Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplus
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2025 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) |
| Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1370 |
Resumo: | The overall impact of programs embedded in information technology applications have special characteristics. The structural offer of new technology programs has, today, three options: Free software, Open source, and paid software. The paper discusses each offer and explores weaknesses and strengths analysis of the goods and services produced. Strengths, weaknesses, and benefits advocated are increasing or decreasing private and Welfare surplus impact. Different offers, or a mix of offers, deserve attention because the resulting framework implied users risks, regulations, collective and private property rights, and benefits changing more Welfare surplus. As a result, we guess software innovation is better suited to a common good or collective property or better to a common math-based language than a private right. We suggest bypassing Free, Open source, and paid offers and the conflict based on the property rights system to increase the Welfare surplus. |
| id |
PROCESSUS_da3a1ed7f2f7205ba692cc0ffa64b05d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/1370 |
| network_acronym_str |
PROCESSUS |
| network_name_str |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplusAI programsFree softwareOpen SourceWelfareCollective goodsThe overall impact of programs embedded in information technology applications have special characteristics. The structural offer of new technology programs has, today, three options: Free software, Open source, and paid software. The paper discusses each offer and explores weaknesses and strengths analysis of the goods and services produced. Strengths, weaknesses, and benefits advocated are increasing or decreasing private and Welfare surplus impact. Different offers, or a mix of offers, deserve attention because the resulting framework implied users risks, regulations, collective and private property rights, and benefits changing more Welfare surplus. As a result, we guess software innovation is better suited to a common good or collective property or better to a common math-based language than a private right. We suggest bypassing Free, Open source, and paid offers and the conflict based on the property rights system to increase the Welfare surplus.Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus2025-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/137010.5281/zenodo.14990843Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; v. 16 n. 50 (2025): Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; e501370Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 16 No. 50 (2025): Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; e501370Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 16 Núm. 50 (2025): Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; e5013702178-20082237-2342reponame:Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)instname:Faculdade Processus (DF)instacron:PROCESSUSenghttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1370/1313Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiroshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAveni, Alessandro2025-03-07T19:01:53Zoai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/1370Revistahttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/PRIhttps://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/oaijonas.goncalves@institutoprocessus.com.br2178-20082178-2008opendoar:2025-03-07T19:01:53Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) - Faculdade Processus (DF)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplus |
| title |
Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplus |
| spellingShingle |
Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplus Aveni, Alessandro AI programs Free software Open Source Welfare Collective goods |
| title_short |
Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplus |
| title_full |
Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplus |
| title_fullStr |
Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplus |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplus |
| title_sort |
Free, open source and paid programs offer. Increasing social surplus |
| author |
Aveni, Alessandro |
| author_facet |
Aveni, Alessandro |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aveni, Alessandro |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
AI programs Free software Open Source Welfare Collective goods |
| topic |
AI programs Free software Open Source Welfare Collective goods |
| description |
The overall impact of programs embedded in information technology applications have special characteristics. The structural offer of new technology programs has, today, three options: Free software, Open source, and paid software. The paper discusses each offer and explores weaknesses and strengths analysis of the goods and services produced. Strengths, weaknesses, and benefits advocated are increasing or decreasing private and Welfare surplus impact. Different offers, or a mix of offers, deserve attention because the resulting framework implied users risks, regulations, collective and private property rights, and benefits changing more Welfare surplus. As a result, we guess software innovation is better suited to a common good or collective property or better to a common math-based language than a private right. We suggest bypassing Free, Open source, and paid offers and the conflict based on the property rights system to increase the Welfare surplus. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-03-07 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1370 10.5281/zenodo.14990843 |
| url |
https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1370 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5281/zenodo.14990843 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1370/1313 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Processus - UniProcessus |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; v. 16 n. 50 (2025): Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; e501370 Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 16 No. 50 (2025): Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; e501370 Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, jurídicos e Financeiros; Vol. 16 Núm. 50 (2025): Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros; e501370 2178-2008 2237-2342 reponame:Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) instname:Faculdade Processus (DF) instacron:PROCESSUS |
| instname_str |
Faculdade Processus (DF) |
| instacron_str |
PROCESSUS |
| institution |
PROCESSUS |
| reponame_str |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) |
| collection |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) - Faculdade Processus (DF) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
jonas.goncalves@institutoprocessus.com.br |
| _version_ |
1831478069624307712 |