Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictory
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | por |
| Source: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
| Download full: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/314 |
Summary: | This article analyzes the permanence of the Inquisitory culture in Latin America and the weight of the Inquisitory mentality within the Brazilian criminal process, especially in the preliminary phase, which deals with the main nucleus of the probative formation used by the judge in the sentence, in order to answer the following problem: what are the main obstacles in the Brazilian criminal process today so that there is an effectively contradictory judgment? For this purpose, it is evaluated through the study of classical and contemporary criminal process doctrines the implications on the legitimacy admitted by the Brazilian criminal process, mainly through the “dirty game” brought by the breach of article 155 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which contaminates the magistrate with the police inquiry and in conjunction with signifiers such as “free conviction” and “real truth” serve as obstacles to judgment based solely on contradictory acts and the participation of all parties involved in the process. |
| id |
IBRASPP-1_264008f7e3b95d91cf810cf0fd9a36e7 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/314 |
| network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
| network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictoryNeoinquisitorialismo processual penal e a contaminação do julgador com os atos de investigação: a burla interna no processo penal brasileiro como obstáculo ao contraditórioCriminal proceedingsInquisitive cultureContradictoryPolice Inquiry.Processo penalCultura inquisitóriaContraditórioInquérito policial.This article analyzes the permanence of the Inquisitory culture in Latin America and the weight of the Inquisitory mentality within the Brazilian criminal process, especially in the preliminary phase, which deals with the main nucleus of the probative formation used by the judge in the sentence, in order to answer the following problem: what are the main obstacles in the Brazilian criminal process today so that there is an effectively contradictory judgment? For this purpose, it is evaluated through the study of classical and contemporary criminal process doctrines the implications on the legitimacy admitted by the Brazilian criminal process, mainly through the “dirty game” brought by the breach of article 155 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which contaminates the magistrate with the police inquiry and in conjunction with signifiers such as “free conviction” and “real truth” serve as obstacles to judgment based solely on contradictory acts and the participation of all parties involved in the process.Este artigo analisa a permanência da cultura inquisitória na América Latina e o peso da mentalidade inquisitória dentro do processo penal brasileiro, especialmente na fase preliminar, que trata do núcleo principal da formação probatória utilizada pelo julgador na sentença, no intuito de responder o seguinte problema: quais os principais obstáculos no processo penal brasileiro na contemporaneidade para que haja um julgamento efetivamente em contraditório? Para tanto, avalia-se por meio de estudo de doutrinas clássicas e contemporâneas as implicações na legitimação admitida pelo processo penal brasileiro, principalmente por meio do “jogo sujo” trazido pela brecha do artigo 155 do Código de Processo Penal, que contamina o magistrado com o inquérito policial e em conjunto com significantes como “livre convencimento” e “verdade real” servem como obstáculos para que haja um julgamento fundado apenas em atos produzidos em contraditório e com a participação de todas as partes envolvidas no processo.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/31410.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.314Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020); 951-992Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2020); 951-992Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 2 (2020); 951-992Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 951-9922525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/314/228https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/314/260Copyright (c) 2020 Marcos Eugênio Vieira Meloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira2020-09-29T10:23:58Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/314Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-09-29T10:23:58Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictory Neoinquisitorialismo processual penal e a contaminação do julgador com os atos de investigação: a burla interna no processo penal brasileiro como obstáculo ao contraditório |
| title |
Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictory |
| spellingShingle |
Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictory Melo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira Criminal proceedings Inquisitive culture Contradictory Police Inquiry. Processo penal Cultura inquisitória Contraditório Inquérito policial. |
| title_short |
Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictory |
| title_full |
Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictory |
| title_fullStr |
Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictory |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictory |
| title_sort |
Criminal procedural neoinquisitorialism and the judger's contamination with the acts of investigation: the internal burla in brazilian criminal proceedings as obstacles to the contradictory |
| author |
Melo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira |
| author_facet |
Melo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, Marcos Eugênio Vieira |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Criminal proceedings Inquisitive culture Contradictory Police Inquiry. Processo penal Cultura inquisitória Contraditório Inquérito policial. |
| topic |
Criminal proceedings Inquisitive culture Contradictory Police Inquiry. Processo penal Cultura inquisitória Contraditório Inquérito policial. |
| description |
This article analyzes the permanence of the Inquisitory culture in Latin America and the weight of the Inquisitory mentality within the Brazilian criminal process, especially in the preliminary phase, which deals with the main nucleus of the probative formation used by the judge in the sentence, in order to answer the following problem: what are the main obstacles in the Brazilian criminal process today so that there is an effectively contradictory judgment? For this purpose, it is evaluated through the study of classical and contemporary criminal process doctrines the implications on the legitimacy admitted by the Brazilian criminal process, mainly through the “dirty game” brought by the breach of article 155 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which contaminates the magistrate with the police inquiry and in conjunction with signifiers such as “free conviction” and “real truth” serve as obstacles to judgment based solely on contradictory acts and the participation of all parties involved in the process. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-27 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/314 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.314 |
| url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/314 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2.314 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/314/228 https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/314/260 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Marcos Eugênio Vieira Melo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Marcos Eugênio Vieira Melo |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020); 951-992 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2020); 951-992 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 2 (2020); 951-992 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 951-992 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i2 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
| instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
| instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
| institution |
IBRASPP |
| reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
| collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
| _version_ |
1830291734776512512 |