Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodies

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. A., Ribeiro
Publication Date: 2004
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Online)
Download full: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/34830
Summary: The best serological test for leptospirosis laboratorydiagnosis remains the microscopic agglutination test (MAT).Because of the complexity of MAT, we have been developedsome rapid screening tests for leptospiral antibodies detectionin the acute phase of infection. In the decade of 80, a passivehemagglutination test employing polysaccharide fractions ofleptospires was considered appropriate for early diagnosis,but its antigen preparation included “common antigens”recognized by antibodies from 4% of healthy individuals. Anew ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) employing proteinase K resistant immunodominant antigens wasdeveloped and its potential diagnosis evaluated. Thistechnique, the PK-ELISA, presented 89.9% sensitivity and97.4% specificity, and satisfied the requeriments needed forserological screening tests of human leptospirosis. However,some of the reagents used in its antigen preparation areimported and very unstable. So, it was proposed, in a“Cooperative Research Accordance” between Instituto AdolfoLutz and Laboratório Fleury, to try new approaches withmonoclonal antibodies. Two hibridomas secreting specific monoclonal antibodies (MAb) were selected: one, against anepitope detected in 16 of 23 members of the genus Leptospira(clone A12P4) and the other, specific to the icterohaemorragiaeserogroup (clone H7P1). The MAb A12P4, a G2 (IgG2B)immunoglobulin, reacted with an epitope present in the 16-18kDa components of icterohaemorragiae serogroup and withthe 75-84 kDa components of serovars copenhageni andcanicola, after whole-cell lysates of the leptospires wereseparated by sodium dodecyl sulfate- polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis. The MAb H7P1, which is an IgG, reacted withan epitope common to several fractions of molecular weightabove 21 kDa of strain RGA and with the 21-22 kDa and the 75-82 kDa components of strain M-20. Both monoclonal antibodieswere employed in enzyme immunoassays for detecting specificantibodies in serum samples serially colleted from 52 patientswith leptospirosis, and from the control group, which consistedof sera from 57 patients with other diseases included in the tests, however, were not satisfactory. A new ELISA wasdeveloped in the present study employing an antigensuspension “AgMc”, purified by affinity chromatography withCNBr-activated Sepharose 4B coupled to the monoclonalantibodies described above. The results obtained with thistest were compared to the MAT and to the classical IgM ELISA(ELISA c). The new method, “AgMc ELISA”, presentedserological indices, relatively to reference test MAT, of 80.70% and 83.33 % of sensitivity and specificity, respectively;positive and negative predictive values of 69.70 % and 90.10%, respectively, and general agreement index of 82.49 %. So,this test was not considered a promising approach to rapiddiagnosis of human leptospirosis. Moreover, the proportionof patients diagnosed as having leptospirosis by the “AgMcELISA” and the MAT differ significantly. The possibleexplanations for the results obtained are discussed.
id IAL_0a75b9ca7e821b4b824f96db59db9529
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br:article/34830
network_acronym_str IAL
network_name_str Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodiesimmunodiagnosisleptospirosismonoclonal antibodiesThe best serological test for leptospirosis laboratorydiagnosis remains the microscopic agglutination test (MAT).Because of the complexity of MAT, we have been developedsome rapid screening tests for leptospiral antibodies detectionin the acute phase of infection. In the decade of 80, a passivehemagglutination test employing polysaccharide fractions ofleptospires was considered appropriate for early diagnosis,but its antigen preparation included “common antigens”recognized by antibodies from 4% of healthy individuals. Anew ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) employing proteinase K resistant immunodominant antigens wasdeveloped and its potential diagnosis evaluated. Thistechnique, the PK-ELISA, presented 89.9% sensitivity and97.4% specificity, and satisfied the requeriments needed forserological screening tests of human leptospirosis. However,some of the reagents used in its antigen preparation areimported and very unstable. So, it was proposed, in a“Cooperative Research Accordance” between Instituto AdolfoLutz and Laboratório Fleury, to try new approaches withmonoclonal antibodies. Two hibridomas secreting specific monoclonal antibodies (MAb) were selected: one, against anepitope detected in 16 of 23 members of the genus Leptospira(clone A12P4) and the other, specific to the icterohaemorragiaeserogroup (clone H7P1). The MAb A12P4, a G2 (IgG2B)immunoglobulin, reacted with an epitope present in the 16-18kDa components of icterohaemorragiae serogroup and withthe 75-84 kDa components of serovars copenhageni andcanicola, after whole-cell lysates of the leptospires wereseparated by sodium dodecyl sulfate- polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis. The MAb H7P1, which is an IgG, reacted withan epitope common to several fractions of molecular weightabove 21 kDa of strain RGA and with the 21-22 kDa and the 75-82 kDa components of strain M-20. Both monoclonal antibodieswere employed in enzyme immunoassays for detecting specificantibodies in serum samples serially colleted from 52 patientswith leptospirosis, and from the control group, which consistedof sera from 57 patients with other diseases included in the tests, however, were not satisfactory. A new ELISA wasdeveloped in the present study employing an antigensuspension “AgMc”, purified by affinity chromatography withCNBr-activated Sepharose 4B coupled to the monoclonalantibodies described above. The results obtained with thistest were compared to the MAT and to the classical IgM ELISA(ELISA c). The new method, “AgMc ELISA”, presentedserological indices, relatively to reference test MAT, of 80.70% and 83.33 % of sensitivity and specificity, respectively;positive and negative predictive values of 69.70 % and 90.10%, respectively, and general agreement index of 82.49 %. So,this test was not considered a promising approach to rapiddiagnosis of human leptospirosis. Moreover, the proportionof patients diagnosed as having leptospirosis by the “AgMcELISA” and the MAT differ significantly. The possibleexplanations for the results obtained are discussed.Instituto Adolfo Lutz2004-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/34830Instituto Adolfo Lutz Journal - RIAL; Vol. 63 No. 1 (2004); 126-127Revista del Instituto Adolfo Lutz - RIAL; Vol. 63 Núm. 1 (2004); 126-127Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz; v. 63 n. 1 (2004); 126-1271983-38140073-985510.18241/rial.v63i1reponame:Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Online)instname:Instituto Adolfo Lutzinstacron:IALenghttps://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/34830/33338Copyright (c) 2004 Ribeiro, M. A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessM. A., Ribeiro, 2024-03-08T13:37:03Zoai:ojs.periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br:article/34830Revistahttps://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/oairial@saude.sp.gov.brhttps://doi.org/10.53393/rial1983-38140073-9855opendoar:2024-03-08T13:37:03Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Online) - Instituto Adolfo Lutzfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodies
title Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodies
spellingShingle Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodies
M. A., Ribeiro,
immunodiagnosis
leptospirosis
monoclonal antibodies
title_short Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodies
title_full Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodies
title_fullStr Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodies
title_full_unstemmed Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodies
title_sort Contribution to the immunodiagnosis of human leptospirosis: emphasis to monoclonal antibodies
author M. A., Ribeiro,
author_facet M. A., Ribeiro,
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv M. A., Ribeiro,
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv immunodiagnosis
leptospirosis
monoclonal antibodies
topic immunodiagnosis
leptospirosis
monoclonal antibodies
description The best serological test for leptospirosis laboratorydiagnosis remains the microscopic agglutination test (MAT).Because of the complexity of MAT, we have been developedsome rapid screening tests for leptospiral antibodies detectionin the acute phase of infection. In the decade of 80, a passivehemagglutination test employing polysaccharide fractions ofleptospires was considered appropriate for early diagnosis,but its antigen preparation included “common antigens”recognized by antibodies from 4% of healthy individuals. Anew ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) employing proteinase K resistant immunodominant antigens wasdeveloped and its potential diagnosis evaluated. Thistechnique, the PK-ELISA, presented 89.9% sensitivity and97.4% specificity, and satisfied the requeriments needed forserological screening tests of human leptospirosis. However,some of the reagents used in its antigen preparation areimported and very unstable. So, it was proposed, in a“Cooperative Research Accordance” between Instituto AdolfoLutz and Laboratório Fleury, to try new approaches withmonoclonal antibodies. Two hibridomas secreting specific monoclonal antibodies (MAb) were selected: one, against anepitope detected in 16 of 23 members of the genus Leptospira(clone A12P4) and the other, specific to the icterohaemorragiaeserogroup (clone H7P1). The MAb A12P4, a G2 (IgG2B)immunoglobulin, reacted with an epitope present in the 16-18kDa components of icterohaemorragiae serogroup and withthe 75-84 kDa components of serovars copenhageni andcanicola, after whole-cell lysates of the leptospires wereseparated by sodium dodecyl sulfate- polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis. The MAb H7P1, which is an IgG, reacted withan epitope common to several fractions of molecular weightabove 21 kDa of strain RGA and with the 21-22 kDa and the 75-82 kDa components of strain M-20. Both monoclonal antibodieswere employed in enzyme immunoassays for detecting specificantibodies in serum samples serially colleted from 52 patientswith leptospirosis, and from the control group, which consistedof sera from 57 patients with other diseases included in the tests, however, were not satisfactory. A new ELISA wasdeveloped in the present study employing an antigensuspension “AgMc”, purified by affinity chromatography withCNBr-activated Sepharose 4B coupled to the monoclonalantibodies described above. The results obtained with thistest were compared to the MAT and to the classical IgM ELISA(ELISA c). The new method, “AgMc ELISA”, presentedserological indices, relatively to reference test MAT, of 80.70% and 83.33 % of sensitivity and specificity, respectively;positive and negative predictive values of 69.70 % and 90.10%, respectively, and general agreement index of 82.49 %. So,this test was not considered a promising approach to rapiddiagnosis of human leptospirosis. Moreover, the proportionof patients diagnosed as having leptospirosis by the “AgMcELISA” and the MAT differ significantly. The possibleexplanations for the results obtained are discussed.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/34830
url https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/34830
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/34830/33338
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2004 Ribeiro, M. A.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2004 Ribeiro, M. A.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Adolfo Lutz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Adolfo Lutz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Adolfo Lutz Journal - RIAL; Vol. 63 No. 1 (2004); 126-127
Revista del Instituto Adolfo Lutz - RIAL; Vol. 63 Núm. 1 (2004); 126-127
Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz; v. 63 n. 1 (2004); 126-127
1983-3814
0073-9855
10.18241/rial.v63i1
reponame:Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Online)
instname:Instituto Adolfo Lutz
instacron:IAL
instname_str Instituto Adolfo Lutz
instacron_str IAL
institution IAL
reponame_str Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Online)
collection Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Online) - Instituto Adolfo Lutz
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rial@saude.sp.gov.br
_version_ 1836991962104725504