Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2017 |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
DOI: | 10.1590/1807-7692bar2017170050 |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25187 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040718610&doi=10.1590%2f1807-7692bar2017170050&partnerID=40&md5=65a67941eb7a87a76aee906171154a14 |
Summary: | Executive coaching is a common leadership development intervention whose complexity is underestimated. The triangular relationships between coachee, coach, and organization give rise to conflicting interests (Fatien-Diochon, 2012). This study examines how coaches perceive triangular relationships and reflect on conflicts of interest and ethical issues. During semi-structured interviews, nine coaches drew their interpretations of how triangular relationships unfold in executive coaching processes. Coaches’ explanations were categorized into three groups. There are coaches who understand executive coaching as a harmonious and congruent process, called naïve; some coaches rely on the coaching process to deal with conflicts of interest, and we called them procedural. Other coaches are skeptical when dealing with conflict of interests in triangular relationships, and were called suspicious. In order to support coaches facing ethical dilemmas that may be present in triangular relationships in the executive coaching process, the ethics of the profession perspective developed for the educational sector by Shapiro and Stefkovich (2016) was adapted and integrated into Carroll and Shaw’s (2013) ethical maturity perspective. This adapted model offers coaches an integrative and dynamic view to foster their development and ethical maturity. © 2017, ANPAD - Associacao Nacional de Pos-Graduacao e Pesquisa em Administracao. All rights reserved. |
id |
FGV_1461f43ac8fa1d25c866621f31f77d0d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/25187 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
repository_id_str |
3974 |
spelling |
Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva VieiraEscolas::EAESPFGV2018-10-25T18:23:22Z2018-10-25T18:23:22Z20171807-7692http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25187https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040718610&doi=10.1590%2f1807-7692bar2017170050&partnerID=40&md5=65a67941eb7a87a76aee906171154a1410.1590/1807-7692bar20171700502-s2.0-85040718610Executive coaching is a common leadership development intervention whose complexity is underestimated. The triangular relationships between coachee, coach, and organization give rise to conflicting interests (Fatien-Diochon, 2012). This study examines how coaches perceive triangular relationships and reflect on conflicts of interest and ethical issues. During semi-structured interviews, nine coaches drew their interpretations of how triangular relationships unfold in executive coaching processes. Coaches’ explanations were categorized into three groups. There are coaches who understand executive coaching as a harmonious and congruent process, called naïve; some coaches rely on the coaching process to deal with conflicts of interest, and we called them procedural. Other coaches are skeptical when dealing with conflict of interests in triangular relationships, and were called suspicious. In order to support coaches facing ethical dilemmas that may be present in triangular relationships in the executive coaching process, the ethics of the profession perspective developed for the educational sector by Shapiro and Stefkovich (2016) was adapted and integrated into Carroll and Shaw’s (2013) ethical maturity perspective. This adapted model offers coaches an integrative and dynamic view to foster their development and ethical maturity. © 2017, ANPAD - Associacao Nacional de Pos-Graduacao e Pesquisa em Administracao. All rights reserved.engANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em AdministraçãoBAR - Brazilian Administration ReviewScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVEthical maturityExecutive coachingSocial constructionismTriangular relationshipAssessoria empresarialConstrucionismo socialCapacitação de empregadosDrawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coachingArticle (Journal/Review)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTEXT2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf.txt2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain79854https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/df2f3d9d-4f1d-4001-aade-27d3913a6e98/download227b89c8ab7ded395ca2a623dbef1d62MD54ORIGINAL2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf2-s2.0-85040718610.pdfapplication/pdf692155https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/bdd5fdcb-ae9b-4243-8b43-e1cdbf4f9748/download9ad3b2c18b54242092b7de1c87db7ab6MD51THUMBNAIL2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf.jpg2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3369https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/3ccfdcd6-814d-461e-b25a-07de772cd7cd/downloaddeee02b9fd5f1db77a91b41d9d289f85MD5510438/251872023-11-28 10:43:12.087open.accessoai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/25187https://repositorio.fgv.brRepositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace-oai/requestopendoar:39742023-11-28T10:43:12Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching |
title |
Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching |
spellingShingle |
Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira Ethical maturity Executive coaching Social constructionism Triangular relationship Assessoria empresarial Construcionismo social Capacitação de empregados |
title_short |
Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching |
title_full |
Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching |
title_fullStr |
Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching |
title_full_unstemmed |
Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching |
title_sort |
Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching |
author |
Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira |
author_facet |
Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.unidadefgv.por.fl_str_mv |
Escolas::EAESP |
dc.contributor.affiliation.none.fl_str_mv |
FGV |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Ethical maturity Executive coaching Social constructionism Triangular relationship |
topic |
Ethical maturity Executive coaching Social constructionism Triangular relationship Assessoria empresarial Construcionismo social Capacitação de empregados |
dc.subject.bibliodata.por.fl_str_mv |
Assessoria empresarial Construcionismo social Capacitação de empregados |
description |
Executive coaching is a common leadership development intervention whose complexity is underestimated. The triangular relationships between coachee, coach, and organization give rise to conflicting interests (Fatien-Diochon, 2012). This study examines how coaches perceive triangular relationships and reflect on conflicts of interest and ethical issues. During semi-structured interviews, nine coaches drew their interpretations of how triangular relationships unfold in executive coaching processes. Coaches’ explanations were categorized into three groups. There are coaches who understand executive coaching as a harmonious and congruent process, called naïve; some coaches rely on the coaching process to deal with conflicts of interest, and we called them procedural. Other coaches are skeptical when dealing with conflict of interests in triangular relationships, and were called suspicious. In order to support coaches facing ethical dilemmas that may be present in triangular relationships in the executive coaching process, the ethics of the profession perspective developed for the educational sector by Shapiro and Stefkovich (2016) was adapted and integrated into Carroll and Shaw’s (2013) ethical maturity perspective. This adapted model offers coaches an integrative and dynamic view to foster their development and ethical maturity. © 2017, ANPAD - Associacao Nacional de Pos-Graduacao e Pesquisa em Administracao. All rights reserved. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-25T18:23:22Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-25T18:23:22Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Article (Journal/Review) |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25187 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040718610&doi=10.1590%2f1807-7692bar2017170050&partnerID=40&md5=65a67941eb7a87a76aee906171154a14 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1807-7692 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-7692bar2017170050 |
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85040718610 |
identifier_str_mv |
1807-7692 10.1590/1807-7692bar2017170050 2-s2.0-85040718610 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25187 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040718610&doi=10.1590%2f1807-7692bar2017170050&partnerID=40&md5=65a67941eb7a87a76aee906171154a14 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartofseries.eng.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/df2f3d9d-4f1d-4001-aade-27d3913a6e98/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/bdd5fdcb-ae9b-4243-8b43-e1cdbf4f9748/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/3ccfdcd6-814d-461e-b25a-07de772cd7cd/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
227b89c8ab7ded395ca2a623dbef1d62 9ad3b2c18b54242092b7de1c87db7ab6 deee02b9fd5f1db77a91b41d9d289f85 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1827846644076380160 |