statistic relevance was found for the IKDC-SKF and LKSS tests. Conclusions All cohorts referred pain and sensitive alterations. The arthroscopic ACLr using BTB autograft seems to condition a higher number of anterior knee pain and hypoesthesia on medium post-operative outcomes and KWT was more often reported. The 4ST/G group had the smallest duration of AKP. The All-Inside cohort showed, globally, a lower number of complaints and a shorter time of symptom persistence, namely in terms of sensory deficit in the postoperative period.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-28
2021-05-28T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/134447
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/134447
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600214666051584