A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Karadag,Remzi
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Sevimli,Neslihan, Okumus,Seydi, Ozsoy,Isilay, Bayramlar,Huseyin, Durucu,Ela, Aksoy,Umit, Rapuano,Christopher J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492017000600373
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare the effects of 90° and 180° conjunctival rotational autograft (CRA) techniques used in primary pterygium surgery. Methods: Forty-five patients were included in this retrospective study. Visual acuity (VA), corneal topography, and auto-refractometer measurements, as well as detailed biomicroscopic examinations, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. During surgery, the pterygium tissue was excised then rotated 90° in Group 1 and180° in Group 2, after which it was sutured to the bare sclera. Pterygium recurrence was defined as corneal invasion ≥1 mm. Results: Group 1 consisted of 21 patients with a mean age of 45.1 ± 11.8 years, while Group 2 comprised 24 patients with a mean age of 47.9 ± 13.8 years. The pterygia in Group 1 were graded as more advanced than those in Group 2. A similar number of recurrences were observed in Group 1 (14.3%) and in Group 2 (16.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the preoperative and postoperative VA and astigmatism values between the two groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in the postoperative VA and astigmatism values in Group 1 and in the postoperative astigmatism values in Group 2. Although postoperative redness was more common in Group 1, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion: BothCRA techniques can be successful in patients for whom it is desirable to avoid a conjunctival autograft and for patients without high cosmetic expectations.
id CBO-2_c6ef3e4194eeac0c28556069efc0f0ab
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-27492017000600373
network_acronym_str CBO-2
network_name_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgeryAutograftsConjunctiva/transplantationPterygium/surgeryTransplantationautologous/methodsABSTRACT Purpose: To compare the effects of 90° and 180° conjunctival rotational autograft (CRA) techniques used in primary pterygium surgery. Methods: Forty-five patients were included in this retrospective study. Visual acuity (VA), corneal topography, and auto-refractometer measurements, as well as detailed biomicroscopic examinations, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. During surgery, the pterygium tissue was excised then rotated 90° in Group 1 and180° in Group 2, after which it was sutured to the bare sclera. Pterygium recurrence was defined as corneal invasion ≥1 mm. Results: Group 1 consisted of 21 patients with a mean age of 45.1 ± 11.8 years, while Group 2 comprised 24 patients with a mean age of 47.9 ± 13.8 years. The pterygia in Group 1 were graded as more advanced than those in Group 2. A similar number of recurrences were observed in Group 1 (14.3%) and in Group 2 (16.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the preoperative and postoperative VA and astigmatism values between the two groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in the postoperative VA and astigmatism values in Group 1 and in the postoperative astigmatism values in Group 2. Although postoperative redness was more common in Group 1, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion: BothCRA techniques can be successful in patients for whom it is desirable to avoid a conjunctival autograft and for patients without high cosmetic expectations.Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492017000600373Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.80 n.6 2017reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)instacron:CBO10.5935/0004-2749.20170091info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKaradag,RemziSevimli,NeslihanOkumus,SeydiOzsoy,IsilayBayramlar,HuseyinDurucu,ElaAksoy,UmitRapuano,Christopher J.eng2017-12-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-27492017000600373Revistahttp://aboonline.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpaboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br1678-29250004-2749opendoar:2017-12-11T00:00Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
title A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
spellingShingle A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
Karadag,Remzi
Autografts
Conjunctiva/transplantation
Pterygium/surgery
Transplantation
autologous/methods
title_short A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
title_full A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
title_fullStr A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
title_sort A comparison of two conjunctival rotation autograft techniques in primary pterygium surgery
author Karadag,Remzi
author_facet Karadag,Remzi
Sevimli,Neslihan
Okumus,Seydi
Ozsoy,Isilay
Bayramlar,Huseyin
Durucu,Ela
Aksoy,Umit
Rapuano,Christopher J.
author_role author
author2 Sevimli,Neslihan
Okumus,Seydi
Ozsoy,Isilay
Bayramlar,Huseyin
Durucu,Ela
Aksoy,Umit
Rapuano,Christopher J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Karadag,Remzi
Sevimli,Neslihan
Okumus,Seydi
Ozsoy,Isilay
Bayramlar,Huseyin
Durucu,Ela
Aksoy,Umit
Rapuano,Christopher J.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Autografts
Conjunctiva/transplantation
Pterygium/surgery
Transplantation
autologous/methods
topic Autografts
Conjunctiva/transplantation
Pterygium/surgery
Transplantation
autologous/methods
description ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare the effects of 90° and 180° conjunctival rotational autograft (CRA) techniques used in primary pterygium surgery. Methods: Forty-five patients were included in this retrospective study. Visual acuity (VA), corneal topography, and auto-refractometer measurements, as well as detailed biomicroscopic examinations, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. During surgery, the pterygium tissue was excised then rotated 90° in Group 1 and180° in Group 2, after which it was sutured to the bare sclera. Pterygium recurrence was defined as corneal invasion ≥1 mm. Results: Group 1 consisted of 21 patients with a mean age of 45.1 ± 11.8 years, while Group 2 comprised 24 patients with a mean age of 47.9 ± 13.8 years. The pterygia in Group 1 were graded as more advanced than those in Group 2. A similar number of recurrences were observed in Group 1 (14.3%) and in Group 2 (16.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the preoperative and postoperative VA and astigmatism values between the two groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in the postoperative VA and astigmatism values in Group 1 and in the postoperative astigmatism values in Group 2. Although postoperative redness was more common in Group 1, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion: BothCRA techniques can be successful in patients for whom it is desirable to avoid a conjunctival autograft and for patients without high cosmetic expectations.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492017000600373
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-27492017000600373
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/0004-2749.20170091
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia v.80 n.6 2017
reponame:Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
instname:Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron:CBO
instname_str Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
instacron_str CBO
institution CBO
reponame_str Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
collection Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia (Online) - Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aboonline@cbo.com.br||abo@cbo.com.br
_version_ 1754209029522980864