What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Person, Osmar Clayton
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Angélico Junior, Fernando Veiga, Altoé, Jacqueline, Portes, Leonardo Marinho, Lopes, Paula Ribeiro, Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: ABCS Health Sciences (Online)
Download full: https://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565
Summary: Introduction: Tinnitus is a sound perception not related to stimulation. It can significantly impair the quality of life and its treatment is considered one significant challenge of Medicine. Objective: To evaluate systematic reviews developed by Cochrane regarding therapeutic interventions for subjective tinnitus. Methods: It is an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. We searched systematic reviews on Cochrane Library. The MeSH term "tinnitus" was used for searches. Inclusion criteria involved therapeutic interventions for patients with subjective tinnitus. Results: The search strategy recovered 577 citations with 14  Cochrane systematic reviews. 13 were included because they were focusing on primary tinnitus interventions. One review had no scope of analysis for tinnitus and it was excluded. 7,998 tinnitus patients were evaluated. Conclusion: There is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of any intervention for tinnitus treatment, considering the studies performed so far and compiled in Cochrane systematic reviews.
id FMABC_b0d4bcf4b726255bc38fabbc09ad1bd8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1565
network_acronym_str FMABC
network_name_str ABCS Health Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?O que revisões sistemáticas Cochrane dizem sobre terapêutica para zumbido?tinnitustherapeuticssystematic reviewevidence-based medicinezumbidoterapêuticarevisão sistemáticamedicina baseada em evidênciasIntroduction: Tinnitus is a sound perception not related to stimulation. It can significantly impair the quality of life and its treatment is considered one significant challenge of Medicine. Objective: To evaluate systematic reviews developed by Cochrane regarding therapeutic interventions for subjective tinnitus. Methods: It is an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. We searched systematic reviews on Cochrane Library. The MeSH term "tinnitus" was used for searches. Inclusion criteria involved therapeutic interventions for patients with subjective tinnitus. Results: The search strategy recovered 577 citations with 14  Cochrane systematic reviews. 13 were included because they were focusing on primary tinnitus interventions. One review had no scope of analysis for tinnitus and it was excluded. 7,998 tinnitus patients were evaluated. Conclusion: There is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of any intervention for tinnitus treatment, considering the studies performed so far and compiled in Cochrane systematic reviews.Introdução: O zumbido é a sensação do som sem que haja estimulação ambiental. Pode prejudicar significativamente a qualidade de vida e seu tratamento é considerado um grande desafio da Medicina. Objetivo: Avaliar as revisões sistemáticas desenvolvidas pela Cochrane, no que concerne às intervenções terapêuticas para o zumbido subjetivo. Métodos: Trata-se de overview de revisões sistemáticas Cochrane. Procedeu-se à busca por revisões sistemáticas na Cochrane Library. Foi utilizado o termo DeCS “zumbido”. Os critérios de inclusão envolveram intervenções terapêuticas para pacientes com zumbido subjetivo. Resultados: A estratégia de busca recuperou 577 citações e, destas, 14 revisões sistemáticas Cochrane, sendo que 13 enfocavam intervenções primárias para zumbido, sendo estas incluídas neste estudo. Uma revisão não tinha escopo de análise para zumbido e foi excluída. Foram avaliados 7.998 portadores de zumbido. Conclusão: Há carência de evidência de efetividade de qualquer intervenção, medicamentosa ou não, para tratamento do zumbido, considerando os estudos realizados até o momento e compilados em revisões sistemáticas Cochrane.Núcleo de Estudos, Pesquisa e Assessoria à Saúde (NEPAS)2022-02-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/156510.7322/abcshs.2020111.1565ABCS Health Sciences; Vol. 47 (2022); e022301ABCS Health Sciences; v. 47 (2022); e0223012357-81142318-4965reponame:ABCS Health Sciences (Online)instname:Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC)instacron:FMABCenghttps://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565/1206Copyright (c) 2022 Person et al.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPerson, Osmar ClaytonAngélico Junior, Fernando VeigaAltoé, JacquelinePortes, Leonardo MarinhoLopes, Paula RibeiroPuga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos2022-10-26T06:24:34Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1565Revistahttp://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshsPUBhttp://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/oairicardo.souto@fmabc.br2357-81142318-4965opendoar:2022-10-26T06:24:34ABCS Health Sciences (Online) - Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?
O que revisões sistemáticas Cochrane dizem sobre terapêutica para zumbido?
title What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?
spellingShingle What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?
Person, Osmar Clayton
tinnitus
therapeutics
systematic review
evidence-based medicine
zumbido
terapêutica
revisão sistemática
medicina baseada em evidências
title_short What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?
title_full What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?
title_fullStr What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?
title_full_unstemmed What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?
title_sort What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?
author Person, Osmar Clayton
author_facet Person, Osmar Clayton
Angélico Junior, Fernando Veiga
Altoé, Jacqueline
Portes, Leonardo Marinho
Lopes, Paula Ribeiro
Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos
author_role author
author2 Angélico Junior, Fernando Veiga
Altoé, Jacqueline
Portes, Leonardo Marinho
Lopes, Paula Ribeiro
Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Person, Osmar Clayton
Angélico Junior, Fernando Veiga
Altoé, Jacqueline
Portes, Leonardo Marinho
Lopes, Paula Ribeiro
Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv tinnitus
therapeutics
systematic review
evidence-based medicine
zumbido
terapêutica
revisão sistemática
medicina baseada em evidências
topic tinnitus
therapeutics
systematic review
evidence-based medicine
zumbido
terapêutica
revisão sistemática
medicina baseada em evidências
description Introduction: Tinnitus is a sound perception not related to stimulation. It can significantly impair the quality of life and its treatment is considered one significant challenge of Medicine. Objective: To evaluate systematic reviews developed by Cochrane regarding therapeutic interventions for subjective tinnitus. Methods: It is an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. We searched systematic reviews on Cochrane Library. The MeSH term "tinnitus" was used for searches. Inclusion criteria involved therapeutic interventions for patients with subjective tinnitus. Results: The search strategy recovered 577 citations with 14  Cochrane systematic reviews. 13 were included because they were focusing on primary tinnitus interventions. One review had no scope of analysis for tinnitus and it was excluded. 7,998 tinnitus patients were evaluated. Conclusion: There is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of any intervention for tinnitus treatment, considering the studies performed so far and compiled in Cochrane systematic reviews.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565
10.7322/abcshs.2020111.1565
url https://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565
identifier_str_mv 10.7322/abcshs.2020111.1565
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565/1206
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Person et al.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Person et al.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Estudos, Pesquisa e Assessoria à Saúde (NEPAS)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Estudos, Pesquisa e Assessoria à Saúde (NEPAS)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ABCS Health Sciences; Vol. 47 (2022); e022301
ABCS Health Sciences; v. 47 (2022); e022301
2357-8114
2318-4965
reponame:ABCS Health Sciences (Online)
instname:Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC)
instacron:FMABC
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC)
instacron_str FMABC
institution FMABC
reponame_str ABCS Health Sciences (Online)
collection ABCS Health Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv ABCS Health Sciences (Online) - Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ricardo.souto@fmabc.br
_version_ 1836732275563167744