ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use?
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
| Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022000801059 |
Summary: | SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the agreement in the indication of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, as per the 2014 European Society of Cardiology and 2020 American Heart Association recommendations, and evaluate fragmented QRS as a predictor of cardiovascular outcome. METHODS: Retrospective cohort with 81 patients was evaluated between 2019 and 2021. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ≥16 years old were included. Exclusion criteria include secondary myocardiopathy and follow-up <1 year. Kappa coefficient was used to determine the agreement. Survival and incidence curves were determined by Kaplan-Meier method. A p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The fragmented QRS was identified in 44.4% of patients. There were no differences between patients with and without fragmented QRS regarding clinical parameters, echocardiography, fibrosis, and sudden cardiac death risk. During follow-up of 4.8±3.4 years, there was no sudden cardiac death, but 20.6% patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator had at least one appropriate shock. Three of the seven appropriate shocks occurred in European Society of Cardiology low- to moderate-risk patients. Three shocks occurred in moderate-risk patients and four in American Heart Association high-risk patients. Overall recommendations agreement was 64% with a kappa of 0.270 (p=0.007). C-statistic showed no differences regarding the incidence of appropriate shock (p=0.644). CONCLUSION: sudden cardiac death risk stratification algorithms present discrepancies in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication, both with low accuracy. |
| id |
AMB-1_cc9fdb310ad4c505700909eb779a1d2d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-42302022000801059 |
| network_acronym_str |
AMB-1 |
| network_name_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use?Sudden cardiac deathHypertrophic cardiomyopathyImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorCardiac arrhythmiaSUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the agreement in the indication of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, as per the 2014 European Society of Cardiology and 2020 American Heart Association recommendations, and evaluate fragmented QRS as a predictor of cardiovascular outcome. METHODS: Retrospective cohort with 81 patients was evaluated between 2019 and 2021. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ≥16 years old were included. Exclusion criteria include secondary myocardiopathy and follow-up <1 year. Kappa coefficient was used to determine the agreement. Survival and incidence curves were determined by Kaplan-Meier method. A p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The fragmented QRS was identified in 44.4% of patients. There were no differences between patients with and without fragmented QRS regarding clinical parameters, echocardiography, fibrosis, and sudden cardiac death risk. During follow-up of 4.8±3.4 years, there was no sudden cardiac death, but 20.6% patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator had at least one appropriate shock. Three of the seven appropriate shocks occurred in European Society of Cardiology low- to moderate-risk patients. Three shocks occurred in moderate-risk patients and four in American Heart Association high-risk patients. Overall recommendations agreement was 64% with a kappa of 0.270 (p=0.007). C-statistic showed no differences regarding the incidence of appropriate shock (p=0.644). CONCLUSION: sudden cardiac death risk stratification algorithms present discrepancies in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication, both with low accuracy.Associação Médica Brasileira2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022000801059Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.68 n.8 2022reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.20220199info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos-Veloso,Marcelo Antônio OliveiraChaves,Ândrea Virgínia FerreiraCalado,Eveline BarrosMarkman,ManuelBezerra,Lucas SoaresLima,Sandro Gonçalves deMarkman Filho,BrivaldoOliveira,Dinaldo Cavalcanti deeng2022-10-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302022000801059Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2022-10-18T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use? |
| title |
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use? |
| spellingShingle |
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use? Santos-Veloso,Marcelo Antônio Oliveira Sudden cardiac death Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Cardiac arrhythmia |
| title_short |
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use? |
| title_full |
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use? |
| title_fullStr |
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use? |
| title_sort |
ICD indication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: which algorithm to use? |
| author |
Santos-Veloso,Marcelo Antônio Oliveira |
| author_facet |
Santos-Veloso,Marcelo Antônio Oliveira Chaves,Ândrea Virgínia Ferreira Calado,Eveline Barros Markman,Manuel Bezerra,Lucas Soares Lima,Sandro Gonçalves de Markman Filho,Brivaldo Oliveira,Dinaldo Cavalcanti de |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Chaves,Ândrea Virgínia Ferreira Calado,Eveline Barros Markman,Manuel Bezerra,Lucas Soares Lima,Sandro Gonçalves de Markman Filho,Brivaldo Oliveira,Dinaldo Cavalcanti de |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos-Veloso,Marcelo Antônio Oliveira Chaves,Ândrea Virgínia Ferreira Calado,Eveline Barros Markman,Manuel Bezerra,Lucas Soares Lima,Sandro Gonçalves de Markman Filho,Brivaldo Oliveira,Dinaldo Cavalcanti de |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sudden cardiac death Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Cardiac arrhythmia |
| topic |
Sudden cardiac death Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Cardiac arrhythmia |
| description |
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the agreement in the indication of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, as per the 2014 European Society of Cardiology and 2020 American Heart Association recommendations, and evaluate fragmented QRS as a predictor of cardiovascular outcome. METHODS: Retrospective cohort with 81 patients was evaluated between 2019 and 2021. Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ≥16 years old were included. Exclusion criteria include secondary myocardiopathy and follow-up <1 year. Kappa coefficient was used to determine the agreement. Survival and incidence curves were determined by Kaplan-Meier method. A p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The fragmented QRS was identified in 44.4% of patients. There were no differences between patients with and without fragmented QRS regarding clinical parameters, echocardiography, fibrosis, and sudden cardiac death risk. During follow-up of 4.8±3.4 years, there was no sudden cardiac death, but 20.6% patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator had at least one appropriate shock. Three of the seven appropriate shocks occurred in European Society of Cardiology low- to moderate-risk patients. Three shocks occurred in moderate-risk patients and four in American Heart Association high-risk patients. Overall recommendations agreement was 64% with a kappa of 0.270 (p=0.007). C-statistic showed no differences regarding the incidence of appropriate shock (p=0.644). CONCLUSION: sudden cardiac death risk stratification algorithms present discrepancies in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication, both with low accuracy. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-01 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022000801059 |
| url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022000801059 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9282.20220199 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.68 n.8 2022 reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) instacron:AMB |
| instname_str |
Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
| instacron_str |
AMB |
| institution |
AMB |
| reponame_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
| collection |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ramb@amb.org.br |
| _version_ |
1754212837819940864 |