What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2022 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | ABCS Health Sciences (Online) |
Download full: | https://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565 |
Summary: | Introduction: Tinnitus is a sound perception not related to stimulation. It can significantly impair the quality of life and its treatment is considered one significant challenge of Medicine. Objective: To evaluate systematic reviews developed by Cochrane regarding therapeutic interventions for subjective tinnitus. Methods: It is an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. We searched systematic reviews on Cochrane Library. The MeSH term "tinnitus" was used for searches. Inclusion criteria involved therapeutic interventions for patients with subjective tinnitus. Results: The search strategy recovered 577 citations with 14 Cochrane systematic reviews. 13 were included because they were focusing on primary tinnitus interventions. One review had no scope of analysis for tinnitus and it was excluded. 7,998 tinnitus patients were evaluated. Conclusion: There is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of any intervention for tinnitus treatment, considering the studies performed so far and compiled in Cochrane systematic reviews. |
id |
FMABC_b0d4bcf4b726255bc38fabbc09ad1bd8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1565 |
network_acronym_str |
FMABC |
network_name_str |
ABCS Health Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions?O que revisões sistemáticas Cochrane dizem sobre terapêutica para zumbido?tinnitustherapeuticssystematic reviewevidence-based medicinezumbidoterapêuticarevisão sistemáticamedicina baseada em evidênciasIntroduction: Tinnitus is a sound perception not related to stimulation. It can significantly impair the quality of life and its treatment is considered one significant challenge of Medicine. Objective: To evaluate systematic reviews developed by Cochrane regarding therapeutic interventions for subjective tinnitus. Methods: It is an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. We searched systematic reviews on Cochrane Library. The MeSH term "tinnitus" was used for searches. Inclusion criteria involved therapeutic interventions for patients with subjective tinnitus. Results: The search strategy recovered 577 citations with 14 Cochrane systematic reviews. 13 were included because they were focusing on primary tinnitus interventions. One review had no scope of analysis for tinnitus and it was excluded. 7,998 tinnitus patients were evaluated. Conclusion: There is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of any intervention for tinnitus treatment, considering the studies performed so far and compiled in Cochrane systematic reviews.Introdução: O zumbido é a sensação do som sem que haja estimulação ambiental. Pode prejudicar significativamente a qualidade de vida e seu tratamento é considerado um grande desafio da Medicina. Objetivo: Avaliar as revisões sistemáticas desenvolvidas pela Cochrane, no que concerne às intervenções terapêuticas para o zumbido subjetivo. Métodos: Trata-se de overview de revisões sistemáticas Cochrane. Procedeu-se à busca por revisões sistemáticas na Cochrane Library. Foi utilizado o termo DeCS “zumbido”. Os critérios de inclusão envolveram intervenções terapêuticas para pacientes com zumbido subjetivo. Resultados: A estratégia de busca recuperou 577 citações e, destas, 14 revisões sistemáticas Cochrane, sendo que 13 enfocavam intervenções primárias para zumbido, sendo estas incluídas neste estudo. Uma revisão não tinha escopo de análise para zumbido e foi excluída. Foram avaliados 7.998 portadores de zumbido. Conclusão: Há carência de evidência de efetividade de qualquer intervenção, medicamentosa ou não, para tratamento do zumbido, considerando os estudos realizados até o momento e compilados em revisões sistemáticas Cochrane.Núcleo de Estudos, Pesquisa e Assessoria à Saúde (NEPAS)2022-02-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/156510.7322/abcshs.2020111.1565ABCS Health Sciences; Vol. 47 (2022); e022301ABCS Health Sciences; v. 47 (2022); e0223012357-81142318-4965reponame:ABCS Health Sciences (Online)instname:Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC)instacron:FMABCenghttps://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565/1206Copyright (c) 2022 Person et al.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPerson, Osmar ClaytonAngélico Junior, Fernando VeigaAltoé, JacquelinePortes, Leonardo MarinhoLopes, Paula RibeiroPuga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos2022-10-26T06:24:34Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1565Revistahttp://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshsPUBhttp://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/oairicardo.souto@fmabc.br2357-81142318-4965opendoar:2022-10-26T06:24:34ABCS Health Sciences (Online) - Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions? O que revisões sistemáticas Cochrane dizem sobre terapêutica para zumbido? |
title |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions? |
spellingShingle |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions? Person, Osmar Clayton tinnitus therapeutics systematic review evidence-based medicine zumbido terapêutica revisão sistemática medicina baseada em evidências |
title_short |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions? |
title_full |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions? |
title_fullStr |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions? |
title_sort |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about therapeutic tinnitus interventions? |
author |
Person, Osmar Clayton |
author_facet |
Person, Osmar Clayton Angélico Junior, Fernando Veiga Altoé, Jacqueline Portes, Leonardo Marinho Lopes, Paula Ribeiro Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Angélico Junior, Fernando Veiga Altoé, Jacqueline Portes, Leonardo Marinho Lopes, Paula Ribeiro Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Person, Osmar Clayton Angélico Junior, Fernando Veiga Altoé, Jacqueline Portes, Leonardo Marinho Lopes, Paula Ribeiro Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
tinnitus therapeutics systematic review evidence-based medicine zumbido terapêutica revisão sistemática medicina baseada em evidências |
topic |
tinnitus therapeutics systematic review evidence-based medicine zumbido terapêutica revisão sistemática medicina baseada em evidências |
description |
Introduction: Tinnitus is a sound perception not related to stimulation. It can significantly impair the quality of life and its treatment is considered one significant challenge of Medicine. Objective: To evaluate systematic reviews developed by Cochrane regarding therapeutic interventions for subjective tinnitus. Methods: It is an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. We searched systematic reviews on Cochrane Library. The MeSH term "tinnitus" was used for searches. Inclusion criteria involved therapeutic interventions for patients with subjective tinnitus. Results: The search strategy recovered 577 citations with 14 Cochrane systematic reviews. 13 were included because they were focusing on primary tinnitus interventions. One review had no scope of analysis for tinnitus and it was excluded. 7,998 tinnitus patients were evaluated. Conclusion: There is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of any intervention for tinnitus treatment, considering the studies performed so far and compiled in Cochrane systematic reviews. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565 10.7322/abcshs.2020111.1565 |
url |
https://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.7322/abcshs.2020111.1565 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1565/1206 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Person et al. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Person et al. |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Estudos, Pesquisa e Assessoria à Saúde (NEPAS) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Estudos, Pesquisa e Assessoria à Saúde (NEPAS) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ABCS Health Sciences; Vol. 47 (2022); e022301 ABCS Health Sciences; v. 47 (2022); e022301 2357-8114 2318-4965 reponame:ABCS Health Sciences (Online) instname:Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC) instacron:FMABC |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC) |
instacron_str |
FMABC |
institution |
FMABC |
reponame_str |
ABCS Health Sciences (Online) |
collection |
ABCS Health Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
ABCS Health Sciences (Online) - Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ricardo.souto@fmabc.br |
_version_ |
1836732275563167744 |