The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limits
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Other Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | por eng spa |
| Source: | Revista Bioética (online) |
| Download full: | https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164 |
Summary: | The technological and scientific evolution has imposed challenges on society and especially on medicine. Changes in the doctor-patient relationship and among healthcare professionals require new regulatory formats to such relationships. The current Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics adopts the principialist NorthAmerican model as a universal ethical framework, based on autonomy that is out of step with the emerging bioethics in Latin America, whose theoretical assumptions on the plurality of moral subjects and multi-intertransdisciplinarityare oriented to public health and the defense of the most vulnerable. The text reflects on the historical aspects that organize professions and their codes, and on the reasons for the gap in the evolution of bioethics in Brazil and the revision of the code. Equally, the text considers the contemporary challenges tothe medical authority, which imposes the extension of the ethical debate to draft more democratic formats of professional codes, considering the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights as the structural axis. |
| id |
CFM-1_a9efd52780de98678c475147448f8b53 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1164 |
| network_acronym_str |
CFM-1 |
| network_name_str |
Revista Bioética (online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limitsCódigo de Ética Médica brasileño: límites deontológicos y bioéticosCódigo de Ética Médica brasileiro: limites deontológicos e bioéticosEthical theory. Codes of ethics. Ethicsmedical. Bioethics.Teoría ética. Códigos de ética. Ética médica. Bioética.Teoria ética. Códigos de ética. Ética médica. Bioética.The technological and scientific evolution has imposed challenges on society and especially on medicine. Changes in the doctor-patient relationship and among healthcare professionals require new regulatory formats to such relationships. The current Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics adopts the principialist NorthAmerican model as a universal ethical framework, based on autonomy that is out of step with the emerging bioethics in Latin America, whose theoretical assumptions on the plurality of moral subjects and multi-intertransdisciplinarityare oriented to public health and the defense of the most vulnerable. The text reflects on the historical aspects that organize professions and their codes, and on the reasons for the gap in the evolution of bioethics in Brazil and the revision of the code. Equally, the text considers the contemporary challenges tothe medical authority, which imposes the extension of the ethical debate to draft more democratic formats of professional codes, considering the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights as the structural axis.La evolución tecnológica y científica le ha impuesto retos a la sociedad y, en particular, a la medicina. Los cambios sociales en la relación médico-paciente y entre los profesionales de la salud requieren nuevos formatos regulatorios para estas relaciones. El actual Código de Ética Médica adopta el modelo norteamericano principialista como marco ético, universalista, basado en la autonomía, fuera de sintonía con la bioética latinoamericana emergente, que tiene como presupuestos teóricos la pluralidad de sujetos morales y las prácticasmulti, inter y transdisciplinarias orientadas a la salud pública y colectiva, y a la defensa de los más vulnerables. El texto reflexiona sobre los aspectos históricos configuradores de las profesiones y de sus códigos, sobre las razones de las diferencias en la evolución de la bioética en Brasil y de la revisión del código. Asimismo, reflexiona acerca de los desafíos contemporáneos del poder médico, que imponen la ampliación del debate ético para el desarrollo de formatos más democráticos de los códigos profesionales, basados en la Declaración Universalsobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos.A evolução tecnocientífica tem imposto desafios à sociedade e, particularmente, à medicina. Mudanças sociais nas relações médico-paciente e entre profissionais da saúde demandam novas formas de regulação dessas relações. O atual Código de Ética Médica adota o modelo principialista norte-americano como referencial ético, universalista, baseado na autonomia, em descompasso com a emergente bioética latino-americana, que tem como pressupostos teóricos a pluralidade dos sujeitos morais e a prática multi, inter e transdisciplinar, orientada para saúde pública e coletiva e defesa dos mais vulnerados. O texto reflete sobre aspectos históricos conformadores das profissões e seus códigos e as razões do descompasso da evolução da bioética no Brasil e da revisão do Código de Ética Médica. Igualmente, reflete sobre os desafios contemporâneos para o podermédico, que impõem ampliação do debate ético para elaboração de formatos mais democráticos dos códigos profissionais, tendo como eixo estruturante a Declaração Universal sobre Bioética e Direitos Humanos.CFM2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesPesquisa documental qualitativa com análise a partir da Bioéticaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164Revista Bioética; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2017): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2017; 25 (2)Revista Bioética; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2017): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2017; 25 (2)Revista Bioética; v. 25 n. 2 (2017): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2017; 25 (2)1983-80341983-8042reponame:Revista Bioética (online)instname:Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)instacron:CFMporengspahttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164/1651https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164/1652https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164/1653Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Bioéticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPassos Soares, Francisco JoseShimizu, Helena EriGarrafa, Volnei Santos2017-08-01T15:04:37Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1164Revistahttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioeticaPUBhttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/oaibioetica@portalmedico.org.br||revistabioetica@gmail.com1983-80421983-8034opendoar:2017-08-01T15:04:37Revista Bioética (online) - Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limits Código de Ética Médica brasileño: límites deontológicos y bioéticos Código de Ética Médica brasileiro: limites deontológicos e bioéticos |
| title |
The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limits |
| spellingShingle |
The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limits Passos Soares, Francisco Jose Ethical theory. Codes of ethics. Ethics medical. Bioethics. Teoría ética. Códigos de ética. Ética médica. Bioética. Teoria ética. Códigos de ética. Ética médica. Bioética. |
| title_short |
The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limits |
| title_full |
The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limits |
| title_fullStr |
The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limits |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limits |
| title_sort |
The Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics: Ethical and bioethical limits |
| author |
Passos Soares, Francisco Jose |
| author_facet |
Passos Soares, Francisco Jose Shimizu, Helena Eri Garrafa, Volnei Santos |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Shimizu, Helena Eri Garrafa, Volnei Santos |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Passos Soares, Francisco Jose Shimizu, Helena Eri Garrafa, Volnei Santos |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ethical theory. Codes of ethics. Ethics medical. Bioethics. Teoría ética. Códigos de ética. Ética médica. Bioética. Teoria ética. Códigos de ética. Ética médica. Bioética. |
| topic |
Ethical theory. Codes of ethics. Ethics medical. Bioethics. Teoría ética. Códigos de ética. Ética médica. Bioética. Teoria ética. Códigos de ética. Ética médica. Bioética. |
| description |
The technological and scientific evolution has imposed challenges on society and especially on medicine. Changes in the doctor-patient relationship and among healthcare professionals require new regulatory formats to such relationships. The current Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics adopts the principialist NorthAmerican model as a universal ethical framework, based on autonomy that is out of step with the emerging bioethics in Latin America, whose theoretical assumptions on the plurality of moral subjects and multi-intertransdisciplinarityare oriented to public health and the defense of the most vulnerable. The text reflects on the historical aspects that organize professions and their codes, and on the reasons for the gap in the evolution of bioethics in Brazil and the revision of the code. Equally, the text considers the contemporary challenges tothe medical authority, which imposes the extension of the ethical debate to draft more democratic formats of professional codes, considering the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights as the structural axis. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-01 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares Pesquisa documental qualitativa com análise a partir da Bioética |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164 |
| url |
https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng spa |
| language |
por eng spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164/1651 https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164/1652 https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1164/1653 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Bioética info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Bioética |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CFM |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CFM |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Bioética; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2017): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2017; 25 (2) Revista Bioética; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2017): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2017; 25 (2) Revista Bioética; v. 25 n. 2 (2017): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2017; 25 (2) 1983-8034 1983-8042 reponame:Revista Bioética (online) instname:Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM) instacron:CFM |
| instname_str |
Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM) |
| instacron_str |
CFM |
| institution |
CFM |
| reponame_str |
Revista Bioética (online) |
| collection |
Revista Bioética (online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Bioética (online) - Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bioetica@portalmedico.org.br||revistabioetica@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1830213565388161024 |