Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fingstag,Maiquiel Diego
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Casa,Ricardo Trezzi, Bogo,Amauri, Kuhnem,Paulo, Sangoi,Luis, Valente,Juliana Borba, Bevilaqua,Diego, Fiorentin,Otávio Ajala, Gonçalves,Mayra Juline
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Summa phytopathologica (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000300265
Summary: ABSTRACT Gibberella ear rot (GER) in maize, caused by Fusarium graminearum species complex, is a destructive disease in southern Brazil and worldwide. Five field-experiments were conducted to determine fungicide efficacy, grain yield and grain quality (study I), as well as response of increasing rates (study II) on GER control, grain yield (GY) and grain damage (GD) in maize during the 2014/15 and 2015/16 growing seasons. Fungicides were sprayed 48 h before (preventive action) or 48 h after (curative action) inoculation of two Fusarium meridionale isolates (PR and MG). Study I consisted in applying nine active ingredients (metconazole, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, trifloxystrobin, prothioconazole, thiophanate-methyl, azoxystrobin, cyproconazole and carbendazim) present in eight commercial formulations at two sowing dates. Study II consisted in applying increasing rates of three fungicides evaluated at three sowing dates using only PR isolate. In study I, no differences were observed among fungicides when the variables GER, GY and GD were analyzed together. There were interactions between time of fungicide application and F. meridionale isolates when GER severity and GY were considered. Preventive fungicide application at different sowing dates and the use of MG isolate reduced GER by 11.6% and increased GY by 5.3%, compared to curative application. In study II, there was a significant interaction between fungicides and application time for GER, GY and GD. Preventive application of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), pyraclostrobin + metconazole (0.19 + 0.12 and 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1) and carbendazim (2 L ha-1) reduced GER by 41 and 50%, 47 and 54%, and 54% at the three sowing dates, respectively. There was an increment of 45.7% and 46.8% in GY when trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), respectively, were preventively sprayed at the three sowing dates, compared to the control treatment. Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.
id GPF-1_4b60ba45e945e80713359aa73e0563a1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-54052019000300265
network_acronym_str GPF-1
network_name_str Summa phytopathologica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maizeZea maysFusarium graminearumchemical controlABSTRACT Gibberella ear rot (GER) in maize, caused by Fusarium graminearum species complex, is a destructive disease in southern Brazil and worldwide. Five field-experiments were conducted to determine fungicide efficacy, grain yield and grain quality (study I), as well as response of increasing rates (study II) on GER control, grain yield (GY) and grain damage (GD) in maize during the 2014/15 and 2015/16 growing seasons. Fungicides were sprayed 48 h before (preventive action) or 48 h after (curative action) inoculation of two Fusarium meridionale isolates (PR and MG). Study I consisted in applying nine active ingredients (metconazole, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, trifloxystrobin, prothioconazole, thiophanate-methyl, azoxystrobin, cyproconazole and carbendazim) present in eight commercial formulations at two sowing dates. Study II consisted in applying increasing rates of three fungicides evaluated at three sowing dates using only PR isolate. In study I, no differences were observed among fungicides when the variables GER, GY and GD were analyzed together. There were interactions between time of fungicide application and F. meridionale isolates when GER severity and GY were considered. Preventive fungicide application at different sowing dates and the use of MG isolate reduced GER by 11.6% and increased GY by 5.3%, compared to curative application. In study II, there was a significant interaction between fungicides and application time for GER, GY and GD. Preventive application of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), pyraclostrobin + metconazole (0.19 + 0.12 and 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1) and carbendazim (2 L ha-1) reduced GER by 41 and 50%, 47 and 54%, and 54% at the three sowing dates, respectively. There was an increment of 45.7% and 46.8% in GY when trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), respectively, were preventively sprayed at the three sowing dates, compared to the control treatment. Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000300265Summa Phytopathologica v.45 n.3 2019reponame:Summa phytopathologica (Online)instname:Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologiainstacron:GPF10.1590/0100-5405/193255info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFingstag,Maiquiel DiegoCasa,Ricardo TrezziBogo,AmauriKuhnem,PauloSangoi,LuisValente,Juliana BorbaBevilaqua,DiegoFiorentin,Otávio AjalaGonçalves,Mayra Julineeng2019-10-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-54052019000300265Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/sphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsumma@fca.unesp.br1980-54540100-5405opendoar:2019-10-09T00:00Summa phytopathologica (Online) - Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize
title Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize
spellingShingle Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize
Fingstag,Maiquiel Diego
Zea mays
Fusarium graminearum
chemical control
title_short Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize
title_full Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize
title_fullStr Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize
title_full_unstemmed Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize
title_sort Fungicide performance on Fusarium meridionale control, grain yield and grain damage in maize
author Fingstag,Maiquiel Diego
author_facet Fingstag,Maiquiel Diego
Casa,Ricardo Trezzi
Bogo,Amauri
Kuhnem,Paulo
Sangoi,Luis
Valente,Juliana Borba
Bevilaqua,Diego
Fiorentin,Otávio Ajala
Gonçalves,Mayra Juline
author_role author
author2 Casa,Ricardo Trezzi
Bogo,Amauri
Kuhnem,Paulo
Sangoi,Luis
Valente,Juliana Borba
Bevilaqua,Diego
Fiorentin,Otávio Ajala
Gonçalves,Mayra Juline
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fingstag,Maiquiel Diego
Casa,Ricardo Trezzi
Bogo,Amauri
Kuhnem,Paulo
Sangoi,Luis
Valente,Juliana Borba
Bevilaqua,Diego
Fiorentin,Otávio Ajala
Gonçalves,Mayra Juline
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays
Fusarium graminearum
chemical control
topic Zea mays
Fusarium graminearum
chemical control
description ABSTRACT Gibberella ear rot (GER) in maize, caused by Fusarium graminearum species complex, is a destructive disease in southern Brazil and worldwide. Five field-experiments were conducted to determine fungicide efficacy, grain yield and grain quality (study I), as well as response of increasing rates (study II) on GER control, grain yield (GY) and grain damage (GD) in maize during the 2014/15 and 2015/16 growing seasons. Fungicides were sprayed 48 h before (preventive action) or 48 h after (curative action) inoculation of two Fusarium meridionale isolates (PR and MG). Study I consisted in applying nine active ingredients (metconazole, pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole, trifloxystrobin, prothioconazole, thiophanate-methyl, azoxystrobin, cyproconazole and carbendazim) present in eight commercial formulations at two sowing dates. Study II consisted in applying increasing rates of three fungicides evaluated at three sowing dates using only PR isolate. In study I, no differences were observed among fungicides when the variables GER, GY and GD were analyzed together. There were interactions between time of fungicide application and F. meridionale isolates when GER severity and GY were considered. Preventive fungicide application at different sowing dates and the use of MG isolate reduced GER by 11.6% and increased GY by 5.3%, compared to curative application. In study II, there was a significant interaction between fungicides and application time for GER, GY and GD. Preventive application of trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), pyraclostrobin + metconazole (0.19 + 0.12 and 0.29 + 0.18 L ha-1) and carbendazim (2 L ha-1) reduced GER by 41 and 50%, 47 and 54%, and 54% at the three sowing dates, respectively. There was an increment of 45.7% and 46.8% in GY when trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (0.15 + 0.17 and 0.22 + 0.26 L ha-1), respectively, were preventively sprayed at the three sowing dates, compared to the control treatment. Trifloxystrobin + prothiocanazole, pyraclostrobin + metconazole and carbendazim (1.0 and 2.0 L ha-1) preventively sprayed at two rates reduced GD incidence by 53.5 and 48.7%, 47.7 and 57.5%, 48.1 and 50.5%, respectively, for each fungicide and rate, and could be incorporated into a disease management program.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000300265
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-54052019000300265
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-5405/193255
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Summa Phytopathologica v.45 n.3 2019
reponame:Summa phytopathologica (Online)
instname:Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
instacron:GPF
instname_str Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
instacron_str GPF
institution GPF
reponame_str Summa phytopathologica (Online)
collection Summa phytopathologica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Summa phytopathologica (Online) - Grupo Paulista de Fitopatologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv summa@fca.unesp.br
_version_ 1754193419627921408