Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sen,Ozgur Genc
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Bilgin,Burcu, Koçak,Sibel, Sağlam,Baran Can, Koçak,Mustafa Murat
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Brazilian Dental Journal
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000300245
Summary: Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the amount of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using ProTaper Next (PTN), Twisted File (TF) Adaptive, and Reciproc instruments. Forty-five extracted human maxillary canines were selected and randomly assigned into 3 groups. The root canals were prepared using PTN instruments with continuous rotation (n=15), TF Adaptive instruments with adaptive motion (n=15), Reciproc instruments with reciprocating motion (n=15). During the preparations, canals were irrigated using distilled water and material extruded apically was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. After a 5-day drying period in an incubator, the tubes were weighed and the dry weight of the extruded debris was calculated. Data distributions were assessed via the Shapiro-Wilk test, and groups were compared via the Kruskal-Wallis test. The greatest amount of debris extruded by TF Adaptive and the least by PTN, but the difference was insignificant between groups (p=0.259). All instrumentation systems were associated with debris extrusion.
id FUNORP-1_e970e10e5ff0978c4bb5240b31415d1c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402018000300245
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motionapical extrusioncanal preparationmotion kinematics.Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the amount of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using ProTaper Next (PTN), Twisted File (TF) Adaptive, and Reciproc instruments. Forty-five extracted human maxillary canines were selected and randomly assigned into 3 groups. The root canals were prepared using PTN instruments with continuous rotation (n=15), TF Adaptive instruments with adaptive motion (n=15), Reciproc instruments with reciprocating motion (n=15). During the preparations, canals were irrigated using distilled water and material extruded apically was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. After a 5-day drying period in an incubator, the tubes were weighed and the dry weight of the extruded debris was calculated. Data distributions were assessed via the Shapiro-Wilk test, and groups were compared via the Kruskal-Wallis test. The greatest amount of debris extruded by TF Adaptive and the least by PTN, but the difference was insignificant between groups (p=0.259). All instrumentation systems were associated with debris extrusion.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2018-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000300245Brazilian Dental Journal v.29 n.3 2018reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201801967info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSen,Ozgur GencBilgin,BurcuKoçak,SibelSağlam,Baran CanKoçak,Mustafa Murateng2018-06-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402018000300245Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2018-06-28T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion
title Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion
spellingShingle Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion
Sen,Ozgur Genc
apical extrusion
canal preparation
motion kinematics.
title_short Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion
title_full Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion
title_fullStr Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion
title_sort Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion
author Sen,Ozgur Genc
author_facet Sen,Ozgur Genc
Bilgin,Burcu
Koçak,Sibel
Sağlam,Baran Can
Koçak,Mustafa Murat
author_role author
author2 Bilgin,Burcu
Koçak,Sibel
Sağlam,Baran Can
Koçak,Mustafa Murat
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sen,Ozgur Genc
Bilgin,Burcu
Koçak,Sibel
Sağlam,Baran Can
Koçak,Mustafa Murat
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv apical extrusion
canal preparation
motion kinematics.
topic apical extrusion
canal preparation
motion kinematics.
description Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the amount of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using ProTaper Next (PTN), Twisted File (TF) Adaptive, and Reciproc instruments. Forty-five extracted human maxillary canines were selected and randomly assigned into 3 groups. The root canals were prepared using PTN instruments with continuous rotation (n=15), TF Adaptive instruments with adaptive motion (n=15), Reciproc instruments with reciprocating motion (n=15). During the preparations, canals were irrigated using distilled water and material extruded apically was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. After a 5-day drying period in an incubator, the tubes were weighed and the dry weight of the extruded debris was calculated. Data distributions were assessed via the Shapiro-Wilk test, and groups were compared via the Kruskal-Wallis test. The greatest amount of debris extruded by TF Adaptive and the least by PTN, but the difference was insignificant between groups (p=0.259). All instrumentation systems were associated with debris extrusion.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000300245
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000300245
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201801967
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.29 n.3 2018
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204095227363328