Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
| Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000701300 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Salmonella detection is a key point in food safety testing, because of the frequent association of this pathogen with food poisoning in humans. The standard bacteriological tests currently used for Salmonella-detection are time-consuming; therefore, there is a need to develop alternative methods to accelerate the detection. In order to accelerate Salmonella diagnosis, we used the immunomagnetic separation assay associated with bacteriophage P22 for the rapid detection of the following Salmonella serovars in chicken rinses of drumsticks, artificially contaminated with 5, 10, and 100 CFU/25mL of bacteria: Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg), Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium). The efficiency of the technique, represented by the time required for detection of positive and negative samples, was compared with that of the standard diagnostic tests used for this pathogen, the bacteriological assay and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based test. This study confirmed the ability of the bacteriophage-associated immunomagnetic separation assay to identify 99.6% of Salmonella-positive samples of the three serovars tested. In contrast, the bacteriological assay and PCR-based test detected 95.1% and 98.5% of the Salmonella-positive samples respectively. |
| id |
EMBRAPA-2_86affa0ea2e9d417c879f2c3b5e461f7 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-736X2018000701300 |
| network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-2 |
| network_name_str |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinseDiagnosticSalmonella entericaserovarschicken rinsephage P22Salmonella HeidelbergSalmonella TyphimuriumSalmonella EnteritidisimmunomagneticABSTRACT: Salmonella detection is a key point in food safety testing, because of the frequent association of this pathogen with food poisoning in humans. The standard bacteriological tests currently used for Salmonella-detection are time-consuming; therefore, there is a need to develop alternative methods to accelerate the detection. In order to accelerate Salmonella diagnosis, we used the immunomagnetic separation assay associated with bacteriophage P22 for the rapid detection of the following Salmonella serovars in chicken rinses of drumsticks, artificially contaminated with 5, 10, and 100 CFU/25mL of bacteria: Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg), Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium). The efficiency of the technique, represented by the time required for detection of positive and negative samples, was compared with that of the standard diagnostic tests used for this pathogen, the bacteriological assay and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based test. This study confirmed the ability of the bacteriophage-associated immunomagnetic separation assay to identify 99.6% of Salmonella-positive samples of the three serovars tested. In contrast, the bacteriological assay and PCR-based test detected 95.1% and 98.5% of the Salmonella-positive samples respectively.Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000701300Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.38 n.7 2018reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)instacron:EMBRAPA10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5211info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorrêa,Isadora M.O.Pereira,Larissa Q.Silva,Isabella G.O.Altarugio,RafaelaSmaniotto,Bruna D.Silva,Tarcísio M.Okamoto,Adriano S.Andreatti Filho,Raphael L.eng2018-10-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-736X2018000701300Revistahttp://www.pvb.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcolegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br0100-736X1678-5150opendoar:2018-10-10T00:00Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse |
| title |
Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse |
| spellingShingle |
Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse Corrêa,Isadora M.O. Diagnostic Salmonella enterica serovars chicken rinse phage P22 Salmonella Heidelberg Salmonella Typhimurium Salmonella Enteritidis immunomagnetic |
| title_short |
Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse |
| title_full |
Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse |
| title_sort |
Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse |
| author |
Corrêa,Isadora M.O. |
| author_facet |
Corrêa,Isadora M.O. Pereira,Larissa Q. Silva,Isabella G.O. Altarugio,Rafaela Smaniotto,Bruna D. Silva,Tarcísio M. Okamoto,Adriano S. Andreatti Filho,Raphael L. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Pereira,Larissa Q. Silva,Isabella G.O. Altarugio,Rafaela Smaniotto,Bruna D. Silva,Tarcísio M. Okamoto,Adriano S. Andreatti Filho,Raphael L. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Corrêa,Isadora M.O. Pereira,Larissa Q. Silva,Isabella G.O. Altarugio,Rafaela Smaniotto,Bruna D. Silva,Tarcísio M. Okamoto,Adriano S. Andreatti Filho,Raphael L. |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Diagnostic Salmonella enterica serovars chicken rinse phage P22 Salmonella Heidelberg Salmonella Typhimurium Salmonella Enteritidis immunomagnetic |
| topic |
Diagnostic Salmonella enterica serovars chicken rinse phage P22 Salmonella Heidelberg Salmonella Typhimurium Salmonella Enteritidis immunomagnetic |
| description |
ABSTRACT: Salmonella detection is a key point in food safety testing, because of the frequent association of this pathogen with food poisoning in humans. The standard bacteriological tests currently used for Salmonella-detection are time-consuming; therefore, there is a need to develop alternative methods to accelerate the detection. In order to accelerate Salmonella diagnosis, we used the immunomagnetic separation assay associated with bacteriophage P22 for the rapid detection of the following Salmonella serovars in chicken rinses of drumsticks, artificially contaminated with 5, 10, and 100 CFU/25mL of bacteria: Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg (S. Heidelberg), Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium). The efficiency of the technique, represented by the time required for detection of positive and negative samples, was compared with that of the standard diagnostic tests used for this pathogen, the bacteriological assay and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based test. This study confirmed the ability of the bacteriophage-associated immunomagnetic separation assay to identify 99.6% of Salmonella-positive samples of the three serovars tested. In contrast, the bacteriological assay and PCR-based test detected 95.1% and 98.5% of the Salmonella-positive samples respectively. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-01 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000701300 |
| url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2018000701300 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-5211 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal - CBPA |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira v.38 n.7 2018 reponame:Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA) instacron:EMBRAPA |
| instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA) |
| instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
| institution |
EMBRAPA |
| reponame_str |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
| collection |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Patologia Animal (CBPA) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
colegio@cbpa.org.br||pvb@pvb.com.br |
| _version_ |
1754122238819303424 |