Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira
Publication Date: 2017
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
DOI: 10.1590/1807-7692bar2017170050
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25187
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040718610&doi=10.1590%2f1807-7692bar2017170050&partnerID=40&md5=65a67941eb7a87a76aee906171154a14
Summary: Executive coaching is a common leadership development intervention whose complexity is underestimated. The triangular relationships between coachee, coach, and organization give rise to conflicting interests (Fatien-Diochon, 2012). This study examines how coaches perceive triangular relationships and reflect on conflicts of interest and ethical issues. During semi-structured interviews, nine coaches drew their interpretations of how triangular relationships unfold in executive coaching processes. Coaches’ explanations were categorized into three groups. There are coaches who understand executive coaching as a harmonious and congruent process, called naïve; some coaches rely on the coaching process to deal with conflicts of interest, and we called them procedural. Other coaches are skeptical when dealing with conflict of interests in triangular relationships, and were called suspicious. In order to support coaches facing ethical dilemmas that may be present in triangular relationships in the executive coaching process, the ethics of the profession perspective developed for the educational sector by Shapiro and Stefkovich (2016) was adapted and integrated into Carroll and Shaw’s (2013) ethical maturity perspective. This adapted model offers coaches an integrative and dynamic view to foster their development and ethical maturity. © 2017, ANPAD - Associacao Nacional de Pos-Graduacao e Pesquisa em Administracao. All rights reserved.
id FGV_1461f43ac8fa1d25c866621f31f77d0d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/25187
network_acronym_str FGV
network_name_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
repository_id_str 3974
spelling Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva VieiraEscolas::EAESPFGV2018-10-25T18:23:22Z2018-10-25T18:23:22Z20171807-7692http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25187https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040718610&doi=10.1590%2f1807-7692bar2017170050&partnerID=40&md5=65a67941eb7a87a76aee906171154a1410.1590/1807-7692bar20171700502-s2.0-85040718610Executive coaching is a common leadership development intervention whose complexity is underestimated. The triangular relationships between coachee, coach, and organization give rise to conflicting interests (Fatien-Diochon, 2012). This study examines how coaches perceive triangular relationships and reflect on conflicts of interest and ethical issues. During semi-structured interviews, nine coaches drew their interpretations of how triangular relationships unfold in executive coaching processes. Coaches’ explanations were categorized into three groups. There are coaches who understand executive coaching as a harmonious and congruent process, called naïve; some coaches rely on the coaching process to deal with conflicts of interest, and we called them procedural. Other coaches are skeptical when dealing with conflict of interests in triangular relationships, and were called suspicious. In order to support coaches facing ethical dilemmas that may be present in triangular relationships in the executive coaching process, the ethics of the profession perspective developed for the educational sector by Shapiro and Stefkovich (2016) was adapted and integrated into Carroll and Shaw’s (2013) ethical maturity perspective. This adapted model offers coaches an integrative and dynamic view to foster their development and ethical maturity. © 2017, ANPAD - Associacao Nacional de Pos-Graduacao e Pesquisa em Administracao. All rights reserved.engANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em AdministraçãoBAR - Brazilian Administration ReviewScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVEthical maturityExecutive coachingSocial constructionismTriangular relationshipAssessoria empresarialConstrucionismo socialCapacitação de empregadosDrawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coachingArticle (Journal/Review)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTEXT2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf.txt2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain79854https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/df2f3d9d-4f1d-4001-aade-27d3913a6e98/download227b89c8ab7ded395ca2a623dbef1d62MD54ORIGINAL2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf2-s2.0-85040718610.pdfapplication/pdf692155https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/bdd5fdcb-ae9b-4243-8b43-e1cdbf4f9748/download9ad3b2c18b54242092b7de1c87db7ab6MD51THUMBNAIL2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf.jpg2-s2.0-85040718610.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3369https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/3ccfdcd6-814d-461e-b25a-07de772cd7cd/downloaddeee02b9fd5f1db77a91b41d9d289f85MD5510438/251872023-11-28 10:43:12.087open.accessoai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/25187https://repositorio.fgv.brRepositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace-oai/requestopendoar:39742023-11-28T10:43:12Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching
title Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching
spellingShingle Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching
Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira
Ethical maturity
Executive coaching
Social constructionism
Triangular relationship
Assessoria empresarial
Construcionismo social
Capacitação de empregados
title_short Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching
title_full Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching
title_fullStr Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching
title_full_unstemmed Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching
title_sort Drawing the triangle: how coaches manage ambiguities inherited in executive coaching
author Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira
author_facet Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira
author_role author
dc.contributor.unidadefgv.por.fl_str_mv Escolas::EAESP
dc.contributor.affiliation.none.fl_str_mv FGV
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pliopas, Ana Luísa Villares da Silva Vieira
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Ethical maturity
Executive coaching
Social constructionism
Triangular relationship
topic Ethical maturity
Executive coaching
Social constructionism
Triangular relationship
Assessoria empresarial
Construcionismo social
Capacitação de empregados
dc.subject.bibliodata.por.fl_str_mv Assessoria empresarial
Construcionismo social
Capacitação de empregados
description Executive coaching is a common leadership development intervention whose complexity is underestimated. The triangular relationships between coachee, coach, and organization give rise to conflicting interests (Fatien-Diochon, 2012). This study examines how coaches perceive triangular relationships and reflect on conflicts of interest and ethical issues. During semi-structured interviews, nine coaches drew their interpretations of how triangular relationships unfold in executive coaching processes. Coaches’ explanations were categorized into three groups. There are coaches who understand executive coaching as a harmonious and congruent process, called naïve; some coaches rely on the coaching process to deal with conflicts of interest, and we called them procedural. Other coaches are skeptical when dealing with conflict of interests in triangular relationships, and were called suspicious. In order to support coaches facing ethical dilemmas that may be present in triangular relationships in the executive coaching process, the ethics of the profession perspective developed for the educational sector by Shapiro and Stefkovich (2016) was adapted and integrated into Carroll and Shaw’s (2013) ethical maturity perspective. This adapted model offers coaches an integrative and dynamic view to foster their development and ethical maturity. © 2017, ANPAD - Associacao Nacional de Pos-Graduacao e Pesquisa em Administracao. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-10-25T18:23:22Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-10-25T18:23:22Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Article (Journal/Review)
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25187
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040718610&doi=10.1590%2f1807-7692bar2017170050&partnerID=40&md5=65a67941eb7a87a76aee906171154a14
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1807-7692
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-7692bar2017170050
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv 2-s2.0-85040718610
identifier_str_mv 1807-7692
10.1590/1807-7692bar2017170050
2-s2.0-85040718610
url http://hdl.handle.net/10438/25187
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040718610&doi=10.1590%2f1807-7692bar2017170050&partnerID=40&md5=65a67941eb7a87a76aee906171154a14
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.eng.fl_str_mv BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
collection Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/df2f3d9d-4f1d-4001-aade-27d3913a6e98/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/bdd5fdcb-ae9b-4243-8b43-e1cdbf4f9748/download
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/3ccfdcd6-814d-461e-b25a-07de772cd7cd/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 227b89c8ab7ded395ca2a623dbef1d62
9ad3b2c18b54242092b7de1c87db7ab6
deee02b9fd5f1db77a91b41d9d289f85
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1827846644076380160