Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2015 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842015000100009 |
Summary: | Objective: The present study was aimed at evaluating the viability of replacing 18F with 99mTc in dose calibrator linearity testing. Materials and Methods: The test was performed with sources of 99mTc (62 GBq) and 18F (12 GBq) whose activities were measured up to values lower than 1 MBq. Ratios and deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were calculated and subsequently compared. Results: Mean deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were 0.56 (± 1.79)% and 0.92 (± 1.19)%, respectively. The mean ratio between activities indicated by the device for the 99mTc source as measured with the equipment pre-calibrated to measure 99mTc and 18F was 3.42 (± 0.06), and for the 18F source this ratio was 3.39 (± 0.05), values considered constant over the measurement time. Conclusion: The results of the linearity test using 99mTc were compatible with those obtained with the 18F source, indicating the viability of utilizing both radioisotopes in dose calibrator linearity testing. Such information in association with the high potential of radiation exposure and costs involved in 18F acquisition suggest 99mTc as the element of choice to perform dose calibrator linearity tests in centers that use 18F, without any detriment to the procedure as well as to the quality of the nuclear medicine service. |
id |
CBR-1_4643a16a4abe08fa5d154b93b230a51e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842015000100009 |
network_acronym_str |
CBR-1 |
network_name_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopesNuclear medicineDose calibratorLinearity testNuclear instrumentationMedicina nuclearMedidor de atividadeTeste de linearidadeInstrumentação nuclear Objective: The present study was aimed at evaluating the viability of replacing 18F with 99mTc in dose calibrator linearity testing. Materials and Methods: The test was performed with sources of 99mTc (62 GBq) and 18F (12 GBq) whose activities were measured up to values lower than 1 MBq. Ratios and deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were calculated and subsequently compared. Results: Mean deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were 0.56 (± 1.79)% and 0.92 (± 1.19)%, respectively. The mean ratio between activities indicated by the device for the 99mTc source as measured with the equipment pre-calibrated to measure 99mTc and 18F was 3.42 (± 0.06), and for the 18F source this ratio was 3.39 (± 0.05), values considered constant over the measurement time. Conclusion: The results of the linearity test using 99mTc were compatible with those obtained with the 18F source, indicating the viability of utilizing both radioisotopes in dose calibrator linearity testing. Such information in association with the high potential of radiation exposure and costs involved in 18F acquisition suggest 99mTc as the element of choice to perform dose calibrator linearity tests in centers that use 18F, without any detriment to the procedure as well as to the quality of the nuclear medicine service. Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842015000100009Radiologia Brasileira v.48 n.1 2015reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWillegaignon,JoséSapienza,Marcelo TatitCoura-Filho,George BarberioGarcez,Alexandre TelesAlves,Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez RibeiroCardona,Marissa Anabel RiveraGutterres,Ricardo FragaBuchpiguel,Carlos Albertoeng2015-04-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842015000100009Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2015-04-14T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes |
title |
Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes |
spellingShingle |
Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes Willegaignon,José Nuclear medicine Dose calibrator Linearity test Nuclear instrumentation Medicina nuclear Medidor de atividade Teste de linearidade Instrumentação nuclear |
title_short |
Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes |
title_full |
Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes |
title_fullStr |
Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes |
title_sort |
Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes |
author |
Willegaignon,José |
author_facet |
Willegaignon,José Sapienza,Marcelo Tatit Coura-Filho,George Barberio Garcez,Alexandre Teles Alves,Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez Ribeiro Cardona,Marissa Anabel Rivera Gutterres,Ricardo Fraga Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sapienza,Marcelo Tatit Coura-Filho,George Barberio Garcez,Alexandre Teles Alves,Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez Ribeiro Cardona,Marissa Anabel Rivera Gutterres,Ricardo Fraga Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Willegaignon,José Sapienza,Marcelo Tatit Coura-Filho,George Barberio Garcez,Alexandre Teles Alves,Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez Ribeiro Cardona,Marissa Anabel Rivera Gutterres,Ricardo Fraga Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nuclear medicine Dose calibrator Linearity test Nuclear instrumentation Medicina nuclear Medidor de atividade Teste de linearidade Instrumentação nuclear |
topic |
Nuclear medicine Dose calibrator Linearity test Nuclear instrumentation Medicina nuclear Medidor de atividade Teste de linearidade Instrumentação nuclear |
description |
Objective: The present study was aimed at evaluating the viability of replacing 18F with 99mTc in dose calibrator linearity testing. Materials and Methods: The test was performed with sources of 99mTc (62 GBq) and 18F (12 GBq) whose activities were measured up to values lower than 1 MBq. Ratios and deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were calculated and subsequently compared. Results: Mean deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were 0.56 (± 1.79)% and 0.92 (± 1.19)%, respectively. The mean ratio between activities indicated by the device for the 99mTc source as measured with the equipment pre-calibrated to measure 99mTc and 18F was 3.42 (± 0.06), and for the 18F source this ratio was 3.39 (± 0.05), values considered constant over the measurement time. Conclusion: The results of the linearity test using 99mTc were compatible with those obtained with the 18F source, indicating the viability of utilizing both radioisotopes in dose calibrator linearity testing. Such information in association with the high potential of radiation exposure and costs involved in 18F acquisition suggest 99mTc as the element of choice to perform dose calibrator linearity tests in centers that use 18F, without any detriment to the procedure as well as to the quality of the nuclear medicine service. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842015000100009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842015000100009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira v.48 n.1 2015 reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) instacron:CBR |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
instacron_str |
CBR |
institution |
CBR |
reponame_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208938858905600 |