Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por eng |
Source: | Saude em Debate |
Download full: | https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/7289 |
Summary: | This essay discusses participative governance mechanisms in the public sector grounded on theories of civil liberties, dialogical democracies, patterns of state bureaucracies, and public governance reforms. We aimed to analyze the effects of these issues on political agendas and public and participative governance alternatives in Brazil, emphasizing conflicts among rulers, politicians, civil servants, interest groups, and advocacy coalitions in dispute in decision-making processes. The article signals a hybrid nature of the Brazilian democracy in which Weberian universalism and rules of Welfare State institutions inscribed in the 1988 constitutional matrix operate through competition between two other logic streams – strata inheritance of state bureaucracy on the one hand and initiatives in favor of horizontal and participative governance on the other. The article signals for a hybrid character of Brazilian democracy where Weberian universalism and rules of Welfare State institutions inscribed in 1988 constitutional operates through competition between two logics – stratum inheritance of state bureaucracy in one side, and initiatives in favor of horizontal and participative governances to the other side. Dynamic contradictions among these for issues will define the pattern of present competition for State apparatus. |
id |
CBES-1_3db09b8dc9725f8b64ffb2c7311b7248 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.saudeemdebate.emnuvens.com.br:article/7289 |
network_acronym_str |
CBES-1 |
network_name_str |
Saude em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosityMecanismos de governança, instituições societárias e burocracia estatal: reflexões sobre instituições societárias e porosidade governamentalGovernança. Burocracia estatal. Participação societária.Governance. State bureaucracy. Societal institutions.This essay discusses participative governance mechanisms in the public sector grounded on theories of civil liberties, dialogical democracies, patterns of state bureaucracies, and public governance reforms. We aimed to analyze the effects of these issues on political agendas and public and participative governance alternatives in Brazil, emphasizing conflicts among rulers, politicians, civil servants, interest groups, and advocacy coalitions in dispute in decision-making processes. The article signals a hybrid nature of the Brazilian democracy in which Weberian universalism and rules of Welfare State institutions inscribed in the 1988 constitutional matrix operate through competition between two other logic streams – strata inheritance of state bureaucracy on the one hand and initiatives in favor of horizontal and participative governance on the other. The article signals for a hybrid character of Brazilian democracy where Weberian universalism and rules of Welfare State institutions inscribed in 1988 constitutional operates through competition between two logics – stratum inheritance of state bureaucracy in one side, and initiatives in favor of horizontal and participative governances to the other side. Dynamic contradictions among these for issues will define the pattern of present competition for State apparatus. Este ensaio discute os mecanismos de governança participativa no setor público a partir de teorias sobre liberdades civis, democracias dialógicas, formações burocráticas estatais e reformas de governança pública. O objetivo é analisar a repercussão destes temas em agendas e alternativas de políticas de governança pública e participativa no Brasil com ênfase nos conflitos entre governantes, políticos, funcionários, grupos de interesses e coalizões civis em disputa nos processos decisórios. O artigo assinala o caráter híbrido da democracia brasileira, onde o universalismo weberiano e a orientação às instituições de Estado de Bem-estar que foram entrelaçados na matriz constitucional de 1988 operam em competição com duas outras lógicas - a herança estamental da burocracia pública, por um lado, e iniciativas de governanças horizontais e participativas, por outro. As contradições dinâmicas entre estes quatro eixos definirão a competição pelo aparelho de Estado no contexto atual. Palavras-chave: Governança; Burocracia Estatal; Participação SocietáriaMaria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto2023-06-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/7289Saúde em Debate; Vol. 46 No. especial 4 nov (2022): Institutional accreditation in SUS ombudsmen and participation of society; 66-80Saúde em Debate; Vol. 46 Núm. especial 4 nov (2022): Acreditação institucional em ouvidorias do SUS e participação da sociedade; 66-80Saúde em Debate; v. 46 n. especial 4 nov (2022): Acreditação institucional em ouvidorias do SUS e participação da sociedade; 66-802358-28980103-1104reponame:Saude em Debateinstname:Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saudeinstacron:CBESporenghttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/7289/1630https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/7289/1632Copyright (c) 2023 Saúde em Debatehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, José Mendes 2023-06-24T23:43:45Zoai:ojs.saudeemdebate.emnuvens.com.br:article/7289Revistahttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/ONGhttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/oairevista@saudeemdebate.org.br2358-28980103-1104opendoar:2025-02-17T13:20:03.460983Saude em Debate - Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saudefalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity Mecanismos de governança, instituições societárias e burocracia estatal: reflexões sobre instituições societárias e porosidade governamental |
title |
Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity |
spellingShingle |
Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity Ribeiro, José Mendes Governança. Burocracia estatal. Participação societária. Governance. State bureaucracy. Societal institutions. |
title_short |
Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity |
title_full |
Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity |
title_fullStr |
Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity |
title_sort |
Governance mechanisms, societal institutions, and State bureaucracy: concerns over societal institutions and governmental porosity |
author |
Ribeiro, José Mendes |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, José Mendes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, José Mendes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Governança. Burocracia estatal. Participação societária. Governance. State bureaucracy. Societal institutions. |
topic |
Governança. Burocracia estatal. Participação societária. Governance. State bureaucracy. Societal institutions. |
description |
This essay discusses participative governance mechanisms in the public sector grounded on theories of civil liberties, dialogical democracies, patterns of state bureaucracies, and public governance reforms. We aimed to analyze the effects of these issues on political agendas and public and participative governance alternatives in Brazil, emphasizing conflicts among rulers, politicians, civil servants, interest groups, and advocacy coalitions in dispute in decision-making processes. The article signals a hybrid nature of the Brazilian democracy in which Weberian universalism and rules of Welfare State institutions inscribed in the 1988 constitutional matrix operate through competition between two other logic streams – strata inheritance of state bureaucracy on the one hand and initiatives in favor of horizontal and participative governance on the other. The article signals for a hybrid character of Brazilian democracy where Weberian universalism and rules of Welfare State institutions inscribed in 1988 constitutional operates through competition between two logics – stratum inheritance of state bureaucracy in one side, and initiatives in favor of horizontal and participative governances to the other side. Dynamic contradictions among these for issues will define the pattern of present competition for State apparatus. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/7289 |
url |
https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/7289 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/7289/1630 https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/7289/1632 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Saúde em Debate http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Saúde em Debate http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Maria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Maria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Saúde em Debate; Vol. 46 No. especial 4 nov (2022): Institutional accreditation in SUS ombudsmen and participation of society; 66-80 Saúde em Debate; Vol. 46 Núm. especial 4 nov (2022): Acreditação institucional em ouvidorias do SUS e participação da sociedade; 66-80 Saúde em Debate; v. 46 n. especial 4 nov (2022): Acreditação institucional em ouvidorias do SUS e participação da sociedade; 66-80 2358-2898 0103-1104 reponame:Saude em Debate instname:Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude instacron:CBES |
instname_str |
Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude |
instacron_str |
CBES |
institution |
CBES |
reponame_str |
Saude em Debate |
collection |
Saude em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Saude em Debate - Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@saudeemdebate.org.br |
_version_ |
1824322522739376128 |