Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal Matters
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/36 |
Resumo: | The following paper has as objective questioning the legitimacy of state's paternalistic interventions on individual autonomy by using institutional-criminal instruments. In this path, the paper aims to understand in which cases the State is allowed to interfere in private individual lives under the justification of being promoting a well or avoiding a harm and, as well, in which cases such interference is abusive of individuals self-determination. Into this analysis, the work will study the current concepts of paternalism, the theoretical classifications on paternalistic interventions which will be useful to demonstrate admissible and inadmissible species of paternalism and Joel Feinberg and Gerald Dworkin's anti- paternalistic theories. Following, this subject will be analyzed in association with the implications of juridical-criminal goods involved in conflicts between autonomy, human vulnerabilities and paternalism, specially regarding to the (un)availability of those goods. In the end, the work intends to define legitimation criteria for paternalistic interventions inserted in criminal laws, which superimpose themselves on the individual autonomy, in order to harmonize constitutional values of respect for autonomy, protection of vulnerable individuals and the Criminal Law functions of exclusive protection of juridical goods. |
id |
CONPEDI-39_d7db5d3fcd9b3ca3f78a9b3e47b08bf1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/36 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-39 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal MattersPaternalismo Jurídico-Penal, Autonomia e Vulnerabilidade: Critérios de Legitimação de Intervenções Paternalistas sobre a Autonomia Individual em Matéria PenalJuridical-criminal paternalismAutonomyVulnerabilityJuridical-criminal goodsPaternalismo jurídico-penalAutonomiaVulnerabilidadeBens jurídico- penaisThe following paper has as objective questioning the legitimacy of state's paternalistic interventions on individual autonomy by using institutional-criminal instruments. In this path, the paper aims to understand in which cases the State is allowed to interfere in private individual lives under the justification of being promoting a well or avoiding a harm and, as well, in which cases such interference is abusive of individuals self-determination. Into this analysis, the work will study the current concepts of paternalism, the theoretical classifications on paternalistic interventions which will be useful to demonstrate admissible and inadmissible species of paternalism and Joel Feinberg and Gerald Dworkin's anti- paternalistic theories. Following, this subject will be analyzed in association with the implications of juridical-criminal goods involved in conflicts between autonomy, human vulnerabilities and paternalism, specially regarding to the (un)availability of those goods. In the end, the work intends to define legitimation criteria for paternalistic interventions inserted in criminal laws, which superimpose themselves on the individual autonomy, in order to harmonize constitutional values of respect for autonomy, protection of vulnerable individuals and the Criminal Law functions of exclusive protection of juridical goods.O trabalho que se apresenta tem como objetivo questionar a legitimidade das intervenções paternalistas estatais sobre a autonomia individual por meio de mecanismos penalísticos institucionais. Neste sentido, o trabalho buscará compreender em que casos está o Estado autorizado a exercer ingerência na vida particular dos indivíduos sob a justificativa de promover-lhes um bem ou evitar-lhes um mal e, da mesma forma, em quais hipóteses tal ingerência é abusiva da liberdade individual de autodeterminação. Para tanto, serão estudados os conceitos correntes de paternalismo, a classificação doutrinária das intervenções paternalistas que têm a utilidade de demonstrar espécies admissíveis e inadmissíveis de paternalismo e as doutrinas antipaternalistas de Joel Feinberg e Gerald Dworkin. Em seguida, o tema será analisado em cotejo com a consideração dos bens jurídico-penais envolvidos nos conflitos entre autonomia, vulnerabilidades humanas e paternalismo, especialmente quanto à (in)disponibilidade desses bens. Ao final, pretende-se traçar critérios para a legitimação dos atos paternalistas esculpidos em leis penais que se sobrepõem ao exercício da autonomia individual, tendo-se em mira a harmonização entre os valores constitucionais de respeito à autonomia, proteção de sujeitos vulneráveis e a função do Direito Penal de exclusiva proteção de bens jurídicos.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2015-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/3610.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0065/2015.v1i1.36Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 112 - 1432526-00652526-0065reponame:Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminaisinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/36/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeto, Heráclito Mota Barreto2021-08-20T12:08:34Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/36Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/indexPRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br || indexlawjournals@gmail.com2526-00652526-0065opendoar:2021-08-20T12:08:34Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal Matters Paternalismo Jurídico-Penal, Autonomia e Vulnerabilidade: Critérios de Legitimação de Intervenções Paternalistas sobre a Autonomia Individual em Matéria Penal |
title |
Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal Matters |
spellingShingle |
Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal Matters Neto, Heráclito Mota Barreto Juridical-criminal paternalism Autonomy Vulnerability Juridical-criminal goods Paternalismo jurídico-penal Autonomia Vulnerabilidade Bens jurídico- penais |
title_short |
Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal Matters |
title_full |
Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal Matters |
title_fullStr |
Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal Matters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal Matters |
title_sort |
Juridical-Criminal Paternalism, Autonomy and Vulnerability: Legitimation Criteria of Paternalistic Interventions on Individual Autonomy in Criminal Matters |
author |
Neto, Heráclito Mota Barreto |
author_facet |
Neto, Heráclito Mota Barreto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Neto, Heráclito Mota Barreto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Juridical-criminal paternalism Autonomy Vulnerability Juridical-criminal goods Paternalismo jurídico-penal Autonomia Vulnerabilidade Bens jurídico- penais |
topic |
Juridical-criminal paternalism Autonomy Vulnerability Juridical-criminal goods Paternalismo jurídico-penal Autonomia Vulnerabilidade Bens jurídico- penais |
description |
The following paper has as objective questioning the legitimacy of state's paternalistic interventions on individual autonomy by using institutional-criminal instruments. In this path, the paper aims to understand in which cases the State is allowed to interfere in private individual lives under the justification of being promoting a well or avoiding a harm and, as well, in which cases such interference is abusive of individuals self-determination. Into this analysis, the work will study the current concepts of paternalism, the theoretical classifications on paternalistic interventions which will be useful to demonstrate admissible and inadmissible species of paternalism and Joel Feinberg and Gerald Dworkin's anti- paternalistic theories. Following, this subject will be analyzed in association with the implications of juridical-criminal goods involved in conflicts between autonomy, human vulnerabilities and paternalism, specially regarding to the (un)availability of those goods. In the end, the work intends to define legitimation criteria for paternalistic interventions inserted in criminal laws, which superimpose themselves on the individual autonomy, in order to harmonize constitutional values of respect for autonomy, protection of vulnerable individuals and the Criminal Law functions of exclusive protection of juridical goods. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/36 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0065/2015.v1i1.36 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/36 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0065/2015.v1i1.36 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/36/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 112 - 143 2526-0065 2526-0065 reponame:Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais |
collection |
Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br || indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1836561943593222144 |