Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Einstein (São Paulo) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100281 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: This was a descriptive study performed at a public tertiary care university hospital gathering prescription, sociodemographic and hospitalization data of inpatients admitted in 2014 who used antimicrobial drugs. This data were obtained from the hospital electronic database. The antimicrobial data were classified according to the anatomical, therapeutic chemical/defined daily dose per 1,000 inpatients. An exploratory analysis was performed using principal component analysis. Results: A total of 5,182 inpatients were prescribed surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Of the total antimicrobial use, 11.7% were for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The orthopedic, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative units, and postoperative intensive care unit comprised more than half of the total surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use (56.3%). The duration of antimicrobial use of these units were 2.2, 2.0, and 1.4 days, respectively. Third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones had the longest use among antimicrobial classes. Conclusion: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was inadequate in the orthopedic, postoperative intensive care, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative, gynecology and obstetrics, and otolaryngology units. Therefore, the development and implementation of additional strategies to promote surgical antibiotic stewardship at hospitals are essential. |
id |
IIEPAE-1_e566e98c3d8d5632cf8664e8f07f84ea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1679-45082020000100281 |
network_acronym_str |
IIEPAE-1 |
network_name_str |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence?Drug utilization reviewAntibiotic prophylaxisDrug resistance, microbialSurgical wound infection/prevention & controlInfection controlABSTRACT Objective: To assess the surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: This was a descriptive study performed at a public tertiary care university hospital gathering prescription, sociodemographic and hospitalization data of inpatients admitted in 2014 who used antimicrobial drugs. This data were obtained from the hospital electronic database. The antimicrobial data were classified according to the anatomical, therapeutic chemical/defined daily dose per 1,000 inpatients. An exploratory analysis was performed using principal component analysis. Results: A total of 5,182 inpatients were prescribed surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Of the total antimicrobial use, 11.7% were for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The orthopedic, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative units, and postoperative intensive care unit comprised more than half of the total surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use (56.3%). The duration of antimicrobial use of these units were 2.2, 2.0, and 1.4 days, respectively. Third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones had the longest use among antimicrobial classes. Conclusion: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was inadequate in the orthopedic, postoperative intensive care, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative, gynecology and obstetrics, and otolaryngology units. Therefore, the development and implementation of additional strategies to promote surgical antibiotic stewardship at hospitals are essential.Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100281einstein (São Paulo) v.18 2020reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)instacron:IIEPAE10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao5427info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira,Lucas BorgesFeliciano,Cinara SilvaSiqueira,Diego SilvaBellissimo-Rodrigues,FernandoPereira,Leonardo Régis Leiraeng2020-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-45082020000100281Revistahttps://journal.einstein.br/pt-br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@einstein.br2317-63851679-4508opendoar:2020-11-17T00:00Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence? |
title |
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence? |
spellingShingle |
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence? Pereira,Lucas Borges Drug utilization review Antibiotic prophylaxis Drug resistance, microbial Surgical wound infection/prevention & control Infection control |
title_short |
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence? |
title_full |
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence? |
title_fullStr |
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence? |
title_sort |
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: is the clinical practice based on evidence? |
author |
Pereira,Lucas Borges |
author_facet |
Pereira,Lucas Borges Feliciano,Cinara Silva Siqueira,Diego Silva Bellissimo-Rodrigues,Fernando Pereira,Leonardo Régis Leira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Feliciano,Cinara Silva Siqueira,Diego Silva Bellissimo-Rodrigues,Fernando Pereira,Leonardo Régis Leira |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira,Lucas Borges Feliciano,Cinara Silva Siqueira,Diego Silva Bellissimo-Rodrigues,Fernando Pereira,Leonardo Régis Leira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Drug utilization review Antibiotic prophylaxis Drug resistance, microbial Surgical wound infection/prevention & control Infection control |
topic |
Drug utilization review Antibiotic prophylaxis Drug resistance, microbial Surgical wound infection/prevention & control Infection control |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: This was a descriptive study performed at a public tertiary care university hospital gathering prescription, sociodemographic and hospitalization data of inpatients admitted in 2014 who used antimicrobial drugs. This data were obtained from the hospital electronic database. The antimicrobial data were classified according to the anatomical, therapeutic chemical/defined daily dose per 1,000 inpatients. An exploratory analysis was performed using principal component analysis. Results: A total of 5,182 inpatients were prescribed surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Of the total antimicrobial use, 11.7% were for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The orthopedic, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative units, and postoperative intensive care unit comprised more than half of the total surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use (56.3%). The duration of antimicrobial use of these units were 2.2, 2.0, and 1.4 days, respectively. Third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones had the longest use among antimicrobial classes. Conclusion: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was inadequate in the orthopedic, postoperative intensive care, thoracic and cardiovascular postoperative, gynecology and obstetrics, and otolaryngology units. Therefore, the development and implementation of additional strategies to promote surgical antibiotic stewardship at hospitals are essential. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100281 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100281 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao5427 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
einstein (São Paulo) v.18 2020 reponame:Einstein (São Paulo) instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) instacron:IIEPAE |
instname_str |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) |
instacron_str |
IIEPAE |
institution |
IIEPAE |
reponame_str |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
collection |
Einstein (São Paulo) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@einstein.br |
_version_ |
1752129910166519808 |