Export Ready — 

Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: de Araújo, Dalvaney Aparecida
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Doroteu, Junio César
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais
Download full: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/1449
Summary: The illegal evidence is a flagship in the law and their use is rejected on the constitutional text. The doctrine and jurisprudence study the institute enforcement mechanisms and in which cases would be appropriate to the use of theory. Analyzes the theory of illegal evidence, the principle proportionality and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in order to show that the sealing of the use of illegal evidence is limited both to public bodies responsible for criminal prosecution as well as to individuals. That by virtue of the guarantee fundamental rights and legal security measure. We used the deductive method.
id CONPEDI-39_3890daffd0acd79ff83577f077225b5e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1449
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-39
network_name_str Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais
repository_id_str
spelling Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings(In)Admissibilidadede Provas Ilícitas no Processo Penal: Um Estudo Sob a Ótica do Princípio da ProporcionalidadeIllicit evidence(In)admissibilityProportionality principleCriminal procedurPrivate.Prova ilícita(In)admissibilidadePrincípio da proporcionalidadeProcesso penalParticularThe illegal evidence is a flagship in the law and their use is rejected on the constitutional text. The doctrine and jurisprudence study the institute enforcement mechanisms and in which cases would be appropriate to the use of theory. Analyzes the theory of illegal evidence, the principle proportionality and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in order to show that the sealing of the use of illegal evidence is limited both to public bodies responsible for criminal prosecution as well as to individuals. That by virtue of the guarantee fundamental rights and legal security measure. We used the deductive method.A prova ilícita constitui uma emblemática no Direito e sua utilização é rechaçada na Constituição vigente. A doutrina e a jurisprudência estudam os mecanismos de aplicação do instituto e em quais casos seria adequado o emprego da teoria. Neste trabalho, analisa-se, à luz da jurisprudência do STF, a teoria das provas ilícitas e o princípio da proporcionalidade, buscando evidenciar que a vedação do uso das provas ilícitas limita-se tanto aos órgãos públicos incumbidos da persecução penal como também aos particulares. Isso em virtude da garantia dos direitos fundamentais e por medida de segurança jurídica. Utilizou-se no trabalho do método dedutivo.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-12-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/144910.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0065/2016.v2i2.1449Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais; v. 2 n. 2 (2016): Julho-Dezembro; 16-352526-00652526-0065reponame:Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminaisinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/1449/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Dalvaney Aparecida de Araújo, Junio César Doroteuinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Araújo, Dalvaney AparecidaDoroteu, Junio César2021-08-20T12:08:36Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1449Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/indexPRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br || indexlawjournals@gmail.com2526-00652526-0065opendoar:2021-08-20T12:08:36Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings
(In)Admissibilidadede Provas Ilícitas no Processo Penal: Um Estudo Sob a Ótica do Princípio da Proporcionalidade
title Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings
spellingShingle Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings
de Araújo, Dalvaney Aparecida
Illicit evidence
(In)admissibility
Proportionality principle
Criminal procedur
Private.
Prova ilícita
(In)admissibilidade
Princípio da proporcionalidade
Processo penal
Particular
title_short Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings
title_full Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings
title_fullStr Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings
title_full_unstemmed Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings
title_sort Principle of Proportionality X (In) Admissibility of Evidence Obtained by Unlawful Particular in Criminal Proceedings
author de Araújo, Dalvaney Aparecida
author_facet de Araújo, Dalvaney Aparecida
Doroteu, Junio César
author_role author
author2 Doroteu, Junio César
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Araújo, Dalvaney Aparecida
Doroteu, Junio César
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Illicit evidence
(In)admissibility
Proportionality principle
Criminal procedur
Private.
Prova ilícita
(In)admissibilidade
Princípio da proporcionalidade
Processo penal
Particular
topic Illicit evidence
(In)admissibility
Proportionality principle
Criminal procedur
Private.
Prova ilícita
(In)admissibilidade
Princípio da proporcionalidade
Processo penal
Particular
description The illegal evidence is a flagship in the law and their use is rejected on the constitutional text. The doctrine and jurisprudence study the institute enforcement mechanisms and in which cases would be appropriate to the use of theory. Analyzes the theory of illegal evidence, the principle proportionality and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in order to show that the sealing of the use of illegal evidence is limited both to public bodies responsible for criminal prosecution as well as to individuals. That by virtue of the guarantee fundamental rights and legal security measure. We used the deductive method.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/1449
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0065/2016.v2i2.1449
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/1449
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0065/2016.v2i2.1449
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistacpc/article/view/1449/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Dalvaney Aparecida de Araújo, Junio César Doroteu
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Dalvaney Aparecida de Araújo, Junio César Doroteu
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais; v. 2 n. 2 (2016): Julho-Dezembro; 16-35
2526-0065
2526-0065
reponame:Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais
collection Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Criminologias e Politicas Criminais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br || indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1836561943644602368

Similar Items