Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of Pakistan

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hasni,MS
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Chaudhary,M, Mushtaq,MH, Durrani,AZ, Rashid,HB, Ali,M, Ahmed,M, Sattar,H, Aqib,AI, Zhang,H
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2021000300304
Summary: ABSTRACT A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate seroprevalence and virus prevalence of the H9 subtype of avian influenza virus in non-vaccinated broiler farms of dense poultry-populated districts, Lahore and Sheikhupura of Punjab-Pakistan. A convenient sampling method was adopted for collection of blood (n=500) and oropharyngeal swab (n=500) samples from 25 broiler farms of each district for hemagglutination inhibition assay and RT-PCR test, respectively. Proportional estimates were calculated using R software and overall seroprevalence of H9 was estimated at 36.3% (95% CI 33.3-39), with no significant difference (p>0.05) between Lahore (37.2 %, 95% CI=31.2-39.59) and Sheikhupura (35.4%, 95% CI= 29.64-39.76). RT-PCR identified 2% (4/200) pool level viral prevalence. None of the farms from Lahore districts were RT-PCR positive for H9. Simple logistic regression followed by multivariable analysis, identified the presence of foot bath/dipping area at the entrance (OR=0.7, 95% CI=0.52-0.93) and availability of rubber shoes for visitors (OR=0.36, 95% CI 0.26-0.48) as protective factors. History of respiratory signs (OR=1.51, 95%=CI 1.12-2.04), history of sudden death in past flocks (OR=3.26, 95% CI=2.41-4.41), and birds previously infected with avian influenza virus (OR=1.33, 95% CI=1-1.76) were significant risk factors. Negligence in preventive measures at farms level was associated with the spread of H9 infection between the farms. To control future outbreaks, biosecurity and continuous monitoring of non-vaccinated flocks are suggested.
id FACTA-1_c33aada5688aa6dda15c1b355ea6498f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-635X2021000300304
network_acronym_str FACTA-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of PakistanAvian InfluenzaBroilersH9PCRPrevalenceABSTRACT A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate seroprevalence and virus prevalence of the H9 subtype of avian influenza virus in non-vaccinated broiler farms of dense poultry-populated districts, Lahore and Sheikhupura of Punjab-Pakistan. A convenient sampling method was adopted for collection of blood (n=500) and oropharyngeal swab (n=500) samples from 25 broiler farms of each district for hemagglutination inhibition assay and RT-PCR test, respectively. Proportional estimates were calculated using R software and overall seroprevalence of H9 was estimated at 36.3% (95% CI 33.3-39), with no significant difference (p>0.05) between Lahore (37.2 %, 95% CI=31.2-39.59) and Sheikhupura (35.4%, 95% CI= 29.64-39.76). RT-PCR identified 2% (4/200) pool level viral prevalence. None of the farms from Lahore districts were RT-PCR positive for H9. Simple logistic regression followed by multivariable analysis, identified the presence of foot bath/dipping area at the entrance (OR=0.7, 95% CI=0.52-0.93) and availability of rubber shoes for visitors (OR=0.36, 95% CI 0.26-0.48) as protective factors. History of respiratory signs (OR=1.51, 95%=CI 1.12-2.04), history of sudden death in past flocks (OR=3.26, 95% CI=2.41-4.41), and birds previously infected with avian influenza virus (OR=1.33, 95% CI=1-1.76) were significant risk factors. Negligence in preventive measures at farms level was associated with the spread of H9 infection between the farms. To control future outbreaks, biosecurity and continuous monitoring of non-vaccinated flocks are suggested.Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2021000300304Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.23 n.3 2021reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)instacron:FACTA10.1590/1806-9061-2020-1392info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHasni,MSChaudhary,MMushtaq,MHDurrani,AZRashid,HBAli,MAhmed,MSattar,HAqib,AIZhang,Heng2021-07-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-635X2021000300304Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbcahttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rvfacta@terra.com.br1806-90611516-635Xopendoar:2021-07-20T00:00Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of Pakistan
title Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of Pakistan
spellingShingle Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of Pakistan
Hasni,MS
Avian Influenza
Broilers
H9
PCR
Prevalence
title_short Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of Pakistan
title_full Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of Pakistan
title_fullStr Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of Pakistan
title_full_unstemmed Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of Pakistan
title_sort Active Surveillance and Risk Assessment of Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9 from Non-Vaccinated Commercial Broilers of Pakistan
author Hasni,MS
author_facet Hasni,MS
Chaudhary,M
Mushtaq,MH
Durrani,AZ
Rashid,HB
Ali,M
Ahmed,M
Sattar,H
Aqib,AI
Zhang,H
author_role author
author2 Chaudhary,M
Mushtaq,MH
Durrani,AZ
Rashid,HB
Ali,M
Ahmed,M
Sattar,H
Aqib,AI
Zhang,H
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hasni,MS
Chaudhary,M
Mushtaq,MH
Durrani,AZ
Rashid,HB
Ali,M
Ahmed,M
Sattar,H
Aqib,AI
Zhang,H
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Avian Influenza
Broilers
H9
PCR
Prevalence
topic Avian Influenza
Broilers
H9
PCR
Prevalence
description ABSTRACT A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate seroprevalence and virus prevalence of the H9 subtype of avian influenza virus in non-vaccinated broiler farms of dense poultry-populated districts, Lahore and Sheikhupura of Punjab-Pakistan. A convenient sampling method was adopted for collection of blood (n=500) and oropharyngeal swab (n=500) samples from 25 broiler farms of each district for hemagglutination inhibition assay and RT-PCR test, respectively. Proportional estimates were calculated using R software and overall seroprevalence of H9 was estimated at 36.3% (95% CI 33.3-39), with no significant difference (p>0.05) between Lahore (37.2 %, 95% CI=31.2-39.59) and Sheikhupura (35.4%, 95% CI= 29.64-39.76). RT-PCR identified 2% (4/200) pool level viral prevalence. None of the farms from Lahore districts were RT-PCR positive for H9. Simple logistic regression followed by multivariable analysis, identified the presence of foot bath/dipping area at the entrance (OR=0.7, 95% CI=0.52-0.93) and availability of rubber shoes for visitors (OR=0.36, 95% CI 0.26-0.48) as protective factors. History of respiratory signs (OR=1.51, 95%=CI 1.12-2.04), history of sudden death in past flocks (OR=3.26, 95% CI=2.41-4.41), and birds previously infected with avian influenza virus (OR=1.33, 95% CI=1-1.76) were significant risk factors. Negligence in preventive measures at farms level was associated with the spread of H9 infection between the farms. To control future outbreaks, biosecurity and continuous monitoring of non-vaccinated flocks are suggested.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2021000300304
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2021000300304
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9061-2020-1392
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.23 n.3 2021
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron:FACTA
instname_str Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron_str FACTA
institution FACTA
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rvfacta@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754122515694747648