Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Corrêa,Isadora M.O.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Pereira,Larissa Q., Silva,Isabella G.O., Altarugio,Rafaela, Smaniotto,Bruna D., Silva,Tarcísio M., Okamoto,Adriano S., Andreatti Filho,Raphael L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000701300
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Salmonella detection is a key point in food safety testing, because of the frequent association of this pathogen with food poisoning in humans. The standard bacteriological tests currently used for Salmonella-detection are time-consuming; therefore, there is a need to develop alternative methods to accelerate the detection. In order to accelerate Salmonella diagnosis, we used the immunomagnetic separation assay associated with bacteriophage P22 for the rapid detection of the following Salmonella serovars in chicken rinses of drumsticks, artificially contaminated with 5, 10, and 100 CFU/25mL of bacteria: Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg), Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium). The efficiency of the technique, represented by the time required for detection of positive and negative samples, was compared with that of the standard diagnostic tests used for this pathogen, the bacteriological assay and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based test. This study confirmed the ability of the bacteriophage-associated immunomagnetic separation assay to identify 99.6% of Salmonella-positive samples of the three serovars tested. In contrast, the bacteriological assay and PCR-based test detected 95.1% and 98.5% of the Salmonella-positive samples respectively.
id EMBRAPA-2_86affa0ea2e9d417c879f2c3b5e461f7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-736X2018000701300
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-2
network_name_str Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinseDiagnosticSalmonella entericaserovarschicken rinsephage P22Salmonella HeidelbergSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella EnteritidisimmunomagneticABSTRACT: Salmonella detection is a key point in food safety testing, because of the frequent association of this pathogen with food poisoning in humans. The standard bacteriological tests currently used for Salmonella-detection are time-consuming; therefore, there is a need to develop alternative methods to accelerate the detection. In order to accelerate Salmonella diagnosis, we used the immunomagnetic separation assay associated with bacteriophage P22 for the rapid detection of the following Salmonella serovars in chicken rinses of drumsticks, artificially contaminated with 5, 10, and 100 CFU/25mL of bacteria: Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg), Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium). The efficiency of the technique, represented by the time required for detection of positive and negative samples, was compared with that of the standard diagnostic tests used for this pathogen, the bacteriological assay and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based test. This study confirmed the ability of the bacteriophage-associated immunomagnetic separation assay to identify 99.6% of Salmonella-positive samples of the three serovars tested. In contrast, the bacteriological assay and PCR-based test detected 95.1% and 98.5% of the Salmonella-positive samples respectively.Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000701300Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.38 n.7 2018reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)instacron:EMBRAPA10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5211info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorrêa,Isadora M.O.Pereira,Larissa Q.Silva,Isabella G.O.Altarugio,RafaelaSmaniotto,Bruna D.Silva,Tarcísio M.Okamoto,Adriano S.Andreatti Filho,Raphael L.eng2018-10-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-736X2018000701300Revistahttp://www.pvb.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcolegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br0100-736X1678-5150opendoar:2018-10-10T00:00Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse
title Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse
spellingShingle Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse
Corrêa,Isadora M.O.
Diagnostic
Salmonella enterica
serovars
chicken rinse
phage P22
Salmonella Heidelberg
Salmonella Typhimurium
Salmonella Enteritidis
immunomagnetic
title_short Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse
title_full Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse
title_fullStr Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse
title_sort Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse
author Corrêa,Isadora M.O.
author_facet Corrêa,Isadora M.O.
Pereira,Larissa Q.
Silva,Isabella G.O.
Altarugio,Rafaela
Smaniotto,Bruna D.
Silva,Tarcísio M.
Okamoto,Adriano S.
Andreatti Filho,Raphael L.
author_role author
author2 Pereira,Larissa Q.
Silva,Isabella G.O.
Altarugio,Rafaela
Smaniotto,Bruna D.
Silva,Tarcísio M.
Okamoto,Adriano S.
Andreatti Filho,Raphael L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Corrêa,Isadora M.O.
Pereira,Larissa Q.
Silva,Isabella G.O.
Altarugio,Rafaela
Smaniotto,Bruna D.
Silva,Tarcísio M.
Okamoto,Adriano S.
Andreatti Filho,Raphael L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diagnostic
Salmonella enterica
serovars
chicken rinse
phage P22
Salmonella Heidelberg
Salmonella Typhimurium
Salmonella Enteritidis
immunomagnetic
topic Diagnostic
Salmonella enterica
serovars
chicken rinse
phage P22
Salmonella Heidelberg
Salmonella Typhimurium
Salmonella Enteritidis
immunomagnetic
description ABSTRACT: Salmonella detection is a key point in food safety testing, because of the frequent association of this pathogen with food poisoning in humans. The standard bacteriological tests currently used for Salmonella-detection are time-consuming; therefore, there is a need to develop alternative methods to accelerate the detection. In order to accelerate Salmonella diagnosis, we used the immunomagnetic separation assay associated with bacteriophage P22 for the rapid detection of the following Salmonella serovars in chicken rinses of drumsticks, artificially contaminated with 5, 10, and 100 CFU/25mL of bacteria: Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg), Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium). The efficiency of the technique, represented by the time required for detection of positive and negative samples, was compared with that of the standard diagnostic tests used for this pathogen, the bacteriological assay and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based test. This study confirmed the ability of the bacteriophage-associated immunomagnetic separation assay to identify 99.6% of Salmonella-positive samples of the three serovars tested. In contrast, the bacteriological assay and PCR-based test detected 95.1% and 98.5% of the Salmonella-positive samples respectively.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000701300
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000701300
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5211
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.38 n.7 2018
reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv colegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br
_version_ 1754122238819303424