Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian law
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos |
Download full: | http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/1729 |
Summary: | The general objective of this study was to analyze the impact of fake news on the exercise of freedom of expression in favor of the challenge of balancing the protection of freedom of expression with the need to combat the dissemination of false information that has legal, social and democratic implications. To this end, as a methodological aspect, a qualitative approach was used, implemented by bibliographical research and documentary analysis. Firstly, we sought to address concepts relating to freedom of expression and the phenomenon of fake news. This right to freedom of expression is a central institute for guaranteeing democracy, oversight of powers and social development. Furthermore, as a fundamental right provided for in art. 5th, IV, of the Federal Constitution of 1988, although there is no absolute fundamental right, it ensures, among others, the fundamental rights to expression of thought, preservation of honor, privacy and public security. Diametrically, there is the propagation of fake news, synthetically conceptualized as the proliferation of false information with a strong potential to denigrate institutions and fragment the social fabric, currently enabled by the growth of digital technologies and social networks, which have transformed the mode of dissemination and/or or dissemination of information. This information dynamic is a legal challenge, as it calls into question the limit between freedom of expression and the fight against disinformation, thus justifying the relevance of this research to the academic field, as it enables the study of the field of Constitutional Law as well as of Digital Law and also addresses social dynamics that affect democratic stability and adequate coexistence in society. As a result, legislative and jurisdictional actions were identified with great relevance in the 2018 and 2022 electoral periods, as well as during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the legislative field, although there is a civil law on the internet, it was found that the legislation lacks a clear and robust approach to adequately hold those involved accountable, including digital platforms, and also guarantee the protection of fundamental rights without the means of protection turn into prior censorship of freedom of expression. In the judicial field, the actions of the STF and TSE made it possible to combat misinformation, especially during the electoral period. However, improvements are necessary to provide adequate media education to citizens for their development in skills that allow them to have a critical view of the information consumed, culminating in the strengthening of democratic institutions. |
id |
JRG_c0712db6450c24b5891dae633cf851f3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistajrg.com:article/1729 |
network_acronym_str |
JRG |
network_name_str |
Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian lawLiberdade de expressão e o fenômeno das “Fake News” no direito brasileiroDireito à liberdade de expressãoCombate à desinformaçãoFake NewsRight to freedom of expressionCombating disinformationFake NewsThe general objective of this study was to analyze the impact of fake news on the exercise of freedom of expression in favor of the challenge of balancing the protection of freedom of expression with the need to combat the dissemination of false information that has legal, social and democratic implications. To this end, as a methodological aspect, a qualitative approach was used, implemented by bibliographical research and documentary analysis. Firstly, we sought to address concepts relating to freedom of expression and the phenomenon of fake news. This right to freedom of expression is a central institute for guaranteeing democracy, oversight of powers and social development. Furthermore, as a fundamental right provided for in art. 5th, IV, of the Federal Constitution of 1988, although there is no absolute fundamental right, it ensures, among others, the fundamental rights to expression of thought, preservation of honor, privacy and public security. Diametrically, there is the propagation of fake news, synthetically conceptualized as the proliferation of false information with a strong potential to denigrate institutions and fragment the social fabric, currently enabled by the growth of digital technologies and social networks, which have transformed the mode of dissemination and/or or dissemination of information. This information dynamic is a legal challenge, as it calls into question the limit between freedom of expression and the fight against disinformation, thus justifying the relevance of this research to the academic field, as it enables the study of the field of Constitutional Law as well as of Digital Law and also addresses social dynamics that affect democratic stability and adequate coexistence in society. As a result, legislative and jurisdictional actions were identified with great relevance in the 2018 and 2022 electoral periods, as well as during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the legislative field, although there is a civil law on the internet, it was found that the legislation lacks a clear and robust approach to adequately hold those involved accountable, including digital platforms, and also guarantee the protection of fundamental rights without the means of protection turn into prior censorship of freedom of expression. In the judicial field, the actions of the STF and TSE made it possible to combat misinformation, especially during the electoral period. However, improvements are necessary to provide adequate media education to citizens for their development in skills that allow them to have a critical view of the information consumed, culminating in the strengthening of democratic institutions.O presente estudo teve por objetivo geral analisar o impacto das fake news no exercício da liberdade de expressão em prol do desafio de equilibrar a proteção da liberdade de expressão com a necessidade de combater a disseminação de informações falsas condutoras de implicações legais, sociais e democráticas. Para tanto, utilizou-se, enquanto aspecto metodológico, da abordagem de cunho qualitativo, concretizada por pesquisa bibliográfica e análise documental. Primeiramente, procurou-se abordar os conceitos alusivos à liberdade de expressão e o fenômeno das fake news. Tal direito à liberdade de expressão é instituto central para garantia da democracia, fiscalização dos poderes e desenvolvimento social. Outrossim, enquanto direito fundamental previsto no art. 5º, IV, da Constituição Federal de 1988, ainda que não se tenha direito fundamental absoluto, propicia garantir, além de outros, os direitos fundamentais à manifestação de pensamento, preservação da honra, da privacidade e da segurança pública. Diametralmente, encontra-se a propagação das fake news, sinteticamente conceituada com proliferação de informações falsas com forte potencial de denegrir instituições e fragmentar o tecido social, atualmente propiciadas pelo crescimento de tecnologias digitais e redes sociais, as quais transformaram o modo de divulgação e/ou disseminação de informação. Essa dinâmica de informação é um desafio jurídico, porquanto coloca em questão o limite entre a liberdade de expressão e o combate à desinformação, justificando, pois, a relevância desta pesquisa para o âmbito acadêmico, porquanto possibilita o estudo ao campo do Direito Constitucional como também do Direito Digital e, ainda, aborda dinâmica de cunho social que afeta a estabilidade democrática e convivência adequada na sociedade. Como resultado, identificou-se atuações legislativas e jurisdicionais com grande relevância nos períodos eleitorais de 2018 e 2022, bem como durante a pandemia do COVID-19. No campo legislativo, embora exista a lei do marco civil da internet, constatou-se que a legislação carece de abordagem clara e robusta para responsabilizar adequadamente os envolvidos, inclusive as plataformas digitais e também garantir a proteção aos direitos fundamentais sem que os meios de tutela se transformem em censura prévia à liberdade de expressão. No campo judicial, a atuação do STF e do TSE possibilitou combater desinformações, principalmente no período eleitoral. Todavia, tornam-se necessárias melhorias para propiciar condizente educação midiática ao cidadão para seu desenvolvimento em competências que lhe permita ter visão crítica sobre as informações consumidas, culminando em fortalecimento das instituições democráticas. Editora JRG2024-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/172910.55892/jrg.v7i15.1729ark:/57118/JRG.v7i15.1729JRG Journal of Academic Studies; Vol. 7 No. 15 (2024): Journal of JRG Academic Studies; e151729JRG Journal of Academic Studies ; Vol. 7 Núm. 15 (2024): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; e151729JRG Journal of Academic Studies; V. 7 N. 15 (2024): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; e151729Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; v. 7 n. 15 (2024): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; e1517292595-1661ark:/57118/jrg.v7i15reponame:Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicosinstname:Editora JRGinstacron:JRGporhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/1729/1402https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJesus, Welder Bezerra deSilva, Jefferson Franco2024-12-05T18:51:34Zoai:ojs2.revistajrg.com:article/1729Revistahttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrgPRIhttp://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/oaiprofessorjonas@gmail.com||2595-16612595-1661opendoar:2024-12-05T18:51:34Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos - Editora JRGfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian law Liberdade de expressão e o fenômeno das “Fake News” no direito brasileiro |
title |
Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian law |
spellingShingle |
Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian law Jesus, Welder Bezerra de Direito à liberdade de expressão Combate à desinformação Fake News Right to freedom of expression Combating disinformation Fake News |
title_short |
Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian law |
title_full |
Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian law |
title_fullStr |
Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian law |
title_sort |
Freedom of expression and the phenomenon of “Fake News” in Brazilian law |
author |
Jesus, Welder Bezerra de |
author_facet |
Jesus, Welder Bezerra de Silva, Jefferson Franco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Jefferson Franco |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jesus, Welder Bezerra de Silva, Jefferson Franco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito à liberdade de expressão Combate à desinformação Fake News Right to freedom of expression Combating disinformation Fake News |
topic |
Direito à liberdade de expressão Combate à desinformação Fake News Right to freedom of expression Combating disinformation Fake News |
description |
The general objective of this study was to analyze the impact of fake news on the exercise of freedom of expression in favor of the challenge of balancing the protection of freedom of expression with the need to combat the dissemination of false information that has legal, social and democratic implications. To this end, as a methodological aspect, a qualitative approach was used, implemented by bibliographical research and documentary analysis. Firstly, we sought to address concepts relating to freedom of expression and the phenomenon of fake news. This right to freedom of expression is a central institute for guaranteeing democracy, oversight of powers and social development. Furthermore, as a fundamental right provided for in art. 5th, IV, of the Federal Constitution of 1988, although there is no absolute fundamental right, it ensures, among others, the fundamental rights to expression of thought, preservation of honor, privacy and public security. Diametrically, there is the propagation of fake news, synthetically conceptualized as the proliferation of false information with a strong potential to denigrate institutions and fragment the social fabric, currently enabled by the growth of digital technologies and social networks, which have transformed the mode of dissemination and/or or dissemination of information. This information dynamic is a legal challenge, as it calls into question the limit between freedom of expression and the fight against disinformation, thus justifying the relevance of this research to the academic field, as it enables the study of the field of Constitutional Law as well as of Digital Law and also addresses social dynamics that affect democratic stability and adequate coexistence in society. As a result, legislative and jurisdictional actions were identified with great relevance in the 2018 and 2022 electoral periods, as well as during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the legislative field, although there is a civil law on the internet, it was found that the legislation lacks a clear and robust approach to adequately hold those involved accountable, including digital platforms, and also guarantee the protection of fundamental rights without the means of protection turn into prior censorship of freedom of expression. In the judicial field, the actions of the STF and TSE made it possible to combat misinformation, especially during the electoral period. However, improvements are necessary to provide adequate media education to citizens for their development in skills that allow them to have a critical view of the information consumed, culminating in the strengthening of democratic institutions. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-12-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/1729 10.55892/jrg.v7i15.1729 ark:/57118/JRG.v7i15.1729 |
url |
http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/1729 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.55892/jrg.v7i15.1729 ark:/57118/JRG.v7i15.1729 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/1729/1402 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora JRG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora JRG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
JRG Journal of Academic Studies; Vol. 7 No. 15 (2024): Journal of JRG Academic Studies; e151729 JRG Journal of Academic Studies ; Vol. 7 Núm. 15 (2024): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; e151729 JRG Journal of Academic Studies; V. 7 N. 15 (2024): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; e151729 Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos ; v. 7 n. 15 (2024): Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos; e151729 2595-1661 ark:/57118/jrg.v7i15 reponame:Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos instname:Editora JRG instacron:JRG |
instname_str |
Editora JRG |
instacron_str |
JRG |
institution |
JRG |
reponame_str |
Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos |
collection |
Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos - Editora JRG |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
professorjonas@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1831507800178556928 |