Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bager, Alex
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Rosa, Clarissa Alves da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biota Neotropica
Texto Completo: https://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/BN/article/view/730
Resumo: We propose a ranking index to assign priorities to sites for implementation of measures to mitigate wildlife roadkill. We conducted a case study along 34 km of highway BR 392 in Southern Brazil. We compared priority sites established only according to roadkill rates, with those defined by our index. The index used four parameters: the richness of target species, diversity of roadkilled species, roadkill rate of target species, and presence of endangered species. Although it is impossible to protect the entire community of vertebrates affected by roadkill, we defined nine target species, five mammals and four reptiles. For each parameter, we defined coefficients ranging between 0 and 3. There was a significant change in the priorities of sites for implementing mitigation devices, which caused changes in the species that were protected. The definition of priority sites by considering only the roadkill rate protected reptiles especially, to the detriment of all mammal species, including endangered species. Sites with high roadkill rates continued to be among the most important for conservation, but the index diluted the effect of this parameter, changing the ranking. This ranking index can be an effective tool to aid government institutions in decision-making, especially when more elaborate analyses are not feasible for reasons of time, resources, or lack of trained personnel.
id FAPESP-1_2b2537b4f5f17ccbbd1459fb5fa115bc
oai_identifier_str oai:biotaneotropica.org.br:article/730
network_acronym_str FAPESP-1
network_name_str Biota Neotropica
repository_id_str
spelling Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkillPriority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkillHierarquização de quilômetros prioritários à mitigação de atropelamentos de animais selvagensdecision-makingranking indexmitigationroad ecologyroadkilldecision-makingranking indexmitigationroad ecologyroadkilltomada de decisãoíndice de prioridademitigação de impactosecologia de estradasatropelamentoWe propose a ranking index to assign priorities to sites for implementation of measures to mitigate wildlife roadkill. We conducted a case study along 34 km of highway BR 392 in Southern Brazil. We compared priority sites established only according to roadkill rates, with those defined by our index. The index used four parameters: the richness of target species, diversity of roadkilled species, roadkill rate of target species, and presence of endangered species. Although it is impossible to protect the entire community of vertebrates affected by roadkill, we defined nine target species, five mammals and four reptiles. For each parameter, we defined coefficients ranging between 0 and 3. There was a significant change in the priorities of sites for implementing mitigation devices, which caused changes in the species that were protected. The definition of priority sites by considering only the roadkill rate protected reptiles especially, to the detriment of all mammal species, including endangered species. Sites with high roadkill rates continued to be among the most important for conservation, but the index diluted the effect of this parameter, changing the ranking. This ranking index can be an effective tool to aid government institutions in decision-making, especially when more elaborate analyses are not feasible for reasons of time, resources, or lack of trained personnel.We propose a ranking index to assign priorities to sites for implementation of measures to mitigate wildlife roadkill. We conducted a case study along 34 km of highway BR 392 in Southern Brazil. We compared priority sites established only according to roadkill rates, with those defined by our index. The index used four parameters: the richness of target species, diversity of roadkilled species, roadkill rate of target species, and presence of endangered species. Although it is impossible to protect the entire community of vertebrates affected by roadkill, we defined nine target species, five mammals and four reptiles. For each parameter, we defined coefficients ranging between 0 and 3. There was a significant change in the priorities of sites for implementing mitigation devices, which caused changes in the species that were protected. The definition of priority sites by considering only the roadkill rate protected reptiles especially, to the detriment of all mammal species, including endangered species. Sites with high roadkill rates continued to be among the most important for conservation, but the index diluted the effect of this parameter, changing the ranking. This ranking index can be an effective tool to aid government institutions in decision-making, especially when more elaborate analyses are not feasible for reasons of time, resources, or lack of trained personnel.Propomos um índice para a definição de trechos prioritários à implantação de medidas de mitigação contra atropelamento de animais selvagens. Conduzimos um estudo de caso em 34 km da rodovia BR 392, no Sul do Brasil. Comparamos trechos prioritários definidos somente com taxas de atropelamento e trechos prioritários definidos pelo índice. O índice se utilizou de 4 parâmetros: riqueza de espécies alvo, diversidade total de espécies atropeladas, taxa de atropelamento de espécies atropeladas e presença de espécies ameaçadas. Considerando ser impossível proteger toda a comunidade de vertebrados afetada por atropelamento definimos 9 espécies alvo, 5 mamíferos e 4 répteis. Para cada parâmetro foram definidos coeficientes com valores entre 0 e 3. Houve uma significativa mudança nos trechos prioritários para implantação de aparatos de mitigação, alterando as espécies que foram protegidas. Os trechos, definidos somente pela taxa de atropelamento, protegeram especialmente répteis, em detrimento de todos os mamíferos, incluindo as espécies ameaçadas. Trechos com altas taxas de atropelamento continuaram entre os mais importantes para conservação, mas o índice diluiu o efeito deste parâmetro, alterando sua prioridade. O índice pode ser uma ferramenta efetiva para a tomada de decisão em instituições governamentais, especialmente quando análises mais elaboradas não são viáveis em razão de tempo, recursos ou ausência de pessoal especializado.SciELO Brasil2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/BN/article/view/730Biota Neotropica; Vol. 10 No. 4 (2010): v10n4Biota Neotropica; Vol. 10 Núm. 4 (2010): v10n4Biota Neotropica; v. 10 n. 4 (2010): v10n41676-0603reponame:Biota Neotropicainstname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)instacron:BIOTA - FAPESPenghttps://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/BN/article/view/730/1326https://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/BN/article/view/730/1327Copyright (c) 2010 <span class="primary-color">Biota</span> <span class="secondary-color">Neotropica</span>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBager, AlexRosa, Clarissa Alves da2021-10-02T01:53:16Zoai:biotaneotropica.org.br:article/730Revistahttps://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v20n1/pt/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcjoly@unicamp.br || jasalim@unicamp.br1676-06111676-0611opendoar:2026-01-09T10:23:48.616847Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill
Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill
Hierarquização de quilômetros prioritários à mitigação de atropelamentos de animais selvagens
title Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill
spellingShingle Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill
Bager, Alex
decision-making
ranking index
mitigation
road ecology
roadkill
decision-making
ranking index
mitigation
road ecology
roadkill
tomada de decisão
índice de prioridade
mitigação de impactos
ecologia de estradas
atropelamento
title_short Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill
title_full Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill
title_fullStr Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill
title_full_unstemmed Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill
title_sort Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill
author Bager, Alex
author_facet Bager, Alex
Rosa, Clarissa Alves da
author_role author
author2 Rosa, Clarissa Alves da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bager, Alex
Rosa, Clarissa Alves da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv decision-making
ranking index
mitigation
road ecology
roadkill
decision-making
ranking index
mitigation
road ecology
roadkill
tomada de decisão
índice de prioridade
mitigação de impactos
ecologia de estradas
atropelamento
topic decision-making
ranking index
mitigation
road ecology
roadkill
decision-making
ranking index
mitigation
road ecology
roadkill
tomada de decisão
índice de prioridade
mitigação de impactos
ecologia de estradas
atropelamento
description We propose a ranking index to assign priorities to sites for implementation of measures to mitigate wildlife roadkill. We conducted a case study along 34 km of highway BR 392 in Southern Brazil. We compared priority sites established only according to roadkill rates, with those defined by our index. The index used four parameters: the richness of target species, diversity of roadkilled species, roadkill rate of target species, and presence of endangered species. Although it is impossible to protect the entire community of vertebrates affected by roadkill, we defined nine target species, five mammals and four reptiles. For each parameter, we defined coefficients ranging between 0 and 3. There was a significant change in the priorities of sites for implementing mitigation devices, which caused changes in the species that were protected. The definition of priority sites by considering only the roadkill rate protected reptiles especially, to the detriment of all mammal species, including endangered species. Sites with high roadkill rates continued to be among the most important for conservation, but the index diluted the effect of this parameter, changing the ranking. This ranking index can be an effective tool to aid government institutions in decision-making, especially when more elaborate analyses are not feasible for reasons of time, resources, or lack of trained personnel.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/BN/article/view/730
url https://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/BN/article/view/730
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/BN/article/view/730/1326
https://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/BN/article/view/730/1327
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Biota Neotropica; Vol. 10 No. 4 (2010): v10n4
Biota Neotropica; Vol. 10 Núm. 4 (2010): v10n4
Biota Neotropica; v. 10 n. 4 (2010): v10n4
1676-0603
reponame:Biota Neotropica
instname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)
instacron:BIOTA - FAPESP
instname_str Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)
instacron_str BIOTA - FAPESP
institution BIOTA - FAPESP
reponame_str Biota Neotropica
collection Biota Neotropica
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cjoly@unicamp.br || jasalim@unicamp.br
_version_ 1853845938145067008