Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kato Lettieri, Gabriela
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Hung Tai, Aline, Rodrigues Hütter, Aline, Torres Raszl, André Luiz, Moura, Mariana, Barbosa Cintra, Raquel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
spa
Título da fonte: Revista Bioética (online)
Texto Completo: https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802
Resumo: The study analyzes confidentiality in the physician-patient relations, addressing how new technologies, such as social media, influence professional practice, and assessing the professionals’ knowledge regarding situations in which confidentiality can be broken without legal consequences. This crosssectional, quantitative and exploratory research took place between October and November 2019, involving 116 physicians who answered a structured questionnaire with 19 questions, among which five assessed knowledge on professional secrecy according to the Code of Medical Ethics and the Brazilian legal system. Physicians who answered three or more questions correctly were considered to have satisfactory knowledge on social media use and medical confidentiality (only 55.2% of respondents). Results reveal the importance of continuing medical education, especially regarding medical confidentiality.
id CFM-1_ecd3c1f1c77b9bd975ffffd4b8a0e931
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2802
network_acronym_str CFM-1
network_name_str Revista Bioética (online)
repository_id_str
spelling Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relationsConfidencialidad médica en la era digital: análisis de la relación médico-pacienteSigilo médico na era digital: análise da relação médico-pacienteConfidentiality. Bioethics. Social media.Confidencialidad. Bioética. Medios de comunicación sociales.Confidencialidade. Bioética. Mídias sociais.The study analyzes confidentiality in the physician-patient relations, addressing how new technologies, such as social media, influence professional practice, and assessing the professionals’ knowledge regarding situations in which confidentiality can be broken without legal consequences. This crosssectional, quantitative and exploratory research took place between October and November 2019, involving 116 physicians who answered a structured questionnaire with 19 questions, among which five assessed knowledge on professional secrecy according to the Code of Medical Ethics and the Brazilian legal system. Physicians who answered three or more questions correctly were considered to have satisfactory knowledge on social media use and medical confidentiality (only 55.2% of respondents). Results reveal the importance of continuing medical education, especially regarding medical confidentiality.El estudio analiza la confidencialidad en la relación médico-paciente, abordando la influencia de las nuevas tecnologías, como las redes sociales, en el ejercicio de la profesión, y midiendo el conocimiento de los profesionales sobre situaciones en las que la confidencialidad puede romperse sin consecuencias legales. Se trata de una investigación exploratoria, con enfoque cuantitativo y transversal, realizada entre octubre y noviembre de 2019, con 116 médicos, mediante un cuestionario estructurado con 19 preguntas, entre las que cinco evaluaron conocimientos sobre la confidencialidad profesional según el Código de Ética Médica. y el sistema legal brasileño. Se consideró que los médicos que respondieron correctamente a tres o más preguntas tenían un conocimiento satisfactorio sobre el uso de las redes sociales y la confidencialidad médica (solo el 55,2% de los encuestados). El resultado revela la importancia de la educación médica continua, especialmente en lo que respecta a la confidencialidad médica.O estudo analisa o sigilo na relação médico-paciente, abordando a influência de novas tecnologias, como as mídias sociais, no exercício da profissão, e aferindo o conhecimento de profissionais sobre situações em que o sigilo pode ser quebrado sem consequências legais. Trata-se de pesquisa de natureza exploratória, de abordagem quantitativa e corte transversal realizada entre outubro e novembro de 2019, com 116 médicos, por meio de questionário estruturado com 19 questões, entre as quais cinco avaliaram o conhecimento sobre sigilo profissional de acordo com o Código de Ética Médica e o ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Considerou-se que os médicos que responderam três ou mais questões corretamente apresentaram conhecimento satisfatório sobre o uso de mídias sociais e o sigilo médico (apenas 55,2% dos entrevistados). O resultado revela a importância da educação médica continuada, principalmente quanto ao sigilo médico.CFM2021-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesPesquisa de natureza exploratória, abordagem quantitativa e de corte transversal com análise a partir da Bioéticaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802Revista Bioética; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2021): Revista Bioética 29(4)Revista Bioética; Vol. 29 Núm. 4 (2021): Revista Bioética 29(4)Revista Bioética; v. 29 n. 4 (2021): Revista Bioética 29(4)1983-80341983-8042reponame:Revista Bioética (online)instname:Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)instacron:CFMporengspahttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802/2792https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802/2793https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802/2794Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Bioéticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKato Lettieri, GabrielaHung Tai, AlineRodrigues Hütter, AlineTorres Raszl, André LuizMoura, MarianaBarbosa Cintra, Raquel2021-12-14T17:22:09Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2802Revistahttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioeticaPUBhttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/oaibioetica@portalmedico.org.br||revistabioetica@gmail.com1983-80421983-8034opendoar:2021-12-14T17:22:09Revista Bioética (online) - Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relations
Confidencialidad médica en la era digital: análisis de la relación médico-paciente
Sigilo médico na era digital: análise da relação médico-paciente
title Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relations
spellingShingle Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relations
Kato Lettieri, Gabriela
Confidentiality. Bioethics. Social media.
Confidencialidad. Bioética. Medios de comunicación sociales.
Confidencialidade. Bioética. Mídias sociais.
title_short Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relations
title_full Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relations
title_fullStr Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relations
title_full_unstemmed Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relations
title_sort Medical confidentiality in the digital era: an analysis of physician-patient relations
author Kato Lettieri, Gabriela
author_facet Kato Lettieri, Gabriela
Hung Tai, Aline
Rodrigues Hütter, Aline
Torres Raszl, André Luiz
Moura, Mariana
Barbosa Cintra, Raquel
author_role author
author2 Hung Tai, Aline
Rodrigues Hütter, Aline
Torres Raszl, André Luiz
Moura, Mariana
Barbosa Cintra, Raquel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kato Lettieri, Gabriela
Hung Tai, Aline
Rodrigues Hütter, Aline
Torres Raszl, André Luiz
Moura, Mariana
Barbosa Cintra, Raquel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Confidentiality. Bioethics. Social media.
Confidencialidad. Bioética. Medios de comunicación sociales.
Confidencialidade. Bioética. Mídias sociais.
topic Confidentiality. Bioethics. Social media.
Confidencialidad. Bioética. Medios de comunicación sociales.
Confidencialidade. Bioética. Mídias sociais.
description The study analyzes confidentiality in the physician-patient relations, addressing how new technologies, such as social media, influence professional practice, and assessing the professionals’ knowledge regarding situations in which confidentiality can be broken without legal consequences. This crosssectional, quantitative and exploratory research took place between October and November 2019, involving 116 physicians who answered a structured questionnaire with 19 questions, among which five assessed knowledge on professional secrecy according to the Code of Medical Ethics and the Brazilian legal system. Physicians who answered three or more questions correctly were considered to have satisfactory knowledge on social media use and medical confidentiality (only 55.2% of respondents). Results reveal the importance of continuing medical education, especially regarding medical confidentiality.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
Pesquisa de natureza exploratória, abordagem quantitativa e de corte transversal com análise a partir da Bioética
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802
url https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
spa
language por
eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802/2792
https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802/2793
https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2802/2794
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Bioética
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Bioética
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv CFM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv CFM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Bioética; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2021): Revista Bioética 29(4)
Revista Bioética; Vol. 29 Núm. 4 (2021): Revista Bioética 29(4)
Revista Bioética; v. 29 n. 4 (2021): Revista Bioética 29(4)
1983-8034
1983-8042
reponame:Revista Bioética (online)
instname:Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)
instacron:CFM
instname_str Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)
instacron_str CFM
institution CFM
reponame_str Revista Bioética (online)
collection Revista Bioética (online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Bioética (online) - Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bioetica@portalmedico.org.br||revistabioetica@gmail.com
_version_ 1830213567579684864

Registros relacionados