What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Revista de Economia Política |
Download full: | https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/2422 |
Summary: | There are 553 development banks in the world: 18% of these institutions haveemerged since the 2008 financial crisis. There is a large theoretical literature on such institutions,but the evidence on their effectiveness is scattered. This paper provides a systematicreview of causal effect studies of one of the largest and most representative developmentbanks in the world, the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES). We review 48 academic papersthat estimate BNDES loans and credit programs impact in several policy dimensions. Ingeneral, the evidence indicates that development banks can be an effective instrument to increaseinvestment, exports, employment and GDP, particularly when borrowers are micro,small and medium-sized companies. The Brazilian experience also suggests that developmentbanks can be an important tool to fight against climate change, reducing deforestation. Onthe other hand, evidence indicates that the greatest difficulty for these institutions is to generatepositive impacts on productivity, an essential variable for economic growth. Finally, theevidence is inconclusive on political influence on development bank’s loans. JEL Classification: H81; L38; L52. |
id |
EDITORA-34_fa7482c90c0f81b51d07bb257c7d3192 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.centrodeeconomiapolitica.org:article/2422 |
network_acronym_str |
EDITORA-34 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Economia Política |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from BrazilO que aprendemos sobre os Bancos Nacionais de Desenvolvimento? Evidências do BrasilBancos de desenvolvimentobancos estataisrevisão sistemáticaBNDESDevelopment banksstate-owned bankssystematic reviewBNDESThere are 553 development banks in the world: 18% of these institutions haveemerged since the 2008 financial crisis. There is a large theoretical literature on such institutions,but the evidence on their effectiveness is scattered. This paper provides a systematicreview of causal effect studies of one of the largest and most representative developmentbanks in the world, the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES). We review 48 academic papersthat estimate BNDES loans and credit programs impact in several policy dimensions. Ingeneral, the evidence indicates that development banks can be an effective instrument to increaseinvestment, exports, employment and GDP, particularly when borrowers are micro,small and medium-sized companies. The Brazilian experience also suggests that developmentbanks can be an important tool to fight against climate change, reducing deforestation. Onthe other hand, evidence indicates that the greatest difficulty for these institutions is to generatepositive impacts on productivity, an essential variable for economic growth. Finally, theevidence is inconclusive on political influence on development bank’s loans. JEL Classification: H81; L38; L52.Existem 553 bancos de desenvolvimento no mundo: 18% dessas instituições surgiramdesde a crise financeira de 2008. Existe uma vasta literatura teórica sobre tais instituições,mas as evidências sobre sua eficácia são dispersas. Este artigo fornece uma revisão sistemáticados estudos de efeito causal de um dos maiores e mais representativos bancos dedesenvolvimento do mundo, o Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social(BNDES). Analisamos 48 trabalhos acadêmicos que estimam o impacto dos empréstimos eprogramas de crédito do BNDES em várias dimensões de políticas. Em geral, as evidênciasindicam que os bancos de desenvolvimento podem ser um instrumento eficaz para aumentaro investimento, as exportações, o emprego e o PIB, principalmente quando os tomadores deempréstimo são micro, pequenas e médias empresas. A experiência brasileira também sugereque os bancos de desenvolvimento podem ser uma importante ferramenta de combate àsmudanças climáticas, reduzindo o desmatamento. Por outro lado, evidências indicam que amaior dificuldade dessas instituições é gerar impactos positivos na produtividade, variável essencial para o crescimento econômico. Finalmente, as evidências são inconclusivas sobre ainfluência política nos empréstimos do banco de desenvolvimento.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Bancos de desenvolvimento; bancos estatais; revisão sistemática;BNDES. Classificação JEL: H81; L38; L52.Center of Political Economy2023-08-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/242210.1590/0101-31572023-3467Brazilian Journal of Political Economy; Vol. 43 No. 3 (2023): Jul-Sep / 2023; 646-669Brazilian Journal of Political Economy; v. 43 n. 3 (2023): Jul-Set / 2023; 646-6691809-45380101-3157reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_34enghttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/2422/2355Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Journal of Political Economyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarboza, RicardoPessoa, SamuelRoitman, FábioRibeiro, Eduardo Pontual2023-08-11T20:04:38Zoai:ojs2.centrodeeconomiapolitica.org:article/2422Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2023-08-11T20:04:38Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil O que aprendemos sobre os Bancos Nacionais de Desenvolvimento? Evidências do Brasil |
title |
What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil |
spellingShingle |
What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil Barboza, Ricardo Bancos de desenvolvimento bancos estatais revisão sistemática BNDES Development banks state-owned banks systematic review BNDES |
title_short |
What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil |
title_full |
What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil |
title_fullStr |
What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil |
title_sort |
What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil |
author |
Barboza, Ricardo |
author_facet |
Barboza, Ricardo Pessoa, Samuel Roitman, Fábio Ribeiro, Eduardo Pontual |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pessoa, Samuel Roitman, Fábio Ribeiro, Eduardo Pontual |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barboza, Ricardo Pessoa, Samuel Roitman, Fábio Ribeiro, Eduardo Pontual |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bancos de desenvolvimento bancos estatais revisão sistemática BNDES Development banks state-owned banks systematic review BNDES |
topic |
Bancos de desenvolvimento bancos estatais revisão sistemática BNDES Development banks state-owned banks systematic review BNDES |
description |
There are 553 development banks in the world: 18% of these institutions haveemerged since the 2008 financial crisis. There is a large theoretical literature on such institutions,but the evidence on their effectiveness is scattered. This paper provides a systematicreview of causal effect studies of one of the largest and most representative developmentbanks in the world, the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES). We review 48 academic papersthat estimate BNDES loans and credit programs impact in several policy dimensions. Ingeneral, the evidence indicates that development banks can be an effective instrument to increaseinvestment, exports, employment and GDP, particularly when borrowers are micro,small and medium-sized companies. The Brazilian experience also suggests that developmentbanks can be an important tool to fight against climate change, reducing deforestation. Onthe other hand, evidence indicates that the greatest difficulty for these institutions is to generatepositive impacts on productivity, an essential variable for economic growth. Finally, theevidence is inconclusive on political influence on development bank’s loans. JEL Classification: H81; L38; L52. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/2422 10.1590/0101-31572023-3467 |
url |
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/2422 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0101-31572023-3467 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/2422/2355 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Journal of Political Economy info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Journal of Political Economy |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Center of Political Economy |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Center of Political Economy |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy; Vol. 43 No. 3 (2023): Jul-Sep / 2023; 646-669 Brazilian Journal of Political Economy; v. 43 n. 3 (2023): Jul-Set / 2023; 646-669 1809-4538 0101-3157 reponame:Revista de Economia Política instname:EDITORA 34 instacron:EDITORA_34 |
instname_str |
EDITORA 34 |
instacron_str |
EDITORA_34 |
institution |
EDITORA_34 |
reponame_str |
Revista de Economia Política |
collection |
Revista de Economia Política |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34 |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br |
_version_ |
1832113356855574528 |