Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Willegaignon,José
Publication Date: 2015
Other Authors: Sapienza,Marcelo Tatit, Coura-Filho,George Barberio, Garcez,Alexandre Teles, Alves,Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez Ribeiro, Cardona,Marissa Anabel Rivera, Gutterres,Ricardo Fraga, Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842015000100009
Summary: Objective: The present study was aimed at evaluating the viability of replacing 18F with 99mTc in dose calibrator linearity testing. Materials and Methods: The test was performed with sources of 99mTc (62 GBq) and 18F (12 GBq) whose activities were measured up to values lower than 1 MBq. Ratios and deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were calculated and subsequently compared. Results: Mean deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were 0.56 (± 1.79)% and 0.92 (± 1.19)%, respectively. The mean ratio between activities indicated by the device for the 99mTc source as measured with the equipment pre-calibrated to measure 99mTc and 18F was 3.42 (± 0.06), and for the 18F source this ratio was 3.39 (± 0.05), values considered constant over the measurement time. Conclusion: The results of the linearity test using 99mTc were compatible with those obtained with the 18F source, indicating the viability of utilizing both radioisotopes in dose calibrator linearity testing. Such information in association with the high potential of radiation exposure and costs involved in 18F acquisition suggest 99mTc as the element of choice to perform dose calibrator linearity tests in centers that use 18F, without any detriment to the procedure as well as to the quality of the nuclear medicine service.
id CBR-1_4643a16a4abe08fa5d154b93b230a51e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-39842015000100009
network_acronym_str CBR-1
network_name_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopesNuclear medicineDose calibratorLinearity testNuclear instrumentationMedicina nuclearMedidor de atividadeTeste de linearidadeInstrumentação nuclear Objective: The present study was aimed at evaluating the viability of replacing 18F with 99mTc in dose calibrator linearity testing. Materials and Methods: The test was performed with sources of 99mTc (62 GBq) and 18F (12 GBq) whose activities were measured up to values lower than 1 MBq. Ratios and deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were calculated and subsequently compared. Results: Mean deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were 0.56 (± 1.79)% and 0.92 (± 1.19)%, respectively. The mean ratio between activities indicated by the device for the 99mTc source as measured with the equipment pre-calibrated to measure 99mTc and 18F was 3.42 (± 0.06), and for the 18F source this ratio was 3.39 (± 0.05), values considered constant over the measurement time. Conclusion: The results of the linearity test using 99mTc were compatible with those obtained with the 18F source, indicating the viability of utilizing both radioisotopes in dose calibrator linearity testing. Such information in association with the high potential of radiation exposure and costs involved in 18F acquisition suggest 99mTc as the element of choice to perform dose calibrator linearity tests in centers that use 18F, without any detriment to the procedure as well as to the quality of the nuclear medicine service. Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842015000100009Radiologia Brasileira v.48 n.1 2015reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWillegaignon,JoséSapienza,Marcelo TatitCoura-Filho,George BarberioGarcez,Alexandre TelesAlves,Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez RibeiroCardona,Marissa Anabel RiveraGutterres,Ricardo FragaBuchpiguel,Carlos Albertoeng2015-04-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842015000100009Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2015-04-14T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes
title Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes
spellingShingle Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes
Willegaignon,José
Nuclear medicine
Dose calibrator
Linearity test
Nuclear instrumentation
Medicina nuclear
Medidor de atividade
Teste de linearidade
Instrumentação nuclear
title_short Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes
title_full Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes
title_fullStr Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes
title_full_unstemmed Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes
title_sort Dose calibrator linearity test: 99mTc versus 18F radioisotopes
author Willegaignon,José
author_facet Willegaignon,José
Sapienza,Marcelo Tatit
Coura-Filho,George Barberio
Garcez,Alexandre Teles
Alves,Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez Ribeiro
Cardona,Marissa Anabel Rivera
Gutterres,Ricardo Fraga
Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto
author_role author
author2 Sapienza,Marcelo Tatit
Coura-Filho,George Barberio
Garcez,Alexandre Teles
Alves,Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez Ribeiro
Cardona,Marissa Anabel Rivera
Gutterres,Ricardo Fraga
Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Willegaignon,José
Sapienza,Marcelo Tatit
Coura-Filho,George Barberio
Garcez,Alexandre Teles
Alves,Carlos Eduardo Gonzalez Ribeiro
Cardona,Marissa Anabel Rivera
Gutterres,Ricardo Fraga
Buchpiguel,Carlos Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nuclear medicine
Dose calibrator
Linearity test
Nuclear instrumentation
Medicina nuclear
Medidor de atividade
Teste de linearidade
Instrumentação nuclear
topic Nuclear medicine
Dose calibrator
Linearity test
Nuclear instrumentation
Medicina nuclear
Medidor de atividade
Teste de linearidade
Instrumentação nuclear
description Objective: The present study was aimed at evaluating the viability of replacing 18F with 99mTc in dose calibrator linearity testing. Materials and Methods: The test was performed with sources of 99mTc (62 GBq) and 18F (12 GBq) whose activities were measured up to values lower than 1 MBq. Ratios and deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were calculated and subsequently compared. Results: Mean deviations between experimental and theoretical 99mTc and 18F sources activities were 0.56 (± 1.79)% and 0.92 (± 1.19)%, respectively. The mean ratio between activities indicated by the device for the 99mTc source as measured with the equipment pre-calibrated to measure 99mTc and 18F was 3.42 (± 0.06), and for the 18F source this ratio was 3.39 (± 0.05), values considered constant over the measurement time. Conclusion: The results of the linearity test using 99mTc were compatible with those obtained with the 18F source, indicating the viability of utilizing both radioisotopes in dose calibrator linearity testing. Such information in association with the high potential of radiation exposure and costs involved in 18F acquisition suggest 99mTc as the element of choice to perform dose calibrator linearity tests in centers that use 18F, without any detriment to the procedure as well as to the quality of the nuclear medicine service.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842015000100009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842015000100009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0018
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira v.48 n.1 2015
reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron:CBR
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron_str CBR
institution CBR
reponame_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
collection Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br
_version_ 1754208938858905600