Export Ready — 

When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Costa,Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
Publication Date: 2013
Other Authors: Salvadori,Priscila Silveira, Monjardim,Rodrigo da Fonseca, Bretas,Elisa Almeida Sathler, Torres,Lucas Rios, Caldana,Rogerio Pedreschi, Shigueoka,David Carlos, Medeiros,Regina Bitelli, D'ippolito,Giuseppe
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842013000400197
Summary: Objective: To evaluate the necessity of the non contrast-enhanced phase in abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was developed, evaluating 244 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans both with and without contrast injection. Initially, the contrast-enhanced images were analyzed (first analysis). Subsequently, the observers had access to the non-contrast-enhanced images for a second analysis. The primary and secondary diagnoses were established as a function of the clinical indications for each study (such as tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation for abdominal collection and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others). Finally, the changes in the diagnoses resulting from the addition of the non-contrast-enhanced phase were evaluated. Results: Only one (0.4%; p > 0.999; non-statistically significant) out of the 244 reviewed cases had the diagnosis changed after the reading of non-contrast-enhanced images. As the secondary diagnoses are considered, 35 (14%) cases presented changes after the second analysis, as follows: nephrolithiasis (10%), steatosis (3%), adrenal nodule (0.7%) and cholelithiasis (0.3%). Conclusion: For the clinical indications of tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation of abdominal collections and hepatocellular carcinoma, the non-contrast-enhanced phase can be excluded from abdominal computed tomography studies with no significant impact on the diagnosis.
id CBR-1_2c4d0f2d9dcacf0b67cd90ac8fa2b69b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-39842013000400197
network_acronym_str CBR-1
network_name_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 casesComputed tomographyIonizing radiationAbdomenContrast media Objective: To evaluate the necessity of the non contrast-enhanced phase in abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was developed, evaluating 244 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans both with and without contrast injection. Initially, the contrast-enhanced images were analyzed (first analysis). Subsequently, the observers had access to the non-contrast-enhanced images for a second analysis. The primary and secondary diagnoses were established as a function of the clinical indications for each study (such as tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation for abdominal collection and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others). Finally, the changes in the diagnoses resulting from the addition of the non-contrast-enhanced phase were evaluated. Results: Only one (0.4%; p > 0.999; non-statistically significant) out of the 244 reviewed cases had the diagnosis changed after the reading of non-contrast-enhanced images. As the secondary diagnoses are considered, 35 (14%) cases presented changes after the second analysis, as follows: nephrolithiasis (10%), steatosis (3%), adrenal nodule (0.7%) and cholelithiasis (0.3%). Conclusion: For the clinical indications of tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation of abdominal collections and hepatocellular carcinoma, the non-contrast-enhanced phase can be excluded from abdominal computed tomography studies with no significant impact on the diagnosis. Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2013-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842013000400197Radiologia Brasileira v.46 n.4 2013reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta,Danilo Manuel CerqueiraSalvadori,Priscila SilveiraMonjardim,Rodrigo da FonsecaBretas,Elisa Almeida SathlerTorres,Lucas RiosCaldana,Rogerio PedreschiShigueoka,David CarlosMedeiros,Regina BitelliD'ippolito,Giuseppeeng2015-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842013000400197Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2015-09-03T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
title When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
spellingShingle When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
Costa,Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
Computed tomography
Ionizing radiation
Abdomen
Contrast media
title_short When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
title_full When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
title_fullStr When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
title_full_unstemmed When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
title_sort When the non-contrast-enhanced phase is unnecessary in abdominal computed tomography scans? A retrospective analysis of 244 cases
author Costa,Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
author_facet Costa,Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
Salvadori,Priscila Silveira
Monjardim,Rodrigo da Fonseca
Bretas,Elisa Almeida Sathler
Torres,Lucas Rios
Caldana,Rogerio Pedreschi
Shigueoka,David Carlos
Medeiros,Regina Bitelli
D'ippolito,Giuseppe
author_role author
author2 Salvadori,Priscila Silveira
Monjardim,Rodrigo da Fonseca
Bretas,Elisa Almeida Sathler
Torres,Lucas Rios
Caldana,Rogerio Pedreschi
Shigueoka,David Carlos
Medeiros,Regina Bitelli
D'ippolito,Giuseppe
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa,Danilo Manuel Cerqueira
Salvadori,Priscila Silveira
Monjardim,Rodrigo da Fonseca
Bretas,Elisa Almeida Sathler
Torres,Lucas Rios
Caldana,Rogerio Pedreschi
Shigueoka,David Carlos
Medeiros,Regina Bitelli
D'ippolito,Giuseppe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Computed tomography
Ionizing radiation
Abdomen
Contrast media
topic Computed tomography
Ionizing radiation
Abdomen
Contrast media
description Objective: To evaluate the necessity of the non contrast-enhanced phase in abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study was developed, evaluating 244 consecutive abdominal computed tomography scans both with and without contrast injection. Initially, the contrast-enhanced images were analyzed (first analysis). Subsequently, the observers had access to the non-contrast-enhanced images for a second analysis. The primary and secondary diagnoses were established as a function of the clinical indications for each study (such as tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation for abdominal collection and hepatocellular carcinoma, among others). Finally, the changes in the diagnoses resulting from the addition of the non-contrast-enhanced phase were evaluated. Results: Only one (0.4%; p > 0.999; non-statistically significant) out of the 244 reviewed cases had the diagnosis changed after the reading of non-contrast-enhanced images. As the secondary diagnoses are considered, 35 (14%) cases presented changes after the second analysis, as follows: nephrolithiasis (10%), steatosis (3%), adrenal nodule (0.7%) and cholelithiasis (0.3%). Conclusion: For the clinical indications of tumor staging, acute abdomen, investigation of abdominal collections and hepatocellular carcinoma, the non-contrast-enhanced phase can be excluded from abdominal computed tomography studies with no significant impact on the diagnosis.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842013000400197
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842013000400197
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-39842013000400004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira v.46 n.4 2013
reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron:CBR
instname_str Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
instacron_str CBR
institution CBR
reponame_str Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
collection Radiologia Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br
_version_ 1754208938452058112