Bioterrorism: empower to respond
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Saude em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/2641 |
Resumo: | The use of biological agents for the purpose of terrorizing enemies dates back many centuries. This terror action with the use of biological agents became popularized as Bioterrorism. Bioterrorist attacks are dangerous due to various factors involved, such as the silent way in which it may occur, or the type of biological agent that can be used depending on the purpose of the attack. To prevent contamination by these agents, the professionals who will act to combat these events should have knowledge about the varieties of mechanisms of actions and dissemination of the pathogens, as well the best way to neutralize and eliminate them; besides, they should have known how to choose appropriates protection equipment, both for individual and collective protection. Thus, it is necessary that such action teams be well empowered and trained. The purpose of this paper is to analyze, in the existing literature, what are the training modes in the world for first responders to attacks involving Chemical, Biological, Radiological or Nuclear (CBRN) agents. It is concluded that studies in this field are minimals and that more research and training for this kind of event should be carried out worldwide. |
id |
CBES-1_c6e213ca1b0d6644a498bfd320fe42d1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.saudeemdebate.emnuvens.com.br:article/2641 |
network_acronym_str |
CBES-1 |
network_name_str |
Saude em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bioterrorism: empower to respondBioterrorismo: capacitar para responderBioterrorismo. Biossegurança. Bombeiros.Bioterrorism. Biosafety. Firefighters.The use of biological agents for the purpose of terrorizing enemies dates back many centuries. This terror action with the use of biological agents became popularized as Bioterrorism. Bioterrorist attacks are dangerous due to various factors involved, such as the silent way in which it may occur, or the type of biological agent that can be used depending on the purpose of the attack. To prevent contamination by these agents, the professionals who will act to combat these events should have knowledge about the varieties of mechanisms of actions and dissemination of the pathogens, as well the best way to neutralize and eliminate them; besides, they should have known how to choose appropriates protection equipment, both for individual and collective protection. Thus, it is necessary that such action teams be well empowered and trained. The purpose of this paper is to analyze, in the existing literature, what are the training modes in the world for first responders to attacks involving Chemical, Biological, Radiological or Nuclear (CBRN) agents. It is concluded that studies in this field are minimals and that more research and training for this kind of event should be carried out worldwide.A utilização de agentes biológicos com a finalidade de aterrorizar inimigos surgiu há muitos séculos. Essa ação foi popularizada como bioterrorismo. Ataques bioterroristas são perigosos devido ao envolvimento de diversos fatores, como a forma silenciosa na qual pode ocorrer, o tipo e a forma de transmissão do agente biológico utilizado, dependendo do objetivo do ataque. Para prevenção da contaminação por esses agentes, os profissionais que irão atuar no seu combate devem possuir conhecimentos a respeito dos mecanismos de ação e de disseminação desses patógenos, bem como a adequada forma de sua neutralização e eliminação; além de saber escolher os equipamentos de proteção, tanto de uso individual quanto coletivo, adequados. Diante disso, tais equipes de ação necessitam ser bem capacitadas e treinadas. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar, na literatura, os modos de treinamentos existentes no mundo para os profissionais de primeira resposta aos ataques envolvendo agentes Químico, Biológico, Radiológico ou Nuclear (QBRN). A partir de uma revisão integrativa, encontraram-se três artigos, em um período de 20 anos. Conclui-se que são muito escassos os estudos nessa área e que mais pesquisas e treinamentos para este tipo de evento devem ser realizados no mundo inteiro.Maria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto2019-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/2641Saúde em Debate; Vol. 43 No. especial 3 dez (2019): Saneamento e saúde ambiental; 181-189Saúde em Debate; Vol. 43 Núm. especial 3 dez (2019): Saneamento e saúde ambiental; 181-189Saúde em Debate; v. 43 n. especial 3 dez (2019): Saneamento e saúde ambiental; 181-1892358-28980103-1104reponame:Saude em Debateinstname:Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saudeinstacron:CBESporhttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/2641/918Copyright (c) 2022 Saúde em Debatehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAzevedo, Ana Paula Chein Bueno deCohen, Simone CynamonCardoso, Telma Abdalla Oliveira de2022-08-30T04:27:37Zoai:ojs.saudeemdebate.emnuvens.com.br:article/2641Revistahttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/ONGhttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/oairevista@saudeemdebate.org.br2358-28980103-1104opendoar:2025-02-17T13:19:33.745648Saude em Debate - Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saudefalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioterrorism: empower to respond Bioterrorismo: capacitar para responder |
title |
Bioterrorism: empower to respond |
spellingShingle |
Bioterrorism: empower to respond Azevedo, Ana Paula Chein Bueno de Bioterrorismo. Biossegurança. Bombeiros. Bioterrorism. Biosafety. Firefighters. |
title_short |
Bioterrorism: empower to respond |
title_full |
Bioterrorism: empower to respond |
title_fullStr |
Bioterrorism: empower to respond |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bioterrorism: empower to respond |
title_sort |
Bioterrorism: empower to respond |
author |
Azevedo, Ana Paula Chein Bueno de |
author_facet |
Azevedo, Ana Paula Chein Bueno de Cohen, Simone Cynamon Cardoso, Telma Abdalla Oliveira de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cohen, Simone Cynamon Cardoso, Telma Abdalla Oliveira de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Azevedo, Ana Paula Chein Bueno de Cohen, Simone Cynamon Cardoso, Telma Abdalla Oliveira de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bioterrorismo. Biossegurança. Bombeiros. Bioterrorism. Biosafety. Firefighters. |
topic |
Bioterrorismo. Biossegurança. Bombeiros. Bioterrorism. Biosafety. Firefighters. |
description |
The use of biological agents for the purpose of terrorizing enemies dates back many centuries. This terror action with the use of biological agents became popularized as Bioterrorism. Bioterrorist attacks are dangerous due to various factors involved, such as the silent way in which it may occur, or the type of biological agent that can be used depending on the purpose of the attack. To prevent contamination by these agents, the professionals who will act to combat these events should have knowledge about the varieties of mechanisms of actions and dissemination of the pathogens, as well the best way to neutralize and eliminate them; besides, they should have known how to choose appropriates protection equipment, both for individual and collective protection. Thus, it is necessary that such action teams be well empowered and trained. The purpose of this paper is to analyze, in the existing literature, what are the training modes in the world for first responders to attacks involving Chemical, Biological, Radiological or Nuclear (CBRN) agents. It is concluded that studies in this field are minimals and that more research and training for this kind of event should be carried out worldwide. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/2641 |
url |
https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/2641 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/2641/918 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Saúde em Debate http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Saúde em Debate http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Maria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Maria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Saúde em Debate; Vol. 43 No. especial 3 dez (2019): Saneamento e saúde ambiental; 181-189 Saúde em Debate; Vol. 43 Núm. especial 3 dez (2019): Saneamento e saúde ambiental; 181-189 Saúde em Debate; v. 43 n. especial 3 dez (2019): Saneamento e saúde ambiental; 181-189 2358-2898 0103-1104 reponame:Saude em Debate instname:Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude instacron:CBES |
instname_str |
Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude |
instacron_str |
CBES |
institution |
CBES |
reponame_str |
Saude em Debate |
collection |
Saude em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Saude em Debate - Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@saudeemdebate.org.br |
_version_ |
1824322519529684992 |