Export Ready — 

Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pithon,Matheus Melo
Publication Date: 2014
Other Authors: Santos,Elinailton Silva dos
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000600086
Summary: OBJECTIVE: Investigate the quality of data available on the internet with respect to pain after orthognathic surgery.METHODS: A careful search was conducted on the Internet in December, 2012. The most accessed websites browsers were employed for research using the terms: "pain" and "orthognathic surgery" together. The first 30 results of each portal were examined, and after applying the exclusion criteria, 29 sites remained. All remaining websites went through an evaluation process with online tools that investigated the quality, level of reading, accessibility, usability and reliability.RESULTS: Assessment criteria outcomes were considered unfavorable. Texts were considered difficult to read with inappropriate language for the general public. The mean global validation for the 29 websites of the LIDA instrument was 65.10, thereby indicating a structure of medium quality.CONCLUSION: Information about post-orthognathic surgery pain available on the internet is poorly written and unreliable. Therefore, candidates for orthognathic surgery must seek information from specialists who, in turn, should indicate reliable sources.
id DPI-1_ed7f63a9d1e0827033e426b9e65a7b4c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512014000600086
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful reviewOrthognathic surgeryPainInternetInformationOBJECTIVE: Investigate the quality of data available on the internet with respect to pain after orthognathic surgery.METHODS: A careful search was conducted on the Internet in December, 2012. The most accessed websites browsers were employed for research using the terms: "pain" and "orthognathic surgery" together. The first 30 results of each portal were examined, and after applying the exclusion criteria, 29 sites remained. All remaining websites went through an evaluation process with online tools that investigated the quality, level of reading, accessibility, usability and reliability.RESULTS: Assessment criteria outcomes were considered unfavorable. Texts were considered difficult to read with inappropriate language for the general public. The mean global validation for the 29 websites of the LIDA instrument was 65.10, thereby indicating a structure of medium quality.CONCLUSION: Information about post-orthognathic surgery pain available on the internet is poorly written and unreliable. Therefore, candidates for orthognathic surgery must seek information from specialists who, in turn, should indicate reliable sources.Dental Press International2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000600086Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.19 n.6 2014reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.086-092.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPithon,Matheus MeloSantos,Elinailton Silva doseng2015-08-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512014000600086Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2015-08-24T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review
title Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review
spellingShingle Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review
Pithon,Matheus Melo
Orthognathic surgery
Pain
Internet
Information
title_short Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review
title_full Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review
title_fullStr Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review
title_full_unstemmed Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review
title_sort Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: A careful review
author Pithon,Matheus Melo
author_facet Pithon,Matheus Melo
Santos,Elinailton Silva dos
author_role author
author2 Santos,Elinailton Silva dos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pithon,Matheus Melo
Santos,Elinailton Silva dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthognathic surgery
Pain
Internet
Information
topic Orthognathic surgery
Pain
Internet
Information
description OBJECTIVE: Investigate the quality of data available on the internet with respect to pain after orthognathic surgery.METHODS: A careful search was conducted on the Internet in December, 2012. The most accessed websites browsers were employed for research using the terms: "pain" and "orthognathic surgery" together. The first 30 results of each portal were examined, and after applying the exclusion criteria, 29 sites remained. All remaining websites went through an evaluation process with online tools that investigated the quality, level of reading, accessibility, usability and reliability.RESULTS: Assessment criteria outcomes were considered unfavorable. Texts were considered difficult to read with inappropriate language for the general public. The mean global validation for the 29 websites of the LIDA instrument was 65.10, thereby indicating a structure of medium quality.CONCLUSION: Information about post-orthognathic surgery pain available on the internet is poorly written and unreliable. Therefore, candidates for orthognathic surgery must seek information from specialists who, in turn, should indicate reliable sources.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000600086
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000600086
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.086-092.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.19 n.6 2014
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122397198319616